DEMOCRAT MENENDEZ, SEXUAL PREDATOR OF UNDERAGE TEENS...

WPF was losing the argument, as usual, and tried to deflect, again, unsuccessfully.

WPF was losing the argument, as usual, and tried to deflect, again, unsuccessfully. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

These are just opinions...one does not lose or win opinions. You have yours, I have mine. Period.

all things considered, Whirlyturd writes like a third grader.

No wonder he was truly elected

Unaliar of the Year!

Smily face. Smily face. Smily face.

I have mine. Period. Originally Posted by WTF

Then why were deflecting, and not addressing the issue?

Oh, and I'm sorry you're on your period. If you want to wait a couple days before answering, it's OK.

WTF (am I doing), I take that you support Menedez in ALL of his endeavors?

OH IT WAS ME AND ONLY ME POSTING IN THAT THREAD...lol tff. I took up for Paterno, he did not fuc anybody and he was 85 years old and I advocated letting the legal system play out. I dont give a shit if you want to let folks talk about this shit. he ain't my senator! Originally Posted by WTF

No, you and your GF were having one of your usual spats there. But you are the one quoting the rules in this thread. I'm merely explaining the history.

CC, back already? Welcome home!

Then why were deflecting, and not addressing the issue?

Oh, and I'm sorry you're on your period. If you want to wait a couple days before answering, it's OK.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Don't you have some Chem stream to rail about?

WTF (am I doing), I take that you support Menedez in ALL of his endeavors? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I mainly support him (Menedez) fucking you in the ass and letting COG lick your shit off his dick.

No, you and your GF were having one of your usual spats there. But you are the one quoting the rules in this thread. I'm merely explaining the history. Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

Then why not take the rule about not talking about children out. It does not sound like it applies anymore in here?

If I remember correctly, I tried at some point early on to point that rule out in that thread too. God knows I regret ever getting into any discussion with you know who.

Now that we understand some of WTF's proclivities we can get back to politics. Has anyone else seen the first episode of Amerikans or do they spell it Americans now?

why do you tea nuts think sex is such a bad thing? the problem I have was he did not pay the airfare till it was brought up Originally Posted by WTF

Why is it that anyone who disagrees with your opinion is a "tea nut"?

.. or a "tea puke" ... or .... ____________ (fill in the blank)?

Or .... any kind of a "nut" ... or "puke" if

"These are just opinions...one does not lose or win opinions. You have yours, I have mine. Period."

Name calling is not an argument, IMO,

.... it is often a recognition of an inability to make a relevant, logical response. When people are unable to refute what is spoken they often resort to attacking the speaker...in a personal manner.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=659114

Why is it that anyone who disagrees with your opinion is a "tea nut"?

Or .... any kind of a "nut" ... if Originally Posted by LexusLover

IDK....maybe because most that post that disagree with me are self proclaimed Tea Nuts.

Why is it that who disagree's with me calls me a liberal commie supporter? It is how the game is played in this forum.

It is how the game is played in this forum. Originally Posted by WTF

You are "playing the game" are trying to be a referee?

You are "playing the game" are trying to be a referee? Originally Posted by LexusLover

That is part of the game!

That is part of the game! Originally Posted by WTF

Not "the game" .... YOUR game, perhaps. But one day you'll figure out, may be, that referees playing the game usually make poor players and players trying to referee usually make poor referees.

And you seem to be proving that theory.

Not "the game" .... YOUR game, perhaps. But one day you'll figure out, may be, that referees playing the game usually make poor players and players trying to referee usually make poor referees.

And you seem to be proving that theory. Originally Posted by LexusLover

LL, perhaps you would have more luck directing your observations toward the Mods, as opposed to one side and not the other. It would seem to me that the Mods would have the authority to stop the name calling, not WTF.

Then again, perhaps you are naive enough to believe "they" would stop the name calling if only WTF would make the initial "good faith" leap. Good luck with that!

I suspect the "Trending" lines would be heavily against your one side and not the other approach. But you don't know if you don't try. Right?

Please understand, I am not trying "to rain on your parade." I am just delivering a heavy dose of "Sandbox" reality.

In any event, I truly wish you the best of luck with the effort. Be sure to let me know how it goes!

While on the subject, should your proposed name calling ban also extend to those individuals who regularly refer to the President as "Obamanable"? Or is that not considered name calling?

Is name calling by any other name, still name calling?

Just sayin'