Who in here would still have invaded Iraq in 2003? We know JD , LL and LustingGayAss would!

Easy guy's lexie lacking is all aflutter over the latest pics of Caitlyn Jenner. Originally Posted by i'va biggen
If LLIdiot was 50 years younger, he would be hitting on Caitlyn Jenner?

Cait's right up his alley!
lustylad's Avatar
Letter to the WSJ:


....The question is, with what you know now would you still have gone to that school, taken that job, rented that apartment or invaded Iraq?

Since the Iraq question has been asked, it brings to mind others that never get asked, let alone answered. Here are a few. Knowing what we know now, would we still have allowed the State Department to reconstruct Iraq? Would we have disbanded the Iraqi army? Would we have given up control of the Iraqi oil industry? Would things be different and better had we kept a Marine regimental combat team and maybe an Army brigade in country for training purposes? What if we had kept the Baghdad government firmly under our thumb?

Just consider what we could have had: our Treasury reimbursed and Iraq a client state, strategically located between Syria and Iran. There would probably be no ISIS, and negotiations with Iran would have taken on a completely different tenor. And all our casualties wouldn’t have been for nothing.

Joe Lipiec

Jupiter, Fla.


.
bojulay's Avatar
I wonder if all the political ass covering Liberals in Washington
that voted for it Would??
LexusLover's Avatar
I wonder if all the political ass covering Liberals in Washington that voted for it Would?? Originally Posted by bojulay
Before November 2016 ... we'll find out ......



Before November 2016 ... we'll find out ...... Originally Posted by LexusLover
Ahhh, a couple of LL's fav --- or--- ite irrelevant pics.

Whenever LLIdiot is getting his worthless ass handed to him, his fall-back position has always been:

... to post ... yet another ... irrelevant pic ... or ... pics ...

Back on topic:

LLIdiot ... knowing then .... what is known now ... would you have supported ... the ill fated ... and ill advised ... Spring of 2003 ... invasion of ... Iraq ???

Yes ... or ... No ???

For the record:

... I ... WOULD NOT ... have supported ... the invasion ... (then ... or ... now) ...

How 'bout you, LLIdiot?
I wonder if all the political ass covering Liberals in Washington
that voted for it Would?? Originally Posted by bojulay
You could ask the same question to conservatives, oh right never ask your side...
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 06-02-2015, 07:57 AM
I wonder if all the political ass covering Liberals in Washington
that voted for it Would?? Originally Posted by bojulay
You do understand that Clinton voting for the Bush lies is what cost her the Presidency in 2008?

WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 06-02-2015, 07:59 AM
Letter to the WSJ:


....The question is, with what you know now would you still have gone to that school, taken that job, rented that apartment or invaded Iraq?

Since the Iraq question has been asked, it brings to mind others that never get asked, let alone answered. Here are a few. Knowing what we know now, would we still have allowed the State Department to reconstruct Iraq? Would we have disbanded the Iraqi army? Would we have given up control of the Iraqi oil industry? Would things be different and better had we kept a Marine regimental combat team and maybe an Army brigade in country for training purposes? What if we had kept the Baghdad government firmly under our thumb?

Just consider what we could have had: our Treasury reimbursed and Iraq a client state, strategically located between Syria and Iran. There would probably be no ISIS, and negotiations with Iran would have taken on a completely different tenor. And all our casualties wouldn’t have been for nothing.

Joe Lipiec

Jupiter, Fla.

. Originally Posted by lustylad
Please show me the part in the Constitution where invading countries stands out?
  • shanm
  • 06-02-2015, 11:11 AM
I wonder if all the political ass covering Liberals in Washington
that voted for it Would?? Originally Posted by bojulay
I believe the number that voted AGAINST stands at 21 democrats to 1 measly repubtard.

So, either way, they're still winning.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 06-02-2015, 11:22 AM
I believe the number that voted AGAINST stands at 21 democrats to 1 measly repubtard.

So, either way, they're still winning. Originally Posted by shanm
United States House of Representatives[edit]

215 (96.4%) of 223 Republican Representatives voted for the resolution.
82 (39.2%) of 209 Democratic Representatives voted for the resolution.
6 (<2.7%) of 223 Republican Representatives voted against the resolution: Reps. Duncan (R-TN), Hostettler (R-IN), Houghton (R-NY), Leach (R-IA), Morella (R-MD), Paul (R-TX).
126 (~60.3%) of 209 Democratic Representatives voted against the resolution.


The only Independent Representative voted against the resolution: Rep. Sanders (I-VT)



United States Senate[edit]



58% of Democratic senators (29 of 50) voted for the resolution. Those voting for the resolution are: 42% of Democratic senators (21 of 50) voted against the resolution. Those voting against the resolution are: 1 (2%) of 49 Republican senators voted against the resolution: Sen. Chafee (R-RI).
The only independent senator voted against the resolution: Sen. Jeffords (I-VT)



Those that would still vote for it LexusLover, JD and our resident Tranny, LustyLadyBoy
LexusLover's Avatar
[B]
United States Senate[edit]

of Democratic senators voted for the resolution. Those voting for the resolution are:


Joe Biden

John Kerry

Hillary Clinton

Originally Posted by WTF
Thanks for the reminder.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 06-02-2015, 06:08 PM
Thanks for the reminder. Originally Posted by LexusLover
42% of the Senate Democrats voted against it and 2% of the GOP controlled Senate voted against it.

And of course you would still vote for it! Not that your vote matters.
And of course you would still vote for it! Originally Posted by WTF
Of course LLIdiot "would still vote for it."

But he doesn't have the balls to admit it.

Yes indeed, LL is a nutless wonder!
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 06-02-2015, 06:55 PM

Yes indeed, LL is a nutless wonder! Originally Posted by bigtex
I think he wonders why he is nutless....it is because of his failure to answer simple questions for fear of being wrong.
I think he wonders why he is nutless....it is because of his failure to answer simple questions for fear of being wrong. Originally Posted by WTF
LLIdiot clearly lacks the courage of his convictions.

This friggin' coward is running and hiding from a simple "yes or no" question.

He's all talk ... no action!

This guy's toast ... get a rope!