I don't think anyone believes Trump will be convicted. Impeached very possibly. Convicted, no way. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXXBefore Lindsey Graham realized Trump had indeed asked for a Quid Pro Quo (Aid for Investigation into Bidens)....he was talking about how bad that might be. Turns out none of our right wing friends who claimed there was no Quid Pro Quo are willing to claim that anymore.
I don't think anyone believes Trump will be convicted. Impeached very possibly. Convicted, no way. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXXThe Democrats don't have a strong enough case to convict Trump and have him removed from office and they know it. In fact their push for impeachment is pretty flimsy. What the Democrats are essentially trying to do is get the voters to reject the idea of reelecting him. If Trump is impeached but not removed from office he can still run for a second term and possibly be reelected.
Before Lindsey Graham realized Trump had indeed asked for a Quid Pro Quo (Aid for Investigation into Bidens)....he was talking about how bad that might be. Turns out none of our right wing friends who claimed there was no Quid Pro Quo are willing to claim that anymore.I dunno if anyone can decipher your baby-talk babble post but I'll try - YES it would be BAD if Ukraine took all our foreign aid money and failed to shine a spotlight on the Bidens' corrupt activities there.
If Trump is impeached but not removed from office he can still run for a second term and possibly be reelected. Originally Posted by Levianon17Yeah, and he can run as an unfairly maligned victim and survivor of multiple witch hunts and coup attempts by hysterical dim-retards and deep-state subversives who will not hesitate to shit on the Constitution to get their way!
Yeah, and he can run as an unfairly maligned victim and survivor of multiple witch hunts and coup attempts by hysterical dim-retards and deep-state subversives who will not hesitate to shit on the Constitution to get their way!your side says this constantly, yet you bitch about the Witch Hunt and the nothing burgers. seems you should WANT the inquiry to go as it has, so Trump can run as that maligned victim. we agree conviction is out of play. so why fight the inquiry like you do? if I thought like you, I would put Guiliani, Barr, Mulvaney, all of them before the Committee, and act civil. what is there to lose?
Thank you shifty! Originally Posted by lustylad
I'll try - YES it would be BAD if Ukraine took all our foreign aid money and failed to shine a spotlight on the Bidens' corrupt activities there.Please point out any corrupt/illegal activities. Hunter Biden got paid to do nothing. His Dad helped get rid of the Special Prosecutor who was doing nothing to look into corruption that the company that Hunter Biden was on was accused of prior to Biden being on the Board.
However, thanks to the dim-retards holding these silly hearings, everyone is indeed being educated on just how fucking corrupt the Bidens are!
! Originally Posted by lustylad
His Dad helped get rid of the Special Prosecutor who was doing nothing to look into corruption that the company that Hunter Biden was on was accused of prior to Biden being on the Board.these Individuals IGNORE timelines every time. it fucks their narrative.
You need to study up on timelines before posting again about this subject. Originally Posted by WTF
your side says this constantly, yet you bitch about the Witch Hunt and the nothing burgers. seems you should WANT the inquiry to go as it has, so Trump can run as that maligned victim. we agree conviction is out of play. so why fight the inquiry like you do? if I thought like you, I would put Guiliani, Barr, Mulvaney, all of them before the Committee, and act civil. what is there to lose? Originally Posted by Chung TranHey, why doesn't Shifty let the Republicans call Joe and Hunter Biden, Devon Archer, Alexandra Chalupa, Nellie Ohr and Eric Ciaramella as witnesses before the Committee?
Please point out any corrupt/illegal activities. Hunter Biden got paid to do nothing. His Dad helped get rid of the Special Prosecutor who was doing nothing to look into corruption that the company that Hunter Biden was on was accused of prior to Biden being on the Board.That's where the corruption could be. Would Burisma hire just anyone 50 thousand a month to do nothing?
Sounds like his Dad did the right thing and Hunter took money for being on the Board like all the Board members. Nothing illegal about that. Kinda like Donnie and his flame Kim taking money to speak....you think anyone would pay for those two if his Dad wasn't President?
You need to study up on timelines before posting again about this subject.
your side says this constantly, yet you bitch about the Witch Hunt and the nothing burgers. seems you should WANT the inquiry to go as it has, so Trump can run as that maligned victim. we agree conviction is out of play. so why fight the inquiry like you do? if I thought like you, I would put Guiliani, Barr, Mulvaney, all of them before the Committee, and act civil. what is there to lose? Originally Posted by Chung Tran
What laws did the Bidens break? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500If they weren't corrupt in the first place, we wouldn't be having these hearings.
Their testimony is obviously relevant.