Ketanji Brown Jackson

Condi is a true lady!

After 8 years of Obaminable it demonstrates you are wrong.

(Of course he was an affirmative action student at Harvard!)

Over the years of your posting ... "sufficient enough to me" is an extremely low standard. Originally Posted by LexusLover

What does Obama being president for 8 years have to do with Jackson? How do you know that Obama was admitted into Harvard Law School with less than a 3.0 GPA. How do you know that every other applicant to Harvard Law School (White, Black or Brown) had a higher GPA in college than Obama?

If you want to add Affirmation action / qualifications to the conversation then adding Bush to the conversation is fair game. Bush was admitted into Harvard MBA when He WAS NOT qualified.

Bush was president for 8 years just like Obama.

You are a product of that special school system you were posting about two weeks ago.

Condi is a true lady! Originally Posted by winn dixie

She was a good SOS. She is not qualified to be a supreme court justice. She has never been a judge or lawyer. She did not attend any law schools. She just happens to be a republican.

I'll

I need to got to the vet to pick up a prescription. Originally Posted by LexusLover

That's where you Trump lovers get your medication now!

That's where you Trump lovers get your medication now! Originally Posted by WTF

Kiddie Groomers like you have no room to complain.

She was a good SOS. She is not qualified to be a supreme court justice. She has never been a judge or lawyer. She did not attend any law schools. She just happens to be a republican. Originally Posted by adav8s28

The Constitution does not list any requirements to be nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to be a Justice on the Supreme Court.

Have you ever seen the move”First Monday in October”. Walter Mattow plays an Aging Liber Associate Justice who makes it plain that Supreme Court Justices are bound by nothing more than their own feelings in ruling on anything.

The Constitution does not list any requirements to be nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to be a Justice on the Supreme Court.
Originally Posted by Jackie S

That is correct. However, when was the last time the President nominated someone that did not have any experience as a judge or lawyer?

She was a good SOS. She is not qualified to be a supreme court justice. She has never been a judge or lawyer. She did not attend any law schools. She just happens to be a republican. Originally Posted by adav8s28

She's smarter than you, so your opinion of her is worthless.

How many languages can you speak fluently?

That is correct. However, when was the last time the President nominated someone that did not have any experience as a judge or lawyer? Originally Posted by adav8s28

You just recently voted for a demented fool who babbles ...

... for POTUS! And I realize there are no constitutional standards UPON WHICH you vote and for the POTUS.

I personally would prefer Condie Rice to make a decision in a case in which you are a party than the laughable liar being considered, who would probably vote against you if she found out you believe a person with a vagina is a "woman"!

a common sense american of only slightly above average intelligence or more likely would come to better judgments than most any leftist with a law degree

a common sense american of only slightly above average intelligence or more likely would come to better judgments than most any leftist with a law degree Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

They already have an example of Justice by "skin color and gender" who recently lied during the hearing about Covid19 MANDATES with respect to the number of children being "killed" by Covid in this country. The number "she" gave was in 100's of 1,000's ... IN A FUCKING SCOTUS PUBLIC HEARING!

"Sotomayor"

BTW: One doesn't need to have a "law degree" to know what a "woman" is .... just half of a brain ... or much less! Which is consistent with the value of a "law degree" .... If someone graduates from Harvard Law School and doesn't know that is a "woman" then it says volumes about the quality of legal education obtained while attending Harvard ... that's the 2nd example we've had recently ....

Obaminable is the OTHER ONE!

another is the gaggle of senseless magpies harping against free speech recently at yale law school

Next Supreme Court Justice will be Jackson. No matter what you think of her she will be a justice and you’ll still be relegated to giving your opinion on a whore board. Her opinions will be meaningful and yours meaningless.

She definitely made the gop senators look like stupid idiots on crack lol n omg n you go girl!!!

Yes I do say n know so dah. gop supporters love their idiots

blah blah blah

So this chick is qualified ? uh she only answered half the questions. You know the softball ones by her fellow comrade dims! What a disgrace!