I have voted for exactly one Democrat for national office in my life. Obama. Why??? McCain/Palin was an option I just could not consider. Sarah Palin being a heartbeat from the Presidency??? No f***king way. And in 2012 I personally considered myself better off than I was in 2008 so I voted for Obama again. Libertard?? No idea how you define a Libertard, but I think not.
You are very good at pointing out reasons why we are where we are, but offer very little help in proposing solutions.
BTW, according to the website below, Texas, with Conservatives holding most statewide offices, had a much higher murder rate per 100,000 population and a higher gun murder rate per 100,000 population than the Liberal state of Illinois. Try again.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_vio...tates_by_state
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
You’re a Libertard, Speedy! Look at yourself in the mirror and define yourself. BTW, the FBI is a better source for crime data than wiki, Speedy, and the FBI data shows that you are ignorantly wrong: Illinois’ homicide rate is higher than Texas’. Try again, Speedy.
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr...tables/table-4
I love it. You have an excuse for everything.. Here's some data for 10 years of homicides (15,807 total) in Texas and the reasons for the homicides. Data just does not support your lame opinion. Do your homework and you won't come off so much as a Conservatard.
http://projects.wsj.com/murderdata/#view=all&geo=TX
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
Gang-Related Violent Crime
“Gang-related crime and violence continues to rise. NGIC analysis indicates that gang members are responsible for an average of 48 percent of violent crime in most jurisdictions and much higher in others.
Some jurisdictions in Arizona, California, Colorado, Illinois, Massachusetts, Oklahoma, and
Texas report that gangs are responsible for at least 90 percent of crime. A comparison of FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) 2009 violent crime data and 2010 NGIC gang data illustrates that regions experiencing the most violent crime—including southern California, Texas, and Florida—also have a substantial gang presence (see Figure 1 and Map 1).
Street gangs are involved in a host of violent criminal activities, including assault,
drug trafficking, extortion, firearms offenses, home invasion robberies,
homicide, intimidation, shootings, and weapons trafficking.
NDIC reporting indicates that gang control over drug distribution and disputes over drug territory has increased, which may be responsible for the increase in violence in many areas. Conflict between gangs, gang migration into rival gang territory, and the release of incarcerated gang members back into the community has also resulted in an increase in gang-related crime and violence in many jurisdictions, according to NGIC reporting.”
http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/pu...eat-assessment
A bloody November means Dallas has already seen more murders than in 2011
"As is often the case, many of the recent murders involve drugs, including people killing others in drug-induced rages, drug-related robberies gone bad and disputes over drug transactions."
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime...an-in-2011.ece
Los Zetas drug gang penetrated U.S. American quarter horse industry says FBI
“This investigation reveals the varied attempts by
Mexican drug cartels to further their criminal enterprises by any means necessary,” stated FBI Special Agent in Charge Armando Fernandez.
“This case is a prime example of the ability of
Mexican drug cartels to establish footholds in legitimate U.S. industries and highlights the serious threat money laundering causes to our financial system,” said IRS Criminal Investigation Chief Weber.
http://www.examiner.com/article/los-...ustry-says-fbi
. . .and the tendency by some posters to use drug gangs as an excuse to explain US's statistics v. other countries with similar demographics. How many Los Zetas are there in the U.K., essence? Please provide a citation at your leisure, essence.
To be honest, all these comparisons are pretty meaningless as no two countries have the same demographics and history. Fascinatingly misinterpreted, essence, considering Speedy was the one that initiated such comparisons, but then he wanted to ignore other comparisons which were just as “relevant” as his original assertions.
Originally Posted by essence