I was referring to your AIDS being fact, or can't you read?You'd be the demented, supercilious Yankee jackass trying to escape and forget your past as you stupidly "out yourself" by returning to have your ass mauled again, mope.
I have no idea what the rest of your drivel means. Your dementia is getting out of hand. Originally Posted by Revenant
I was referring to your AIDS being fact, or can't you read?Le0venant did that bear give it to you good? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHBKRFmNwXo
I have no idea what the rest of your drivel means. Your dementia is getting out of hand. Originally Posted by Revenant
You'd be the demented, supercilious Yankee jackass trying to escape and forget your past as you stupidly "out yourself" by returning to have your ass mauled again, mope.There it is again - "ass mauling". You seem to like that phrase a lot. You seem to be obsessed with it.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Le0venant did that bear give it to you good? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHBKRFmNwXoHillbilly! How's it going? Is the family tree still a straight line?
you ought to be good and stretched out for a TRUMP! Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
There it is again - "ass mauling". You seem to like that phrase a lot. You seem to be obsessed with it.Perhaps people in here – and possibly in Dallas -- would be much more interested in learning more about who this “revenant” character is, this character who is possibly/formerly of New York and who possibly now resides in Dallas who by his new handle more than suggests that he has “returned” from oblivion … this character who is possibly/formerly of New York and who possibly now resides in Dallas who claims to have sole proprietary rights to certain idioms like “mope” and “tranny fuckee”?
Is that what you pay the trannies in New Orleans to do to you, Mr. Mauled Ass? Originally Posted by Revenant
Maybe someone in here, or possibly in Dallas, might be tempted to use those idioms as “search terms” and possibly link those idiomatic terms to a “guested” account here in the Political Forum and then, just possibly, connect that “guested” account to a former handle, mope.tranny fuckee Originally Posted by Revenant
mope Originally Posted by I B HankeringYou can't even think of an insult of your own, mope? You have to copy mine?
In addition to lacking originality, isn't "mope" kind of short for you, mope?
tranny fuckee Originally Posted by Revenant
Bye, you mopes. Originally Posted by RevenantWelcome back, ExNYer.
Maybe someone in here, or possibly in Dallas, might be tempted to use those idioms as “search terms” and possibly link those idiomatic terms to a “guested” account here in the Political Forum and then, just possibly, connect that “guested” account to a former handle, mope. Originally Posted by I B HankeringWell, at least he isn't denying it like that undercunt/wombhater asshole.
Hillbilly! How's it going? Is the family tree still a straight line?
So, what are you saying about Trump? He is a homo? I thought you were against that sort of stuff. Or are you now part of the secret gay agenda? Originally Posted by Revenant
Without Senator Ted Cruz there wouldn’t be TPA.
We’ve previously outlined the issue HERE. Senator Cruz supported the legislative trade-passage vehicle of TPA (Trade Promotion Authority) because ultimately the trade bill itself (TPP) benefits Wall Street’s interests.
However, the best way to understand the issue of his support is to actually listen to Ted Cruz explain in 2015 why he supported, then stopped supporting TPA:
You can clearly see, in his own words, Senator Cruz stating he stopped supporting TPA because Senator Mitch McConnell lied to him about buying votes for a later re-authorization of the Import-Export bank, which Ted Cruz does not support.
An intellectually honest person would admit, given the reasoning Cruz eloquently delivered, that absent of the Import/Export bank issue the Senator supported the legislative vehicle TPA and the final product TPP.
Ultimately, the simple question: “why would a Senator support the vehicle for trade approval (TPA) if the Senator had doubts about the actual trade deal itself (TPP)” ?
Secondly: “why would a Senator support Fast-Track TPA, the change for 60 vote legislative support for approval to a 61 vote threshold of disapproval, if the senator did not want to grant easier authorization for the president” ?
The bottom line is Senator Cruz supported TPA. Senator Cruz admits he supported TPA in the video above. Remember also, this was HIS BILL along with Paul Ryan.
cruz McConnell
TPA is HR2146 (TPA “Trade Promotion Authority” containing “Fast Track”): This House Bill #2146 originating April 30th ’15, became the vehicle for passage of Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal.
HR2146 was originally introduced in the House of Representatives as a bill to address issues with retirement funds of federal law enforcement officers and firefighters.
In the beginning of the congressional session, with Republicans now in control of both the House and Senate, in Feb-March-April of 2015, Senator Ted Cruz and House Ways and Means Chairman, Representative Paul Ryan, supported Trade Promotion Authority being added to HR2146.
Their support was most notable when they posted the following Op-Ed which appeared in the Wall Street Journal on April 22nd:
http://paulryan.house.gov/news/docum...umentID=398270
ted cruz 1paul ryan 1
On May 12th, 2015, HR2146 passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended. Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 407 – 5 (Roll no. 220). (text: CR H2848)
The bill passed the house 407-5 because it was not controversial. It was simply a bill for benefits toward LEO and Firefighters retirement funds.
However, as planned, on June 4th 2015, the senate passed the house bill “with changes”. The Trade-Deal was added and notably included an amendment “adding TPA” (thanks to Ted Cruz) and TAA (needed for Elizabeth Warren coalition). TAA was an amendment by the Elizabeth Warren coalition to add union retraining funds in the event the trade bill resulted in job lay-offs.
TPA with TAA passed by unanimous consent thereby avoiding a roll vote on record.
https://www.congress.gov/congression...age/H4507-4518
On June 18, 2015 the House accepted the TPA change (Paul Ryan spearhead). The change was the addition of TPA and TAA to the original fire fighters retirement bill.
However, Ryan removed TAA (the financial assistance package for training of union workers – this angered the base of the progressive caucus, Pelosi, Warren, etc). The Senate Democrats, who generally oppose TPP were hoodwinked – TAA was never originally going to be allowed – Senator Elizabeth Warren was furious.
The Democrats in the Senate were furious. They turned to Nancy Pelosi for help in getting the entire fiasco eliminated. However, the White House (President Obama) supported the entire construct of the TPP. Minority leader Nancy Pelosi had to be arm twisted by the White House to go along with HR2146 with TAA spending removed – she acquiesced to President Obama.
Without the training amendment (TAA), HR2146 passed again in the House – only this time with a much closer vote of 218-208, and went back to the Senate to resolve differences. (Remember because of the way it was constructed, the only difference now was the removal of TAA – the training spending)
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-...ouse-bill/2146
On June 24th HR2146 (TPA without TAA) Then passed the Senate (Ted Cruz did not attempt to block or filibuster because this was the original plan all along). The bill passed in the Senate 60-38 (3/5ths passage rule).
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...n=1&vote=00219
President Obama now had “fast track trade authorization” to complete the Trans-Pacific Trade Deal; and thanks to Senator Ted Cruz President Obama only needed 51 votes to pass it.
On June 29th 2015 Obama signed Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and HR2146 became law. President Obama now has the legislative vehicle (TPA) he needs to see TPP (the actual deal itself) get through the Senate.
It would now take more votes to block the Trans-Pacific Trade Deal than to approve it. Thanks to Senator Ted Cruz and Speaker Paul Ryan the threshold for legislative approval was lowered.
TPP trade 2
Senator Ted Cruz voted for Cloture on TPA Fast track trade authority removing the hurdle and concern of further amendments and clearing the way for passage.
Again, just like “unanimous consent” cloture votes are not recorded roll call votes. Thereby Ted Cruz could obfuscate his support. He figured to hide, see how that works?
However, Cruz advocacy could not be hidden entirely. On another bill HR 1314 Cruz voted against an amendment to the Trade Deal that would require congress to be consulted if China (or other nations) were to join after the fact:
Senate Amendment 1251 “To require the approval of Congress before additional countries may join the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement”…
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...n=1&vote=00189
Cruz voted NAY. Directly saying he did not want congress to be consulted before other countries, namely CHINA, could join TPP.
♦ The China Back Door – Remember during November 2015’s GOP debate, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz were saying China is not part of TPP; contrast their voices against Donald Trump who was honestly saying TPP carries a backdoor for China (and Russia) to join.
NOVEMBER 4th – In an interview with Russian interstate channel Mir TV, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry invited China and Russia to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
“We invite people to come join other initiatives, like the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the TPP. We welcome China, we welcome Russia, we welcome other countries who would like to join, as long as they want to raise the standards and live up to the highest standards of protecting people and doing business openly and transparently and accountably,” said Secretary Kerry. (read more) State Dept Link HERE
Donald Trump was entirely correct. Senator Rand Paul, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz were factually incorrect. Everyone knows China will ultimately join TPP, it’s not a big secret.
Perhaps people in here – and possibly in Dallas -- would be much more interested in learning more about who this “revenant” character is, this character who is possibly/formerly of New York and who possibly now resides in Dallas who by his new handle more than suggests that he has “returned” from oblivion … this character who is possibly/formerly of New York and who possibly now resides in Dallas who claims to have sole proprietary rights to certain idioms like “mope” and “tranny fuckee”? Originally Posted by I B HankeringNo one could ever own "tranny fuckee", but you. That is all yours.
Welcome back, ExNYer.I can neither confirm nor deny any connection to any other members of this board.
So revenant, what happened? Did you get fed up and leave, then realize how much you missed us?
Or did you quit to marry a former Playboy Playmate, only to have it end up in a quickie divorce? Originally Posted by lustylad
No one could ever own "tranny fuckee", but you. That is all yours.
But this "Ex" fellow must have really burned you a bunch of times. It appears that your feelings of inadequacy with respect to him have made you into an obsessive stalker. I pity you. Originally Posted by Revenant
