Traveling Gentleman is............

She's really not that smart. She doesn't even know what a stalker is. Do I call her and hang up? Do I follow her around when she's supposed to have a 1pm appointment then fucks the guy over with some lame excuse for not meeting a client such as no location no appointment? Do I know or even care where this whore lives? Do I want a session with her? The answer to all of these is NO!

However, because I think she's a very poor example of what a quality provider is and I'm not afraid to point it out, because she talks all sorts of shit and I'm not afraid to point it out, because thinks she's some sort of HDH and I mention that only some SW would give 80 blow jobs in the car instead of some sort of HDH that she thinks she is, and I'm not afraid to point it out, then I would qualify as a cyber bully at worst. Then again there's a lot of cyber bullies on this site, and except for dm and her boy, I get lost in the shuffle.

She only uses the term stalker because of the deeper implications of the term and it's meaning. They don't realize that a lot of people can read through their bullshit.

Cyber bully, yes
Asshole, yes
Stalker, no

All of this aside, I do like her ideas of fishing and sessions (no jokes about her fishing and not having to clean up) and her idea of casino trips, and horseback trips. Originally Posted by NOBODY60

Well said, unfortunately as someone once said "if you best a fool you prove nothing". There is a sign post up ahead and you have just entered the DM Zone.
A place where logic and reason are suspended and only batshit crazy
Hooktard and troll logic exist. Serling caught a glimpse of this place and
Went for something a bit more believable.
There are a amazing amount of wonderful women who are not big
Posters, it just takes a bit more effort to find the good ones.

She's really not that smart. She doesn't even know what a stalker is. Do I call her and hang up? Do I follow her around when she's supposed to have a 1pm appointment then fucks the guy over with some lame excuse for not meeting a client such as no location no appointment? Do I know or even care where this whore lives? Do I want a session with her? The answer to all of these is NO!

However, because I think she's a very poor example of what a quality provider is and I'm not afraid to point it out, because she talks all sorts of shit and I'm not afraid to point it out, because thinks she's some sort of HDH and I mention that only some SW would give 80 blow jobs in the car instead of some sort of HDH that she thinks she is, and I'm not afraid to point it out, then I would qualify as a cyber bully at worst. Then again there's a lot of cyber bullies on this site, and except for dm and her boy, I get lost in the shuffle.

She only uses the term stalker because of the deeper implications of the term and it's meaning. They don't realize that a lot of people can read through their bullshit.

Cyber bully, yes
Asshole, yes
Stalker, no

All of this aside, I do like her ideas of fishing and sessions (no jokes about her fishing and not having to clean up) and her idea of casino trips, and horseback trips. Originally Posted by NOBODY60

#17 - "Cyber Stalking" is a term that refers to the act of following another member around online. This may include persistent PMing of the other party, repeated ISOs about the other party, or excessive bumping of reviews or posting in threads about the other individual, whether it be positive or negative information posted. In any of these cases, whether staff deems that the behavior has crossed the line into cyber-stalking, or the "stalked" party complains to staff about the alleged behavior, staff will take the necessary steps to make it stop. Please avoid becoming involved in this type of conduct

Well at least you have the balls to admit to rule violations.

#17 - "Cyber Stalking" is a term that refers to the act of following another member around online. This may include persistent PMing I doubt he did this,,,DM would have told us of the other party, repeated ISOsHaven't seen this,,,. about the other party, or excessive bumping of reviews Haven't seen this either,,,"] or posting in threads about the other individual, whether it be positive or negative information posted. In any of these cases, whether staff deems that the behavior has crossed the line into cyber-stalking, or the "stalked" party complains to staff about the alleged behavior, staff will take the necessary steps to make it stop. Please avoid becoming involved in this type of conduct

Well at least you have the balls to admit to rule violations. Originally Posted by oilfieldscum

We have strong opinions especially on business matters,,,
Many people respond because she is a avid and frequent poster,,,

the wording in the some of the guidelines is hanky big time. maybe that's on purpose so it can be read multiple ways? in any case I read the key wording to be the last part. it's not a violation UNTIL the staff deems it so or DM complains about it to the staff. regardless staff suggests avoidance into this fringe.

of course seems there is no argument to be made now if the staff deems it so.

hmm.. only u and DM know if u are an angry 1 pm appt. Originally Posted by SweetDulce

Just so you know, I don't have anything against you. In the future, if you quote me, at least quote the context of what I'm saying, and don't make it look like it's something else completely and totally out of context. Thanks.

#17 - "Cyber Stalking" is a term that refers to the act of following another member around online. This may include persistent PMing of the other party, repeated ISOs about the other party, or excessive bumping of reviews or posting in threads about the other individual, whether it be positive or negative information posted. In any of these cases, whether staff deems that the behavior has crossed the line into cyber-stalking, or the "stalked" party complains to staff about the alleged behavior, staff will take the necessary steps to make it stop. Please avoid becoming involved in this type of conduct

Well at least you have the balls to admit to rule violations. Originally Posted by oilfieldscum

Of course she'll bitch about it, do the RTM and everything else. However when she does this, I will RTM every post she's made where she flames somebody. I guarantee you that she's flamed the hell out of other members here in many different threads. We can play this game all night.

Actually the only thing I posted until her and her buddy tg posted, is that I stated the tg is her white knight.

I would consider tony gambino to be your white knight, and in many threads. Originally Posted by NOBODY60

Just so you know, I don't have anything against you but its damn scary how you're able to see what I'm thinking yes I'm a stalker and an angry 1 pm appointment....your ability to see through my bullshit is astounding ......I think I need to take a drive in my creeper van Originally Posted by NOBODY60

FIFY.....

Actually the only thing I posted until her and her buddy tg posted, is that I stated the tg is her white knight. Originally Posted by NOBODY60

I was almost REALLY offended. Then I realized who you meant by tg. Apparently tg = tony gambino and TG = TravelingGentleman.

As you were.

Hilarious tangent in the thread. No offense taken. I have learned the definition of "threAD."

TG u are honestly too smart to use the term threAD.. of course all of our posts are,,, us who post alot are our own CEO, CFO president, marketing team, tech support, hr, etc. wouldn't u if u got free advrtising???

TG u are honestly too smart to use the term threAD.. of course all of our posts are,,, us who post alot are our own CEO, CFO president, marketing team, tech support, hr, etc. wouldn't u if u got free advrtising??? Originally Posted by SweetDulce

I'm unsure what you mean by "too smart to use the term threAD." My point was that I learned what the term "threAD" means...providers who don't allow or want reviews aren't allowed to advertise, and so create threads or threADs to generate attention in the place of advertisements.

IE, legal advertisement within the boundaries of the ECCIE forums.

She's really not that smart. She doesn't even know what a stalker is. Do I call her and hang up? Do I follow her around when she's supposed to have a 1pm appointment then fucks the guy over with some lame excuse for not meeting a client such as no location no appointment?
you do realize there is a difference between cyber stalking and RW stalking.
What you describe is RW stalking it is a legal matter, and up to the proper authorities to handle. LE
Cyberstalking is a guideline violation, and up to the mods to determine when the line is crossed and action is to be taken.
...instead of some sort of HDH that she thinks she is, and I'm not afraid to point it out, then I would qualify as a cyber bully at worst. Then again there's a lot of cyber bullies on this site, and except for dm and her boy, I get lost in the shuffle.

She only uses the term stalker because of the deeper implications of the term and it's meaning. They don't realize that a lot of people can read through their bullshit.
I think she uses the term stalker because you're following her around the board rudely commenting on her posts.
Cyber bully, yes
Asshole, yes
Stalker, no
Cyber Stalker, the jury is still out on that one

All of this aside, I do like her ideas of fishing and sessions (no jokes about her fishing and not having to clean up) and her idea of casino trips, and horseback trips. Originally Posted by NOBODY60

you obviously don't know DM that well if you think she considers herself a HDH. I've never got that vibe from her. And no I'm not a WK, Dorthy can take care of herself, and I might catch a wild throat punch trying to fight her fight.

I was just pointing out how readily you admit to bring a bully, and an ass, but claim not having violated the guidelines. The error was in your definition of the violation.

Actually the only thing I posted until her and her buddy tg posted, is that I stated the tg is her white knight. Originally Posted by NOBODY60

You might identify a double standard occasionally among posters ... Some can say whatever they want, to whomever they want, and when they want to do so.

After you post ..... they are not "stalking" ... just ask them.

But if you respond to what they have to say about you? All Hell breaks loose.

And the "stalking" allegations emerge, among others, in an effort to quiet you.

I'm unsure what you mean by "too smart to use the term threAD." ms. Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

Because none of the guys that use the term use it correctly.
I'm starting to think ur not too intelligent. Just educated.

Attention Whores are constantly creating threADS,,,

One has to insult --possible--
future client's ,,,
intelligent called the kettle black.
Color blind irony,,,

... My point was that I learned what the term "threAD" means...providers who don't allow or want reviews aren't allowed to advertise, and so create threads or threADs to generate attention in the place of advertisements.

IE, legal advertisement within the boundaries of the ECCIE forums. Originally Posted by TravelingGentleman

Not exactly, darlin'. Any Verified Provider can place an ad on ECCIE. Doesn't matter if she doesn't allow or want reviews.

About that; yes, gentlemen should respect a provider's "No Review" policy, but it's the fellow's choice about whether or not he wants to brag, complain, or just share his experience. Not like a provider can effectively block him. I do not believe ECCIE would (or should) take the responsibility of enforcing an individual provider's "no review" policy and remove one at the lady's request, but a mod would have to step in and clarify that. Mods will delete non-publicized information in a review, like a phone number or email that a provider doesn't advertise. Reviews, while entertaining, are written for informational purposes. They are the "Consumer Reports" of our industry. Not like Honda can stop a review of their latest Accord.

I digress. Providers post "threADs," that mutation of comment and advertisement, yes, to generate attention, but it's in addition to their regular ads. Just more promotional exposure. If it is TOO blatant, however, it can be removed. Let's say I started a thread about shoes, expressed my interest in buying more, then included a special with actual rates stated to help me get to the store. RTM...DELETE...DELETE...DELETE .

Really, ANY comment a lady makes on here is an advertisement, representing her personality and attitude. Positive pubic, er, public relations is a 24/7 job.

Not exactly, darlin'. Any Verified Provider can place an ad on ECCIE. Doesn't matter if she doesn't allow or want reviews.
Not like a provider can effectively stop him. I do not believe ECCIE would (or should) take the responsibility of enforcing an individual provider's "no review" policy and remove one, but a mod would have to step in and clarify that.


Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

Sorry Fancy, ya got it wrong. If a provider puts a no review policy in force with us, then they are not allowed to advertise on here. We would pull any ads.

Also, any reviews of her would be removed.

Something else I am forgetting, but I am sure Spice will be along shortly.