What would you do or expect if caught?

Agreed wind. Too many people on this board want to attack anyone that discusses the risks involved. Be it getting caught, unsafe practices, Whatever, there seems to be a contingent that want to aggressively silence anyone discussing realities of situations as if it's ruining their party and they'd rather not know. I for one welcome these discussions so that we can all make better choices as we hobby. When you ignore risk that's when it bites you in the ass.

Just because you're filling up his plate with steak at home doesn't mean he ain't gonna stop by Three Forks every once in a while.

Know what I'm sayin'?

(Written in Rodney Dangerfield voice)

Here's a thought. Since you're bent on ruining your (ex) husbands life, tell us who it is. You shouldn't care. This will add validity to your story and let us see his reviews over the years. I'm guessing since this is a bunch of made up bullshit that we'll hear nothing......... Originally Posted by FGarvin

Is she bent on ruining it? I'm not sure. I think she will if he fights. She stated that she was given an STD by her husband. She also seems to know who he has seen which could come from reviews but she seems to have inferred that she knows more than what would be in a review right? So naming her husband immediately links the girls he reviewed to having possibly been exposed to an STD. Do we want to know that? Do the girls he has seen want that? Read all of her posts and comments she directed to providers that posted and she seems to have displayed a bit of a problem with two specific ladies. Maybe a few of the ladies should weigh in on your comment. They would actually have to most to lose.

What would be the reasoning for it to be made-up bullshit? She has vented a little and really not caused any drama. A lot of others here in the thread seem to be looking for it.

Maybe I just read things differently but what I get out of these posts is not all that farfetched. A wife contracted an STD and while trying to comprehend how she could have done so discovered her husband was a member here that sees providers via accessing his phone. So we know he is a fucking careless idiot. She gained access to passwords for emails and has texts and has learned that he has seen more than one provider and claims to know the locations of incall/outcalls as well as their IRL identities (suggested more than one would be subpoenaed).

Initially I would guess she loaded some sort of spyware to his phone and possibly followed him but that still requires a lot of time invested in figuring out who the ladies are. Maybe she employed a Private Detective. If she truly is a faithful wife then all of your suggestions that simply having a presence here will hardly impact her or the decisions regarding her children. The guy is married with children and spending money on providers. That will definitely have a negative impact on him. Her joining a board like this and asking questions is kind of what one would expect if they knew their spouse was here. It sounds like she has the dude cold and controls the outcome if his professional and personal reputation can not stand up to the scrutiny a public divorce involving prostitutes would bring.

Do any of you know how these things go down at first? She files for divorce and requests an emergency hearing for temporary custody orders and his actions land him with supervised visitation on 1st, 3rd and 5th weekends from the start and lays the proof of showing he's a good and deserving father on him. Presenting that proof is timely and expensive.

Lots of talk here about how she might be damaging the kids by raising the issue. Can't you say the same about him if caught dead to rights he tries to fight it all? He can choose to roll over pay for his sins right? He does not need to subject his children to a fight or trying to tarnish their image of their mother. Texas is a no fault divorce state so if she wants out it is happening. The only thing to fight about is assets, support and custody. If he has been spending communal monies on providers he could see a very uneven split and loose a lot more than he thinks. Assuming her presentation is accurate he will spend an awful lot of money fighting an uphill battle and probably pay the costs of her fight as well.

Is she bent on ruining it? I'm not sure. I think she will if he fights. She stated that she was given an STD by her husband. She also seems to know who he has seen which could come from reviews but she seems to have inferred that she knows more than what would be in a review right? So naming her husband immediately links the girls he reviewed to having possibly been exposed to an STD. Do we want to know that? Do the girls he has seen want that? Read all of her posts and comments she directed to providers that posted and she seems to have displayed a bit of a problem with two specific ladies. Maybe a few of the ladies should weigh in on your comment. They would actually have to most to lose.

What would be the reasoning for it to be made-up bullshit? She has vented a little and really not caused any drama. A lot of others here in the thread seem to be looking for it.

Maybe I just read things differently but what I get out of these posts is not all that farfetched. A wife contracted an STD and while trying to comprehend how she could have done so discovered her husband was a member here that sees providers via accessing his phone. So we know he is a fucking careless idiot. She gained access to passwords for emails and has texts and has learned that he has seen more than one provider and claims to know the locations of incall/outcalls as well as their IRL identities (suggested more than one would be subpoenaed).

Initially I would guess she loaded some sort of spyware to his phone and possibly followed him but that still requires a lot of time invested in figuring out who the ladies are. Maybe she employed a Private Detective. If she truly is a faithful wife then all of your suggestions that simply having a presence here will hardly impact her or the decisions regarding her children. The guy is married with children and spending money on providers. That will definitely have a negative impact on him. Her joining a board like this and asking questions is kind of what one would expect if they knew their spouse was here. It sounds like she has the dude cold and controls the outcome if his professional and personal reputation can not stand up to the scrutiny a public divorce involving prostitutes would bring.

Do any of you know how these things go down at first? She files for divorce and requests an emergency hearing for temporary custody orders and his actions land him with supervised visitation on 1st, 3rd and 5th weekends from the start and lays the proof of showing he's a good and deserving father on him. Presenting that proof is timely and expensive.

Lots of talk here about how she might be damaging the kids by raising the issue. Can't you say the same about him if caught dead to rights he tries to fight it all? He can choose to roll over pay for his sins right? He does not need to subject his children to a fight or trying to tarnish their image of their mother. Texas is a no fault divorce state so if she wants out it is happening. The only thing to fight about is assets, support and custody. If he has been spending communal monies on providers he could see a very uneven split and loose a lot more than he thinks. Assuming her presentation is accurate he will spend an awful lot of money fighting an uphill battle and probably pay the costs of her fight as well. Originally Posted by Cat in the Hat

It's the OP...I officially declare Shenanigans!

If this was a wife she would have already said his name handle or both. This is fake.. Come on boys and girls, a wife that has kids with him that was the only guy she's been with, 20-30 years wasted, she's not gonna get mad and divorced, she's gonna be upset, depressed, she'd want to name him so it was out there and she'd try to work it out... Smarten up!!!

Ok so RW meets hobby.

When I first started hobbying, I was separated, wife was living in another state. I was new, nieve, amazed, and pussy struck. So I was careless. Soon to be ex hacks into my email and watches my activities for a week or so. P-411' and ASPD. One night my phone blows up ringing as a provider I was seeing calls me and says I need to get on line and see what is going on, your ex is being crazy. She did not get on my account but did have emails from the providers I was seeing or wanted to see. Plus got onto my personal website and was saying I was having pristituets over at our (my) house. That I was asking discusting things like let's have Greek, that means he wants to fuck them in the ass and so on.
P-411 shut down, ASPD shut down, ladies emailing me all freaked out as the ex is emailing them. Being we were already in the divorce stage my lawyer issued a stop order to her lowyer and shut down my email accounts and website accounts.
Bitter words back and forth from her to layer, going to ruin me and my girls.
Assurances maid to p-411 and ASPD so accounts opened back up and new passwords. CK was very understanding so was the lady that runs P-411.

A short rest from hobbying (but still saw one regular lady at hotel for my weekly fun). The ladies all wanted nothing to do with me, but soon they warmed up and became my ATFs for years to come.

This is what happens when the shit hits the fan, in the RW. It gets ugly, real shit happens, but it is not always the end and it all depends on how you deal with it. So what if she told everyone I see pristituets, I don't care what they think, I'm proud to be a monger, and here I am 8 or so years later having, and had the time of my life.

IB

From your post what strikes me most is that I don't think it's a 'she' at all.

A 'she' would have already outted him. More ammo for her lawyer and why would 'she' care if 'she' was summarily banned from the boards forever.

just sayin. This post made for interesting reading...but I think was based off a bored 'he'

Your absolutely correct that a woman catching her husband cheating on sites like this isnt far fetched at all. I bet it happens all the time. no hobby phone, or she finds hobby phone, or she checks his history, or hell logs directly in because htis site caches your username and password if you say yes. Whats completely far fetched is her participating on the boards so....reasonably. Pissed off women dont do that. Internet Trolls do.

besides if her lawyer saw the terms and conditions 'she' accepted when 'she' went through the trouble of creating an account here and went.. straight to coed to post so navigated the site pretty darned well for a pissed off wife.... her lawyer would not be happy with her... at all.

There's a 'he' having a great deal of fun with this. I'll bet a dollar

-B33

Is she bent on ruining it? I'm not sure. I think she will if he fights. She stated that she was given an STD by her husband. She also seems to know who he has seen which could come from reviews but she seems to have inferred that she knows more than what would be in a review right? So naming her husband immediately links the girls he reviewed to having possibly been exposed to an STD. Do we want to know that? Do the girls he has seen want that? Read all of her posts and comments she directed to providers that posted and she seems to have displayed a bit of a problem with two specific ladies. Maybe a few of the ladies should weigh in on your comment. They would actually have to most to lose.

What would be the reasoning for it to be made-up bullshit? She has vented a little and really not caused any drama. A lot of others here in the thread seem to be looking for it.

Maybe I just read things differently but what I get out of these posts is not all that farfetched. A wife contracted an STD and while trying to comprehend how she could have done so discovered her husband was a member here that sees providers via accessing his phone. So we know he is a fucking careless idiot. She gained access to passwords for emails and has texts and has learned that he has seen more than one provider and claims to know the locations of incall/outcalls as well as their IRL identities (suggested more than one would be subpoenaed).

Initially I would guess she loaded some sort of spyware to his phone and possibly followed him but that still requires a lot of time invested in figuring out who the ladies are. Maybe she employed a Private Detective. If she truly is a faithful wife then all of your suggestions that simply having a presence here will hardly impact her or the decisions regarding her children. The guy is married with children and spending money on providers. That will definitely have a negative impact on him. Her joining a board like this and asking questions is kind of what one would expect if they knew their spouse was here. It sounds like she has the dude cold and controls the outcome if his professional and personal reputation can not stand up to the scrutiny a public divorce involving prostitutes would bring.

Do any of you know how these things go down at first? She files for divorce and requests an emergency hearing for temporary custody orders and his actions land him with supervised visitation on 1st, 3rd and 5th weekends from the start and lays the proof of showing he's a good and deserving father on him. Presenting that proof is timely and expensive.

Lots of talk here about how she might be damaging the kids by raising the issue. Can't you say the same about him if caught dead to rights he tries to fight it all? He can choose to roll over pay for his sins right? He does not need to subject his children to a fight or trying to tarnish their image of their mother. Texas is a no fault divorce state so if she wants out it is happening. The only thing to fight about is assets, support and custody. If he has been spending communal monies on providers he could see a very uneven split and loose a lot more than he thinks. Assuming her presentation is accurate he will spend an awful lot of money fighting an uphill battle and probably pay the costs of her fight as well. Originally Posted by Cat in the Hat

From your post what strikes me most is that I don't think it's a 'she' at all.

A 'she' would have already outted him. More ammo for her lawyer and why would 'she' care if 'she' was summarily banned from the boards forever.

just sayin. This post made for interesting reading...but I think was based off a bored 'he'

Your absolutely correct that a woman catching her husband cheating on sites like this isnt far fetched at all. I bet it happens all the time. no hobby phone, or she finds hobby phone, or she checks his history, or hell logs directly in because htis site caches your username and password if you say yes. Whats completely far fetched is her participating on the boards so....reasonably. Pissed off women dont do that. Internet Trolls do.

besides if her lawyer saw the terms and conditions 'she' accepted when 'she' went through the trouble of creating an account here and went.. straight to coed to post so navigated the site pretty darned well for a pissed off wife.... her lawyer would not be happy with her... at all.

There's a 'he' having a great deal of fun with this. I'll bet a dollar

-B33 Originally Posted by budman33

I called this out as fake first day back from my summer vacation.

Read the posts. Watch the single sentence style. Watch the calculated statements geared to provoke response. Look for the key words that are like fingerprints at a crime scene.

Come on folks...its not difficult to figure it out.

Is she bent on ruining it? I'm not sure. I think she will if he fights. She stated that she was given an STD by her husband. She also seems to know who he has seen which could come from reviews but she seems to have inferred that she knows more than what would be in a review right? So naming her husband immediately links the girls he reviewed to having possibly been exposed to an STD. Do we want to know that? Do the girls he has seen want that? Read all of her posts and comments she directed to providers that posted and she seems to have displayed a bit of a problem with two specific ladies. Maybe a few of the ladies should weigh in on your comment. They would actually have to most to lose.

What would be the reasoning for it to be made-up bullshit? She has vented a little and really not caused any drama. A lot of others here in the thread seem to be looking for it.

Maybe I just read things differently but what I get out of these posts is not all that farfetched. A wife contracted an STD and while trying to comprehend how she could have done so discovered her husband was a member here that sees providers via accessing his phone. So we know he is a fucking careless idiot. She gained access to passwords for emails and has texts and has learned that he has seen more than one provider and claims to know the locations of incall/outcalls as well as their IRL identities (suggested more than one would be subpoenaed).

Initially I would guess she loaded some sort of spyware to his phone and possibly followed him but that still requires a lot of time invested in figuring out who the ladies are. Maybe she employed a Private Detective. If she truly is a faithful wife then all of your suggestions that simply having a presence here will hardly impact her or the decisions regarding her children. The guy is married with children and spending money on providers. That will definitely have a negative impact on him. Her joining a board like this and asking questions is kind of what one would expect if they knew their spouse was here. It sounds like she has the dude cold and controls the outcome if his professional and personal reputation can not stand up to the scrutiny a public divorce involving prostitutes would bring.

Do any of you know how these things go down at first? She files for divorce and requests an emergency hearing for temporary custody orders and his actions land him with supervised visitation on 1st, 3rd and 5th weekends from the start and lays the proof of showing he's a good and deserving father on him. Presenting that proof is timely and expensive.

Lots of talk here about how she might be damaging the kids by raising the issue. Can't you say the same about him if caught dead to rights he tries to fight it all? He can choose to roll over pay for his sins right? He does not need to subject his children to a fight or trying to tarnish their image of their mother. Texas is a no fault divorce state so if she wants out it is happening. The only thing to fight about is assets, support and custody. If he has been spending communal monies on providers he could see a very uneven split and loose a lot more than he thinks. Assuming her presentation is accurate he will spend an awful lot of money fighting an uphill battle and probably pay the costs of her fight as well. Originally Posted by Cat in the Hat

One of the reasons I would never even attempt to create a second active handle is the fact that I know there's just no disguising one's writing style. I would stick out like a sore thumb. You might want to consider that in the future.

Thanks for the knowledgeable insight. With only one unverifiable review of a late night stripper in Houston and 3 posts we're pretty damn lucky that you just so happened to drop by now that the OP has no real basis for returning. It took a couple of days longer than I expected.

It's the OP...I officially declare Shenanigans! Originally Posted by Usual suspects

+1

Cat in Hat appears to be the OP. Same style, verbiage, etc..... Very clever post, very insightful post, very NERVE WRACKING post...... Sparked some good discussions. But I too think that The Cat is out of the bag here.........

-Nilla (Not a "ClaireMandle"....and I got witnesses! Really good witnesses!)

I think most knew it was a troll from the beginning but why not make some good from a bad, good discussion regardless.

IB

+1

Cat in Hat appears to be the OP. Same style, verbiage, etc..... Very clever post, very insightful post, very NERVE WRACKING post...... Sparked some good discussions. But I too think that The Cat is out of the bag here.........

-Nilla (Not a "ClaireMandle"....and I got witnesses! Really good witnesses!) Originally Posted by PlainVanillaATX

Fake profiles debating fake profiles...all from the same source. Basically nothing more than arguing with himself.

True addiction & inability to step away from the table at ANY time for any reason.

Its sad, but fun to watch like a trainwreck...

Fake profiles debating fake profiles...all from the same source. Basically nothing more than arguing with himself.

True addiction & inability to step away from the table at ANY time for any reason.

Its sad, but fun to watch like a trainwreck... Originally Posted by Toyz

While that would certainly explain a few things it would also mean that either he saw CSB bcd or that the two of them are in cahoots with a fake glowing review.

I have a hard time imagining either based upon their board interaction.

Around here anything's possible I suppose.

Seems obvious!

Seems obvious! Originally Posted by Deznuttz

LMAO!

"Too much time on my hands"....Styx