Are you equally revolted by murderous acts carried out by Christians in the name of their god? If not, you're as full of shit as you say Obama is. What makes that act morally superior to what the Muslims are doing? Regardless of the consistency of his message, you wouldn't like it and would find something wrong with it. You act like your mind can never change based on new information etc. You want the world to be black and white but it's too grey for a dinosaur like you. If he did the same thing all the time you would accuse him of not adapting.
Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
You see what you did here? You attempted to invalid someones argument by calling them a dinosaur meaning that they (and their argument are old) and the exact same time you are using acts carried out by Christians many hundreds of years ago to justify (am I wrong to use this word?) what Islam is doing today? I think you both shot yourself in the foot and stepped on your dick at the same time.
Then again, I have yet to see protestors justifying the Crusades in the 12th century. I recall too, the Crusader argument was a Muslim argument against George W. Bush in 2003. Are you a radical Muslim because you argue like them.