trump the traitor

Oh my- why are you on a fuck board? That's nothing compared to what is said here on ECCIE. Oh I forgot you're a female,that's right so I guess that would bother you.
Sugar , just go ahead and wear that pussy hat - it should fit you Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

Yup we're on a fuck board.
This douche deluxe is POTUS(though his days are numbered as he will be leaving sooner rather than later,prolly in cuffs).
Keep slurping the gravy infused Rovian Kool-Aid...

There is NO evidence Loughner was influenced by conservatives Originally Posted by Zhivago52

Sarah may have a pretty good case for libel this time...

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/14/ny...piracy-theory/

Yet another retraction from the lying New York Times.

Hope her lawsuit puts them out of business.

You can't win intellectually... So instead, you advocate killing the POTUS.

You carry this neanderthal logic any further and you may end up in prison for the short remainder of your life. Originally Posted by Cap'n Crunch

Exactly! I've been trying to explain that to your pal Little Monster but he won't listen. Maybe you can get through to the dickhead.

I really do hope someone shoots and kills this Son of a Bitch... Originally Posted by Little Monster

I call bullshit. Post those comments you saw on here, millsy. Let's see how they compare with Little Monster advocating for someone to kill the POTUS. Originally Posted by lustylad

CRICKETS!

Anytime you call his bluff, poor millsy quietly slinks away with his tail between his legs...

Translation: "I'm a pussy."
You wouldn't know 'intellect' if it walked up and bit you on the ass. Originally Posted by gfejunkie

Ahh, so you are actually an intellectual masquerading as a clueless imbecile. Wow, you play that part to perfection!

The Washington Post? LMFAO! They've been caught in so many lies lately it's fucking ridiculous! Originally Posted by gfejunkie

"caught in so many lies lately it's fucking ridiculous" And what were these "lies" they were caught telling lately? And don't come back to me with one or two misrepresentations or items that can be read two ways. I want to hear about "so many lies lately it's fucking ridiculous!!" And please reference your Breitbart sources.

Get back to me when you find somebody who is willing to go on the record. Until then it's just more FAKE NEWS. Originally Posted by gfejunkie

Mark Corallo, a spokesman for Trump's personal lawyer, had responded Wednesday evening to the Post report by saying: "The FBI leak of information regarding the president is outrageous, inexcusable and illegal."

Notice how he did not say "inaccurate." And saying "illegal" is like admitting he is under investigation.

I guarantee you Trump is not smiling about any of this. It's all fake fake news. (i.e real news, grandpa)

Hahahaha I could give a flying fuck that a 70 yr old, bad tan, horrible hair, wrinkled, dumb, over the hill provider thinks of me... I almost feel sorry for you. But then I remember you get what you deserve. Good luck with those issues you have coming. I really mean it. Originally Posted by Austin Dude

You're a class act, millsy. A gentleman and a scholar. A brilliant debater who always sticks to facts and logic and never gets personal.

To whom do we credit the dazzling charm and forensic ability you display on this board? Your doting parents? Or the 7 years you spent trying to earn a degree at UT?

Sarah may have a pretty good case for libel this time...

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/14/ny...piracy-theory/

Yet another retraction from the lying New York Times.

Hope her lawsuit puts them out of business. Originally Posted by gfejunkie

Come back to us after Sarah wins her lawsuit... In other words, you won't be coming back to us about it!

This genius calls The Times and The Post "Fake News" because they have a left-center bias.

Washington Post and New York Times


Yet he has no problem quoting strongly biased right wing propaganda. Now THAT couldn't possibly be fake news, right?

Daily Caller


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-caller/

LOL, at least try to give us something right-center next time, ok, pal?

Once again you really are an easy opponent... Originally Posted by Little Monster

Hahaha... Nice to know crunchyass is too much of a pussy to reply, so he has to ask his pal limeydick to come to his "rescue".

Yeah, that worked out well. Now we have two libtards who are too scared and stupid to talk substance.

You can't win intellectually, because there is no intellectual argument to support Trump. So instead, you advocate mass killings of Americans.

You carry this neanderthal logic any further and you may end up in prison for the short remainder of your life. Originally Posted by Cap'n Crunch

Exactly! I've been trying to explain that to your pal Little Monster but he won't listen. . Originally Posted by lustylad

Dear lustyturd, the eminently weak Trump-humper,

You can't win intellectually, so you go edit and change my post. Try to make a point without inaccurately quoting people.

Little Monster easily dispatches you. So in response, you drop another turd and lie about a post.

You are so weak and so overmatched.

...too scared and stupid to talk substance. Originally Posted by lustylad

As Little Monster proved in his response, your posts lack substance and are easy to tear apart. LM embarrassed you masterfully.

But actually, the words "scared and stupid" brings us back to you, lustyturd. The guy too scare and stupid to back up your loud talk about "Obama wiretapping Trump." Yeah, it is THE story, huh? For a moment, let's all pretend Trump isn't being investigated for possible obstruction of justice. Oh no, we still have the discredited conspiracy theory that only dimwitted jizz-sucking Trump lovers bought into!

That sounds scandalous, crunchyass! But let's try to reserve judgment until we see the transcript of the meeting, ok?

You do have a transcript, right? The one that came from Obama's wiretap of the Trump campaign?

Ooopsie! Did I just spill the beans? Did I just say Obama wiretapped the political opposition's campaign headquarters?

Oh, fuck! Silly me. Isn't that how Watergate started? We're not supposed to do those things, are we? I mean, wiretapping and surveillance of your opponent's campaign? Who would stoop so low? As an ex-President used to say "That's not who we are!"

Tsk, tsk, tsk... oh well, at least now we're looking at a REAL scandal! Originally Posted by lustylad

Ahh yes, REAL scandal!

Come on, explain how you fell hook line and sinker for this Trump lie. Or slink away again, scared and stupid, like the sad weak fuck you are.

Come back to us after Sarah wins her lawsuit... In other words, you won't be coming back to us about it!

This genius calls The Times and The Post "Fake News" because they have a left-center bias.

Washington Post and New York Times


Yet he has no problem quoting strongly biased right wing propaganda. Now THAT couldn't possibly be fake news, right?

Daily Caller


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-caller/

LOL, at least try to give us something right-center next time, ok, pal? Originally Posted by Cap'n Crunch

http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-pol...ow-no-limits-0

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...ated-ignorance

"caught in so many lies lately it's fucking ridiculous" And what were these "lies" they were caught telling lately? And don't come back to me with one or two misrepresentations or items that can be read two ways. I want to hear about "so many lies lately it's fucking ridiculous!!" And please reference your Breitbart sources. Originally Posted by Cap'n Crunch

http://www.dailywire.com/news/16646/...eek-john-nolte

Need more?

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/388842-wa...-russia-trump/

LOL, at least try to give us something right-center next time, ok, pal? Originally Posted by Cap'n Crunch

Here you go, jack-ass. They even bash Alex Jones for ya...

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slate..._so_wrong.html

Oh I said "they" and yet you knew I was talking about one person by what I said in the post? ... I guess you don't say we when you're talking about your favorite team? Originally Posted by Austin Dude

Umm, try to keep up with your own fumbles, ok millsy?

You admitted to Zhivago52 you were talking about Jared Loughner when you said "They shot a Democratic congresswoman and 6 people died that day."

If you were not just talking about one person (Jared Loughner), then say so and tell us who else you were referring to. That's not so hard, is it?

What "team" was Jared Loughner playing for when he shot Gabby Giffords?

For a moment, let's all pretend Trump isn't being investigated for possible obstruction of justice. Oh no, we still have the discredited conspiracy theory that only dimwitted jizz-sucking Trump lovers bought into!

Ahh yes, REAL scandal!

Come on, explain how you fell hook line and sinker for this Trump lie. Originally Posted by Cap'n Crunch

Having trouble keeping up, crunchyass? I guess you missed those subpoenas recently issued by the House Intelligence Committee to the FBI, the CIA and the NSA. So much for calling it a "discredited conspiracy theory" lol!

Looks like we may soon learn the full extent to which ozombies like John Brennan, Susan Rice and Samantha Powers were spying on the Trump campaign and transition teams. Won't that be fascinating! Think about it! Reading intel transcripts of eavesdropped conversations of your political opponents discussing strategy... ain't this a great country???

Now c'mon, crunchyass... explain why you won't answer MY question to YOU about this scandal. Are you too skeered, too stupid, or both?

...try to imagine if Donald Trump were to use the same intelligence agencies in the same fashion to gather information on his political opponents. Would that be a problem? Originally Posted by lustylad

http://www.dailywire.com/news/16646/...eek-john-nolte

Need more?

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/388842-wa...-russia-trump/
Originally Posted by gfejunkie

LMFAO!!!!! You quoted far right propaganda and Russian News!!!!! OMG! you are even more clueless than I had wildly imagined!

DAILY WIRE


They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-daily-wire/


RT, originally Russia Today, is a television network funded by the Russian government. It operates cable and satellite television channels directed to audiences outside of Russia as well as providing Internet content in various languages, including Russian. It has right of center coverage of the USA. Highly biased toward Russia and occasionally runs Pro-state conspiracy stories.

Honest to God, You are quoting Russia news and trust that over legitimate US news sources? WTF is the matter with you? Wow, your quoted sources speak volumes for your ignorance, stupidity and possible lack of patriotism.