wasn't the OP about the fucking bike helmets?OF COURSE IT WAS.
Attachment 260172 Originally Posted by JCM800
But IBHankerwrong will never admit that.
wasn't the OP about the fucking bike helmets?OF COURSE IT WAS.
Attachment 260172 Originally Posted by JCM800
You're projecting again, Ekim the Inbred Chimp
You have the intellect and emotional maturity of a distraught, six-month-old, yapping Chihuahua, you stupid, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. The post at #2 addresses the OP whereas you've admitted you've ignorantly continued to post without even having read the thread, you stupid, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.
You who posts in bold, red letters are a genuine, lib-retarded hypocrite, MasterDickMuncher. You were being derisive of the Washington DC Metropolitan Police when you summarily dismissed their riot training and equipment and labeled them as "Park Police" in post #3: your first post in this thread, MasterDickMuncher.
Those "Park Rangers" you're ignorantly deriding in the highlighted picture you just reposted are wearing "Washington DC Metropolitan Police" patches on their uniforms, CBJ7. They are trained in crowd control; they are wearing riot gear and the are carrying weapons: riot batons.
"Riot police are police who are organized, deployed, trained or equipped to confront crowds, protests or riots. Riot police may be regular police who act in the role of riot police ....
"Riot police often use special equipment termed riot gear to help protect themselves and attack others. Riot gear typically includes personal armor, batons, riot shields and riot helmets." Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Desperation + bull shit = In Bred Hankering. Originally Posted by i'va biggenEkim the Inbred Chimp is not intellectually equal to the challenge.
I guess you are ignoring the part where I said I have rad the thread and your bullshit still doesn't make sense.Keep yapping like an insecure little Chihuahua, you stupid, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass.
The bullshit you wrote about batons in Post No. 2 doesn't address anything about the point made in Post No. 1 that bike helmets are worthless as protection in a riot.
That's a fact, asshole.
Nothing that comes AFTER Post No. 2 changes that.
You were just hijacking a thread in between rounds of getting butt-fucked by your tranny friends. Originally Posted by ExNYer
wasn't the OP about the fucking bike helmets?CBJ7's fuckin' "bike helmets" were merely a point of derision for CBJ7 to draw the focus of retards like you and the racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass away from the fact that police wearing riot gear were deployed against WWII veterans in their 80s and 90s, JCM800. You two retards fell for it!
Attachment 260172 Originally Posted by JCM800
OF COURSE IT WAS.CBJ7 admitted to what he was doing -- and kept doing it throughout, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, but of course you didn't read the thread with any comprehension and continued to ignorantly post anyway.
But IBHankerwrong will never admit that. Originally Posted by ExNYer
DAY ELEVEN'S HIGHLIGHT. ANOTHER HUMONGOUS EXPLOSION OF FROTH!Check your Websters, you dumb-fuck golem jackass, the word "pustulent" doesn't exist.
How much farther can you go, Golgathan, before your pustulent head explodes? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
CBJ7's fuckin' "bike helmets" were merely a point of derision for CBJ7 to draw the focus of retards like you and the racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass away from the fact that police wearing riot gear were deployed against WWII veterans in their 80s and 90s, JCM800. You two retards fell for it! Originally Posted by I B Hankeringthe OP was about bike helmet wearing riot police ....you then followed up with explaining what a billy club is.
the OP was about bike helmet wearing riot police ....you then followed up with explaining what a billy club is.You're being totally disingenuous, because you'd find that answer if you bothered to thoroughly read the thread. Note and read MasterDickMuncher's post at #3 and follow the link he cites. Unlike you, MasterDickMuncher understood exactly what was going on when CBJ7 started this thread. It's fascinating that you would claim that you're too stupid to understand.
what does the OP have to do with attacking WWII veterans in their 80s and 90s? Originally Posted by JCM800
You're being totally disingenuous, because you'd find that answer if you bothered to thoroughly read the thread. Note and read MasterDickMuncher's post at #3 and follow the link he cites. Unlike you, MasterDickMuncher understood exactly what was going on when CBJ7 started this thread. It's fascinating that you would claim that you're too stupid to understand. Originally Posted by I B Hankeringthe OP was about the bike helmets.
the OP was about the bike helmets.The OP was a derisive post about the equipment worn by the officers, JCM800. The purpose of CBJ7's was to draw the attention of simpleton retards like you away from the fact that police wearing riot gear were deployed against WWII veterans in their 80s and 90s. Note the word was "deployed", not "attacked", as you very ignorantly suggested, JCM800. Did you not notice the "riot batons", JCM800? Are you going to keep playing "dumb", JCM800?
how many veterans were attacked by the riot police? Originally Posted by JCM800
The OP was a derisive post about the equipment worn by the officers, JCM800. The purpose of CBJ7's was to draw the attention of simpleton retards like you away from the fact that police wearing riot gear were deployed against WWII veterans in their 80s and 90s. Note the word was "deployed", not "attacked", as you very ignorantly suggested, JCM800. Did you not notice the "riot batons", JCM800? Are you going to keep playing "dumb", JCM800? Originally Posted by I B Hankeringthe OP was about the bike helmets.
the OP was about the bike helmets.Yeah, you're going to continue to play dumb, JCM800: if you're actually playing. CBJ7, on the other hand, has already admitted that he took the picture from the other thread where this argument began and continued to make derisive remarks in this thread about the officers' "equipment" in general, JCM800. Evidence:
you then have made it about the batons that are being carried by riot police that were deployed to do what then? Originally Posted by JCM800
gotta love those bicycle helmets with NO face sheilds ... every riot cop should have one
Originally Posted by CJ7
I sure wouldn't go into battle against those guys without a knee shield Originally Posted by CJ7
the brother on the right of the pic tucked his bike pants in his Reebok Hi Tops Originally Posted by CJ7
JD posted those pics portraying them as riot cops attacking 90 year old WWII vets ... both are bullshit
I reposted them pointing out JD's bullshit Originally Posted by CJ7
Yeah, you're going to continue to play dumb, JCM800: if you're actually playing. CBJ7, on the other hand, has already admitted that he took the picture from the other thread where this argument began and continued to make derisive remarks in this thread about the officers' "equipment" in general, JCM800. Evidence: Originally Posted by I B Hankering...and then you turned the thread into riot police "deployed" with riot batons out to harm veterans instead of the bike helmets.
...and then you turned the thread into riot police "deployed" with riot batons out to harm veterans instead of the bike helmets.You are playing dumb, JCM800! Especially since CBJ7 has already admitted he took that photo from the other thread for the purpose of ridiculing how the officers' were dressed and equipped -- and CBJ7continued to make fun of their equipment throughout the thread. Do you not accept CBJ7's blatant statement admitting what he was doing?
who's playing dumb? Originally Posted by JCM800
... riot cops ... bullshit
I reposted them pointing out JD's bullshit Originally Posted by CJ7
gotta love those bicycle helmets with NO face sheilds ... every riot cop should have one
Originally Posted by CJ7
once again the OP was about bike helmets.
Go screw yourself, CBJ7, you Odumbo-tron moron.
"A truncheon or baton (also called a cosh, billystick, billy club, nightstick, sap, blackjack, stick) is essentially a club of less than arm's length made of wood, plastic, or metal. They are carried for forced compliance and self-defense by law-enforcement officers, correctional staff, security-industry employees and (less often) military personnel. Other uses for truncheons and batons include crowd control or the dispersal of belligerent or non-compliant people.
A truncheon or baton may be used to strike, jab, block, bludgeon and aid in the application of armlocks. Sometimes, they also are employed as weapons by criminals and other law-breakers because of their easy concealment." Originally Posted by I B Hankering