Inquiries and Impeachment of Trump

The Democrats are stupid to know what they just did with this impeachment process. This will happen to another president one day. Gaff clown Biden would be deserving of this, talk about "Malarkey" , lol.

Why won’t the fat lying bastard let John Bolton testify ?

The former national security adviser was, according to several witnesses, the highest-ranking voice of dissent within the administration when it came to the Trump team’s dealings with Ukraine. He compared it to a “drug deal.” He encouraged people to register their dismay with lawyers and memorialize it. And his lawyers have signaled he has a story to tell, sending a letter in early November stating he knows about “many relevant meetings and conversations” — including, conspicuously, events that witnesses at that point hadn’t testified to.

If there were one witness who had both the access to Trump to perhaps know what the president said about Ukraine, and the motivation to tell a story that Trump may not like, it would be Bolton. But Bolton has said he needs a court to tell him he can talk. And if someone like Bolton wants to testify (albeit under the right circumstances), why not give him that chance? Originally Posted by Jaxson66

The POTUS has no control over Bolton. Bolton is holding the party line. Only the SCOTUS can tell him to testify. And, in my opinion, they wouldn't.

The POTUS has no control over Bolton. Bolton is holding the party line. Only the SCOTUS can tell him to testify. And, in my opinion, they wouldn't. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

you realize that when the Supreme Court does so it validates Trump's claim of executive privilege, right?

Bolton can voluntarily testify, but he CANNOT be compelled by subpoena by Congress .. because they have no right to subpoena.


thank you valued poster!

The POTUS has no control over Bolton. Bolton is holding the party line. Only the SCOTUS can tell him to testify. And, in my opinion, they wouldn't. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Damn, you finally get it, good for you. Sometimes the law is a bitch and the bitch won't cooperate when you want her to.

Ok, it’s a good thing a few polls are positive for the fat lying bastard. Maybe it will calm his fat ass down. Screaming and shouting for hours at a rally was bad optics. He best pace himself, because he’s got more heat coming his way.

A Whitewash by the Senate won’t stop anything. The barrels are being loaded for perjury and obstruction of justice, and no one is afraid to pull the triggers. Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Excuse me? No one is afraid to pull the trigger? Did they pull the trigger when they had the chance? They could have pilled on perjury if they had any evidence and we can assume that since no perjury charge was made they didn't have the evidence. You sound like Schiff who said for years he had the evidence that nobody else had and when asked to present it, the little weasel tucked his tail and ran.


Obstruction of Justice? Mueller started with 10 and then it was down to 5 and yet the 5 they said they could prove didn't make into the final articles and they did that for "brevity"? Those accusations are dead and buried. With the Horowitz report now out in the open and everybody can see how Schiff and Pelosi and Comey all lied through their teeth, Americans have to be asking themselves if they can believe anything these clowns have to say and you can make all the snide comments you want about the Durham report like you did about the Horowitz report but you won't be laughing when the indictments come down but I will.

Ok, it’s a good thing a few polls are positive for the fat lying bastard. Maybe it will calm his fat ass down. Screaming and shouting for hours at a rally was bad optics. He best pace himself, because he’s got more heat coming his way.

A Whitewash by the Senate won’t stop anything. The barrels are being loaded for perjury and obstruction of justice, and no one is afraid to pull the triggers. Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Poor Jax, still looking/wishing for that next big gotcha that just never comes that will bring Trump down.

And now he even has to come to grips with the fact that the impeachment ramp up and final vote might actually be swinging the polls in favor of Trump.

j666 will never acknowledge that the impeachment partisan DPST process and the DPST lies might swing voters opinion against them. Not to him/herself - or anyone.

DPST's have no regard for voters - any non-elite DPST's are simply "deplorables" who should exist only to serve the DPST elite, and certainly never have a voice in governance.

Maxine and Rashida Tlaib, with others - today celebrated with "We 'peached the M-F er. "

Repeated often and loudly.

Maxine and Rashida Tlaib, with others - today celebrated with "We 'peached the M-F er. "

Repeated often and loudly. Originally Posted by oeb11

Link? Vudeo? Please.

See DPST debate tonight.

Nuclear expert Eric Swalwell will comment on nuclear weapons for Iran and Hamas .

Bernie on record for pro- nuclear Hamas as "equality" in foreign policy.


Thank you - 9500/

The New York Times is reporting that Durham has asked for ( a polite way of saying subpoenaed since this guy has the power that Horowitz didn't ) Brennan's records to see if his public statements square with what he said in private. I've said from the start that Brennan is the lynch pin to all things Trump, Russia investigation and that Brennan at best did "sloppy" work as Comey puts it and at worst did criminal things all to get even with the man who said he didn't have a lot of faith in the Intelligence agencies, the impetus for Brennan going after Trump.

See DPST debate tonight.

Nuclear expert Eric Swalwell will comment on nuclear weapons for Iran and Hamas .

Thank you - 9500/ Originally Posted by oeb11

I have a pretty short list, all things considered, of people that I will not listen to. For some reason, this guy makes me want to puke. I put him in the same category has Hamas Tlaib and bat shit crazy Maxine Waters. What ever Swallwell has to say will be said by others that I can stomach.

https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct...om-office.html

We believe the impeachment hearings have made it absolutely clear, in a way the Mueller investigation did not, that President Trump has abused his authority for personal gain and betrayed his constitutional oath. The impeachment hearings have illuminated the president’s moral deficiencies for all to see. This damages the institution of the presidency, damages the reputation of our country, and damages both the spirit and the future of our people. None of the president’s positives can balance the moral and political danger we face under a leader of such grossly immoral character.

Mark Galli is editor in chief of Christianity Today.

What ever Swallwell has to say will be said by others that I can stomach. Originally Posted by HedonistForever

I feel the same way about Louie Gohmert. Can you imagine him flying to France for an international political conference? A reporter sees his name tag and adresses him in French. The look on that reporter's face would be priceless right after he opens his mouth.

Damn, you finally get it, good for you. Sometimes the law is a bitch and the bitch won't cooperate when you want her to. Originally Posted by HedonistForever

Are you positive Bolton didn’t sign a non disclosure agreement, if he did so can’t he be sued. The fat lying bastard has a long history of suing people.

My question is, when Bolton publishes his book can that be used as evidence? Bolton stated he would publish before the 2020 election.