$5 a gallon

If you thought Senile Biden was utterly inept, check out Cackling Kamala:

REPORTER: "How long should Americans expect — how long should we be bracing for — this historic inflation and some unprecedented gas prices?"

KAMALA HARRIS: ...............

Watch:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1502301540962476032 Originally Posted by berryberry

WTF did that even mean? Her answer had absolutely nothing to do with the question.

I try to be respectful but this so called adult has less brains than a slug

I try to be respectful but this so called adult has less brains than a slug Originally Posted by chizzy

Modeling the same obstinate bullshit that's been pushed down other's throats. Only, anyone who's actually read the AFPM links or looks at the EIA reports knows what dots connect.

We're not here to change minds, remember? Post what you feel like posting. Ignore the rest.

WTF did that even mean? Her answer had absolutely nothing to do with the question. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Indeed - not only did her babbling answer not even come close to addressing the question, but Cackling Kamala didn't even know the question was for her - she looked to the Poland President to answer it.

It's extremely hard to be more incompetent than Senile Biden - but Cackling Kamala is giving him a run for his money

But no worries, the libtards will make excuses and babble on about dots, treason or other nonsensical shit to try and distract

If you thought Senile Biden was utterly inept, check out Cackling Kamala:

REPORTER: "How long should Americans expect — how long should we be bracing for — this historic inflation and some unprecedented gas prices?"

KAMALA HARRIS: ...............

Watch:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1502301540962476032 Originally Posted by berryberry

Democrat Tulsi Gabbard - Kamala Harris' disastrous trip to Poland reveals again just how dangerous it is for her to be only a heartbeat away from being president of the United States. This is the danger of choosing/appointing leaders based upon their gender/race and their loyalty to the Washington elite.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1502586598541586433

Just a reminder - The keystone pipeline expansion was proposed in 2008 and expected to be completed in 2013.

But Obama/Biden stopped it. Senile Biden said then he was proud to stop it.

Democrats have been stopping domestic energy production for decades.

High gas prices are absolutely Senile Biden and the Democrats fault - and any “reporter” not making this clear is a propagandist for the ruling party.

How much domestic oil would XL have carried? How much Canadian?

How much of that oil is still being brought in today via other pipelines or by truck or rail?

Just a reminder. Facts matter. Context matters. You're ignoring that again.

And it's not just oil. Senile Biden's war on fossil fuels is impacting natural gas as well - which in turn impacts electric costs

Natural gas price

Two years ago: $1.8
One year ago: $2.6
Now: $4.73

Gas prices have been going up since Senile Biden took office.
This is the Senile Biden gas hike!

The more pipelines you build, the more you make gas a global commodity, and subject to global pricing. Just like gasoline or oil. The oil that comes from the Canadian sands and would normally be entering into that pipeline, still comes to the US. It just comes on rail, truck or smaller lines.

I remember when Donald's solution was to "bring back beautiful clean coal". You remember that? How did that work out?

The oil that comes from the Canadian sands and would normally be entering into that pipeline, still comes to the US.
Originally Posted by eyecu2

Pure misinformation !!! Some tar sands oil may still come from Canada but not the same volume that would come via the Keystone Pipeline. In addition, the cost to transport is higher by truck or rail and the risk to the environment is greater

But hey, keep on pretending cancelling the Keystone XL pipeline had zero impact

Why don't you prove me wrong then Berry. Tell me how the tar sands oil is not making it to the US for refining. Of course a larger pipeline may be a cheaper mechanism of transport, but it's not the only mechanism and that's the point.

Why don't you prove me wrong then Berry. Originally Posted by eyecu2

I think he already did with this post:

https://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=106...9&postcount=75

And you don't have to take berry's word for it either. It comes straight from the mouth of Alberta's Premier!

Alberta’s Premier Jason Kenney said... “We could discuss how to ship nearly 1 million barrels a day of responsibly produced energy every day from the USA’s closest friend and ally! All it would take is his approval for Keystone XL. Easy.”

Yes I already proved him wrong before. And then there is this

A persistent obstacle for Alberta oil production has been the transportation of oil from interior Canada to major markets. Lack of capacity in existing pipelines has bottlenecked production, and presently 500,000 barrels per day enter the U.S. by rail, adding $15 to $22 per barrel to the price tag.

The current suite of pipelines – the Enbridge Mainline, Keystone, and Trans Mountain – were 98% full in late 2018, and plans for additional pipelines have been in the works for more than a decade.

The Keystone XL pipeline would have added 830,000 barrels per day of export capacity, carrying oil from Alberta to Nebraska where the pipeline would have linked into existing segments of the Keystone pipeline system.

That's good info and I'm sure it can be readily confirmed if anyone cares to do their homework.

Even if Keystone XL completion didn't add a single barrel to our daily Canadian import capacity, it would STILL be a no-brainer since pipeline delivery is cheaper, faster, cleaner and safer than truck or rail.

And consider this - we could conceivably do BOTH, i.e. deliver as much as possible via pipeline PLUS continue to use truck & rail. It sure beats having Biden and Blinken send emissaries to rogue nations like Venezuela and Iran begging for their oil, after years of our banning it and sanctioning anyone else who bought it. Don't the dim-retards know how stupid they are making the US look?

Not sure why eye keeps clinging to such weak anti-pipeline arguments. Maybe it's because he just can't bring himself to agree with Berry on anything.

Yes I already proved him wrong before. And then there is this

A persistent obstacle for Alberta oil production has been the transportation of oil from interior Canada to major markets. Lack of capacity in existing pipelines has bottlenecked production, and presently 500,000 barrels per day enter the U.S. by rail, adding $15 to $22 per barrel to the price tag.

The current suite of pipelines – the Enbridge Mainline, Keystone, and Trans Mountain – were 98% full in late 2018, and plans for additional pipelines have been in the works for more than a decade.

The Keystone XL pipeline would have added 830,000 barrels per day of export capacity, carrying oil from Alberta to Nebraska where the pipeline would have linked into existing segments of the Keystone pipeline system. Originally Posted by berryberry

Would you like to post the link to Karin's whole article? Or should I?