Consideration for the betrayed wife

Hahahahahahahahahaha Originally Posted by Wakeup

Precisely why my post was directed towards EA, not you. I do not expect you to change your view (nor am I trying to), and I do expect you to be crass. You didn't disappoint on either.

the person who started this thread isn't even here. as far as I'm concerned, screw her, and her betrayed friend.

Precisely why my post was directed towards EA, not you. Originally Posted by Old-T

I have no doubt...I just thought it was funny that you called that scenario "morally correct"...

the person who started this thread isn't even here. as far as I'm concerned, screw her, and her betrayed friend. Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

Her betrayed friend aka herself.
I think it's more obnoxious that she came here trying to pull a fast one. If she would have just admitted that it was her maybe more would have had some compassion.

I have no doubt...I just thought it was funny that you called that scenario "morally correct"... Originally Posted by Wakeup

Glad I could provide some humor in your day.

I actually find darkly humorous, especially since at least one new member (HH) is accusing me of being dogmatically rigid when in fact my whole point is that everyone's moccasins are different and broad blanket condemnation-or approval-rarely is justified. Originally Posted by Old-T

in your other post a big part of your whole point was that only married fellas could offer valid criticism or married fellas. that's not dogmatically rigid?

how is my status as new member relevant to my position? then why did you bring it up? be honest now. or is this one of those spots where lying is morally correct?

I never said that. You misread what I was saying. Apparently I could have been clearer, so when EA asked I clarified. Is there a part of the clarification you do not understand?

As to the "new guy" reference, it was mostly descriptive. I could have said "the guy with the ugly green troll avatar" but i thought "new guy" was more polite. Was i wrong? Did I say that BECAUSE you are a new poster your opinion doesn't matter? No, I said no such thing. I criticized your OPINION, just as I criticized Wakeup's, and he is far from new.

My other point--maybe too subtle for you to catch--was the implication that you might want to look at a poster's history before castigating them in broad, sweeping strokes. Take exception to what I say in a single post--but read a broader body of my work before you think you know me.

Tell me, what lie are you accusing me of? Be specific. You may (and obviously do) disagree with me. But to call me a liar is unsupported.

Just wondered if any providers considered NOT having sex with married gentlemen? My best friend found out her hubby cheated with an escort, and it totally ruined her life. She is a beautiful, loving woman whose husband got addicted to porn and took it to the next level, and she doesn't deserve the pain and devastation this has brought on her and her children. It was totally wrong for said hubby to betray her this way, but I wondered if providers ever think about the damage they do to others with their sexual dalliances with married men. It is really sad that women care so little about the hearts of others as to help break them. Originally Posted by Loonygirl

It's not my job to tell married men they should only sleep with their wives. It's my job to provide a service and companionship for those in need of such. If a married man came to me with money in his pocket asking for a date then so be it. If I started refusing service to married men I'd lose 80% at the least of my weekly business.

You only know 1 side of your friend's story. You have no idea what drove her husband to be addicted to other women in the first place.

Either way, I couldn't give a fuck less what hearts are broken. I didn't break them, the guy giving me money broke it. I am not his keeper.

@old t - now answer the 2nd question please like a good sport.

Amazing how so many of the “not married” guys have a deep, insightful understanding about something they have either never tried, or have failed at miserably.

Not exactly the crowd I would look to for insight on what does or does not work well. Well maybe some examples of what does not work. Originally Posted by Old-T

this isn't narrow minded or dogmatic?

I never said that. You misread what I was saying. Apparently I could have been clearer, so when EA asked I clarified. Is there a part of the clarification you do not understand?

As to the "new guy" reference, it was mostly descriptive. I could have said "the guy with the ugly green troll avatar" but i thought "new guy" was more polite. Was i wrong? Did I say that BECAUSE you are a new poster your opinion doesn't matter? No, I said no such thing. I criticized your OPINION, just as I criticized Wakeup's, and he is far from new.

My other point--maybe too subtle for you to catch--was the implication that you might want to look at a poster's history before castigating them in broad, sweeping strokes. Take exception to what I say in a single post--but read a broader body of my work before you think you know me.

Tell me, what lie are you accusing me of? Be specific. You may (and obviously do) disagree with me. But to call me a liar is unsupported. Originally Posted by Old-T

i can handle subtle writing i promise you. don't you know, i spend most of every day reading in my hammock. and do forgive but much better writers than you.

but I'm glad you made the "subtle" comment because i think you intend it to serve the same purpose as the new guy comment. which unfortunately you wouldn't own to. or maybe you really are unaware of what forces drive you. either way, sad.

seems to me the intent was to diminish me as a poster. surely you know the latin for that. it was unnecessary for any other reason. hh was adequate id. new poster was to put me in place.

guess what old t? ideas and arguments have their own status. yours are lacking on this topic.

and now some of your person has been exposed too. for what? this lie to the wife topic must really be important to you. so you're a liar to the old lady? i'm not judging you. yeah that other cat is but fuck him he probably judges everybody about everything.

--but read a broader body of my work before you think you know me. Originally Posted by Old-T

yeah another mistake on your part. i never suggested that i presumed to know you. who the fuck does that on a message board? you i guess. i see you edited and now i'm a troll? because i disagree? i must be a troll? because my argument is better than yours?

liars and cheats suck, yo. own it.

@old t - now answer the 2nd question please like a good sport. Originally Posted by HammockedHank

I did. Suggest you read, this time for comprehension and tell me what part of my post you don't understand.

this isn't narrow minded or dogmatic? Originally Posted by HammockedHank

No, it is not. Again, if you ask a question please have the courtesy to read the reply--replies, plural, in this case.

I answered EA's version of the question and when you had trouble with that i answered yours directly. Just because you don't like the answer is not reason enough to be a broken record.

Again, if you ask a question please have the courtesy to read the reply--replies, plural, in this case.
. Originally Posted by Old-T

sure. how long should i wait for you to do your edits to the answers before responding? you added like 3 paragraphs to that one post.

yeah another mistake on your part. i never suggested that i presumed to know you. who the fuck does that on a message board? you i guess. i see you edited and now i'm a troll? because i disagree? i must be a troll? because my argument is better than yours?

liars and cheats suck, yo. own it. Originally Posted by HammockedHank

You are quickly becoming a buffoon. Where, pray tell, did I call you a troll? I called your avatars a troll for it sure looks like one. Can you not distinguish between your avatar and yourself? That is not a good mental state for you to be in.

Your argument is better than mine? I can't even find your argument--only a statement. WU put forth an argument--though I disagree with it. At least it WAS an argument. You did not.