Senator Feinstein......."we either fight ISIS now, or fight them later"

A butt you are for sure, but not every post is about you or your butt. Originally Posted by LexusLover

You are always talking abut someones butt lexie.

You are always talking abut someones butt lexie. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

You craving some moslem cock again... eehhbuhhhrrrrr?

The 0zombie King hooked you up... eehhbuhrrrrrrr!

I am craving some moslem cock again... eehhbuhhhrrrrr?

The 0zombie King hooked Me up... eehhbuhrrrrrrr!] Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

FIFY whiffy Want me to call gay rey for you?

FIFY whiffy Want me to call gay rey for you? Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Naw, just get your lube and copy of MonkeyButtMan and go to town ... eehhbuhhhrrrrr

Naw, just get your lube and copy of MonkeyButtMan and go to town ... eehhbuhhhrrrrr


Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

What the FUCK are you talking about again?

Is that a magazine? Or are you advocating (forbidden topic)?

No telling when it comes to you, SLOBBRIN.

"Keeping Americans safe" is not necessarily mutually exclusive of "freedom."

It sounds to me like there are parts of Chicago in which the citizens are not FREE to go about their personal lives without FEAR of being killed. It seems IT SHOULD BE A PRIORITY FOR GOVERNMENT TO ASSURE THEY CAN BE FREE TO GO ABOUT THEIR PERSONAL LIVES.

Apparently doing that job of keeping them "FREE" requires more "GOVERNMENT"! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Do you try to misread my posts? Of course government should protect people. Where did I say it should not? But the primary purpose is to keep the country free. It's a matter of perspective. The government does not "give" freedom. Freedom is the natural state of humanity. There are people in Chicago, and all over, who are trying to deny others their natural right to not be denied their life, liberty or property by force (or fraud). That's where government steps in. I've maintained that since I started posting here. Pay attention.


You can take away guns in the name of safety, but not freedom.
You can prohibit speech in the name of creating a "safe space", but not freedom.
You can register members of a certain religion in the name of safety, but not freedom.


There are lots of actions that government can take in the name of safety, but are anti-freedom. If we make our primary focus safety, we lose freedom. If our primary focus is freedom, then safety measures are less likely to resemble tyranny.

You are always talking abut someones butt lexie. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

And YOU are always dreaming about getting TO someone's butt for the dingleberries, EKIM !

Do you try to misread my posts?

If we make our primary focus safety, we lose freedom. If our primary focus is freedom, then safety measures are less likely to resemble tyranny. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

No I don't misread your posts. If you want less government then ask less of it.

The way to reduce cops working traffic control (less government) on the freeway is for drivers to VOLUNTARILY comply with the posted speed signs and other traffic laws that were put in place to ASSURE EVERYONE'S SAFETY.

And if everyone obeyed the traffic laws they were supposed to learn to get their PRIVILEGE to drive a motor vehicle then WE would have LESS GOVERNMENT by eliminating the NEED FOR TRAFFIC COURTS and SUPPORT STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE TO HOUSE THE STAFF AND THE COURTS along with the associated paper work and processing that goes along with it.

From the bottom up the list is endless that CITIZENS can VOLUNTARILY DO to reduce the UNNECESSARY size of GOVERNMENT to PROTECT OTHERS FROM THOSE WHO DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT ANYONE BUT THEMSELVES.

Is the 65 mph speed sign your idea of TYRANNY? Does it impede your freedom to do 90 mph?

Naw, just get your lube and copy of MonkeyButtMan and go to town ... eehhbuhhhrrrrr


Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

You aren't my type whiffy, but thanks for asking.

And YOU are always dreaming about getting TO someone's butt for the dingleberries, EKIM ! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

Gay rey DAOYT 2016, fag of the year 2015 ,congratulate him.

No I don't misread your posts. If you want less government then ask less of it.

The way to reduce cops working traffic control (less government) on the freeway is for drivers to VOLUNTARILY comply with the posted speed signs and other traffic laws that were put in place to ASSURE EVERYONE'S SAFETY.

And if everyone obeyed the traffic laws they were supposed to learn to get their PRIVILEGE to drive a motor vehicle then WE would have LESS GOVERNMENT by eliminating the NEED FOR TRAFFIC COURTS and SUPPORT STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE TO HOUSE THE STAFF AND THE COURTS along with the associated paper work and processing that goes along with it.

From the bottom up the list is endless that CITIZENS can VOLUNTARILY DO to reduce the UNNECESSARY size of GOVERNMENT to PROTECT OTHERS FROM THOSE WHO DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT ANYONE BUT THEMSELVES.

Is the 65 mph speed sign your idea of TYRANNY? Does it impede your freedom to do 90 mph? Originally Posted by LexusLover

You are intentionally stupid. But keep making stuff up. Apparently it entertains you.

Gay rey DAOYT 2016, fag of the year 2015 ,congratulate him. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

EKIM THE INBRED CHIMP, woomby's WK extrodinaire, JUNIOR World Champion Dingleberry picker and preparation H lip balm field tester !

Gay rey the faggot woomby's WK extrodinaire, JUNIOR World Champion Dingleberry picker and preparation H lip balm field tester ! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

FIFY

FIFY Originally Posted by i'va biggen

We ALL know that ot's YOU who WK's for woomby and loves dingleberry picking with YOUR one tooth Ekim. But nice try at deflection and transference !

We ALL know that ot's YOU who WK's for woomby and loves dingleberry picking with YOUR one tooth Ekim. But nice try at deflection and transference ! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

ATTN : gay rey needs a dick to suck, PM him or got to his web site ILLSUkUDRY.com