YummyMarie: a place for her random ideas, thoughts, and musings

cb, hard-on's are awesome. Outting personal info is not.

cb, hard-on's are awesome. Outting personal info is not. Originally Posted by YummyMarie

But , but , but posting Selfies all over the internet of one self does not make sense if you are actually worried about being outted.

Either you are worried about these continued Selfies exposing you to danger or not. It appears not. So there was no danger only perceived danger on your part but not enough perceived danger to have you take down personal pictures of yourself?

Something is not adding up here.

. Unfortunately, someone with a hard-on for me used enough intimidation for me to believe they would share my personal information in several ways, so alas, all you get are blurred images of my visage. Originally Posted by YummyMarie

Methinks that WTF has met the muse Melpomene.
Simply tragic presentation of concepts.

Perhaps we can wish that he...
Oh, a unicorns shadow, um, nevermind I'll be busy the rest of the day.

Methinks that WTF has met the muse Melpomene.
Simply tragic presentation of concepts.

Perhaps we can wish that he...
Oh, a unicorns shadow, um, nevermind I'll be busy the rest of the day. Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

Me thinks you and Yummy have met Narcissus and Echo

Unique_Carpenter Nobody post Selfies if they are worried about personal information being exposed as was claimed.

As usual, WTF persistently doesn’t understand what he reads in a post prior to responding to it. And, as usual, I have to step in and take his post apart via a fact check.

First, I thought I was replying to the other thread, not this one. I could’ve sworn that I clicked the link for the other thread.

Second, think about the meaning of that statement.

Nowhere in that statement did I imply or explicitly state that I found that [mommy tuck] sexually stimulating. Anybody that has been hobbying for a while, I’ve been doing so for over a quarter of a century, will not see many of a providers “less advertised features” until the remainder of the clothing come off.

What then? In the vast majority of the cases where I’ve found myself in this situation, there was still enough “attractiveness” about the provider to continue the session. If she made me live up to my username real good, the mommy tuck was no issue.



Wrong, just as you were wrong in our previous arguments. If I were “wired” like a woman, I wouldn’t take yet another opportunity to fact check your commentary ad infinitum, the way I’m doing it here, continuing a trend that spans years.

Also, your implication that “I” found that attractive is nothing but a strawman, and doesn’t factor into account my username, and what I have to find as one of the attractive assets before I contact a provider.



Let me explain what a strawman is.

Person “A” advances statement “X.”

Person “B” advances statement “Y,” a warped version of statement “X.”

Person “B” claims that “X” is wrong, then erroneously attributes that conclusion to the statement and/or to the author of that statement.

My statement was clearly from the standpoint of my user name. Mainly, that women that theoretically made me live up to my username the way I liked, would make me forget their “tummy tucks” if they had one.

Your response? You jumped on here, barely understanding what you were reading… but driven by “hurting still/past animosity” because of the past arguments where I took you apart consistently, ad infinitum… You advanced a strawman erroneously categorizing me based on your misunderstanding of my post.

Or, you couldn’t move on from the previous arguments we had, so you couldn’t avoid another opportunity to take a swing.

Again, any hobbyist in the hobby would know, and experience, situations where what they saw in the photo wasn’t completely the case during a face to face. Reality kicks in and you determine whether she has enough overall attractiveness to continue on or not.

Even you would’ve had that experience, despite what you claim here:



First, the most expensive woman you’re going to have is your wife, if not wife, girlfriend. Based on this fact, you’re telling us that every woman that you’ve ever been with had a stomach similar to what you show in the picture.

Based on what you said elsewhere on this website, I don’t believe that.

Second, if you hobbied, then every woman that you had a session with looked like that. Judging by the mismatch between what you read, and what you ultimately type, there’s an excellent chance that you too have easily came across a situation where you had less than what you labeled as perfect… unless these women were willing to flash you in exchange for a session with you. I doubt it.

I’ve also asked you “YES/NO” questions, in our previous arguments, that you continue to refuse to answer. As long as you’re going to continue to take swipes at me, I’m holding you accountable to answering those questions.

Since I’ve saved my replies to you from those previous arguments, finding those questions, and reposting them on a future reply, would be an easy thing to do. Originally Posted by herfacechair

The Nizkhor Project

The Nizkhor Project Originally Posted by YummyMarie

Let us get the facts straight.

I have pointed out that this is a musing thread not a personal threAD invented just for you...after you continually post Selfies.

You then pointed out that you have to blur your face

That's a great point. If have a history of posting pics before and after makeup, so I'm good either way. . Originally Posted by YummyMarie

Which had zero to do with my point you posting Selfies in what you are trying to turn into a threAD. A Straw Man on your part. I then pointed out what appeared to be a another fallacy on your part.

. Unfortunately, someone with a hard-on for me used enough intimidation for me to believe they would share my personal information in several ways, so alas, all you get are blurred images of my visage. Originally Posted by YummyMarie

Folks that cry about someone trying to out them would not post Selfies on the internet, especially on an escort site.

Ah, WTF, nice try. It is tragic that you again miss the point; which can be sharp.
I have met a woodland nymph, a sea nymph (pirate wench) and a sky nymph (stewardess) and embraced them all.
Alas, I have not been to Westchase or Galveston since 2011.
You should consider that all of the muses are sisters or cousins, and understand that they encompass all aspects of knowledge, from tragic and comedy (in your case) to love (perhaps missing for you). Which knowledge encompasses everything posted in this thread, or the entire board (yes including tragic).
Perhaps you should consider my Shakespeare quote below.
Btw, it's not a shadow, and there's a gal riding.

Ah
Btw, it's not a shadow, and there's a gal riding. Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

Yet you come back to post




Catch the Unicorn...

Yet you come back to post Originally Posted by WTF

We wait for the cool of the evening. Does not everyman wish fir a woman by day and a goddess at night?

We wait for the cool of the evening. Does not everyman wish fir a woman by day and a goddess at night? Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

I getting up there...a Goddess by day...a good pillow at night.

I getting up there...a Goddess by day...a good pillow at night. Originally Posted by WTF

Sigh, slightly closer, but a long voyage ahead.

Consider:
If someone were to propose that a cowgirl ex-barrel racer could ride anything, including a Unicorn, or a Pegasus, I would agree. This is an example of where you could to be in your dreamscape. Instead, you've been insisting that there are boundries to what a muse can do.

Sigh, slightly closer, but a long voyage ahead.

Consider:
If someone were to propose that a cowgirl ex-barrel racer could ride anything, including a Unicorn, or a Pegasus, I would agree. This is an example of where you could to be in your dreamscape. Instead, you've been insisting that there are boundries to what a muse can do. Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

A wonderful muse does not have to advertise what a wonderful muse they are are now do they? Can they? Why yes I suppose they can but it would seem to defeat the purpose.

That is what we have going on here UC.



.

A wonderful muse does not have to advertise what a wonderful muse they are are now do they? Can they? Why yes I suppose they can but it would seem to defeat the purpose. Originally Posted by WTF

But is there a purpose? And if there's actually a purpose, how is that to be stated?
I do note that "random ideas, thoughts and musings" pretty much leaves an open continuum within which anything would be valid.

Do please enlighten us as to your definition of purpose.
Note that I'll be off line at the barn for a while.

Dors this site have a football team because it seems like she must of sucked all of them off including the coaches and a llot or at least the right dicks to get this much free advertising . Not even that man booty topic in main co-ed is centered around one barely average looking hooker .