yeah, deriding their bike helmets ....correct? Originally Posted by JCM800CBJ7 is deriding the "Riot Cops" by deriding their equipment -- or lack of equipment -- in general: "foot wear", "shin guards", "pants", "face masks", etc., JCM800.
... riot cops ... bullshit Originally Posted by CJ7
bull shit Originally Posted by i'va biggenIf there's anyone that doesn't realize Ekim the Inbred Chimp is quoting CBJ7, it's Ekim the Inbred Chimp.
idiots ... Nyer got it. PERIOD. Originally Posted by CJ7Your brain probably couldn't comprehend that, so you just ignored it and kep pretending that CJ7 was admitting you were right. Keep dreaming.
CBJ7 is deriding the "Riot Cops" by deriding their equipment -- or lack of equipment -- in general: "foot wear", "shin guards", "pants", "face masks", etc., JCM800.
If there's anyone that doesn't realize Ekim the Inbred Chimp is quoting CBJ7, it's Ekim the Inbred Chimp. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You didn't accept the Webster definition of "weapon" I posted. And now you cite them. Which is it bitch? Are they credible or not?
Check your Websters, you dumb-fuck golem jackass, the word "pustulent" doesn't exist. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You're being totally disingenuous, because you'd find that answer if you bothered to thoroughly read the thread. Note and read MasterDickMuncher's post at #3 and follow the link he cites. Unlike you, MasterDickMuncher understood exactly what was going on when CBJ7 started this thread. It's fascinating that you would claim that you're too stupid to understand. Originally Posted by I B HankeringWhat's fascinating is that you misinterpreted almost every possible aspect of CJ7s thread and my posts.
and bike helmets ....correct? Originally Posted by JCM800It's like CBJ7 posted, the thread is about:
... riot cops ... bullshitit's about "Riot Police", JCM800. Read the title, if you have any doubts, JCM800!
Originally Posted by CJ7
The only personn with reading comprehension on this board is YOU.It's like CBJ7 posted, the thread is about:
Your syphilis-addled brain cannot comprehend any viewpoint that disagrees with you. When proven wrong, you change the subject or broaden it to include things that weren't even being discussed. Then you lie that you weren't hijacking.
CJ7 admitted nothing. Read his post No. 103 right below:
Your brain probably couldn't comprehend that, so you just ignored it and kep pretending that CJ7 was admitting you were right. Keep dreaming.
And keep up the OCD arguing, tranny fucker. Originally Posted by ExNYer
... riot cops ... bullshitit's about "Riot Police", you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Read the thread's title, if you have any doubts, lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass!
Originally Posted by CJ7
You are late to the huddle and taking out of context and trying I repeat trying to be clever. Sorry In Bred you placed second again. Originally Posted by i'va biggenYou need never worry your devolving pro-simian mind, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. No one is even close to taking your place as the number one idiot in this forum, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.
check your Webster's, IBIdiot!Well, it's obvious you don't use a dictionary, you dumb-fuck golem jackass, and all of the pictures you posted in regards to those other activities came from YOUR personal collection.
I don't read the dictionary when I take a shit. You, on the other hand.. . On both hands... On the floor.... On the dinner table.... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
You didn't accept the Webster definition of "weapon" I posted. And now you cite them. Which is it bitch? Are they credible or not?Quit equivocating, MasterDickMuncher, you never produced a picture showing a 90 something year old WWII brandishing a pen or pencil as a weapon. Meanwhile, the police very definitely were brandishing weapons: batons (BTW, those expandable batons ARE illegal weapons in Washington DC § 22-4514 ). Despite CBJ7's ridicule, those Washington DC Metropolitan police officers that were present were equipped for riot control, MasterDickMuncher, and despite your ignorant assertions, those Metropolitan officers were trained for riot control. And it's your ignorant ass that "mischaracterizes" CBJ7 posts -- because CBJ7 obviously ridicules more than the officers' "helmets" in this thread, and as you pointed out, read the thread's title. Further, nothing you jackasses can say or have said repudiates the fact that intimidating force was employed against 80 something to 90 something year old WWII veterans to keep them out of a sidewalk memorial that before Odumbo's petty actions closing it and fencing it off was open 24/7 365 with minimum security requirements. So take your "nit-picking" hypothetically dangerous pencil and pen weapons and shove them up your ignorant, lib-retarded ass, MasterDickMuncher.
What's fascinating is that you misinterpreted almost every possible aspect of CJ7s thread and my posts.
But you can't leave it at amusing us. No, not you.
You presume to speak for me when you can barely speak for yourself.
You were right when you said I understood what was going on with this thread.
The thread name? Riot police. By pointing out the bicycle helmets, he wasn't making fun of the officers. He was making fun of the fact that some people considered them riot police. Are Bobbies in London "riot police"? They carry a stick (or what ever the fuck you want to call it) and wear a funny helmet.
Do you understand? There is no deeper meaning.
Everything you have tried to hang on this thread is wrong.
He is making fun of the people who claim those are riot police. That's why he used the same/similar photo from that banned cocksucker's thread.
It's probably unfair that he was mocking a moron. I have no problem with that.
Now for the mysterious link to my previous post #20. There was one single reason why I did it. I'm going to tell you now. After I tell you, any other explanation is wrong. Completely wrong. Since I wrote it, I will be giving you fact. You have opinion at best.
Do you understand all that? I know you don't but here we go anyway.
That post contains the description of the shown group of officers and relates their duties. It says nothing about riot duty. It also says unarmed but you point out that a baton is a weapon in post #2.
In post #3 that cites post #20, I point out that by definition, almost any object can be a weapon. I'm pointing out you are splitting hairs. You then get pissed because I'm better at splitting hairs than you are. You start throwing illegal weapons noise and start quoting states law.
Then I bitch slap you with the fact that they are not in a state. They are in the District of Columbia so your state law BS means nothing.
Like I said, I'm better at this than you. You want to go nit picking? I guarantee you have 10 times the nits anyone else on this board has (except that kayla bitch).
So the object, in my opinion, is that CJ7 was mocking the banned one.
I was pointing to a definition of the majority of the officers on the scene by referencing post #20.
Post #3 trivializes you, your weapon, your presumption of fact and most of all, your "thought" process. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
dipshit. Originally Posted by Yssup RiderEvidently, that's your boyfriend's favorite "pet name" for your puny prick, you dumb-fuck golem jackass, because you use it over and over and over again.
Now you're talking about my JUNK! Go figure. Squeezdick!
Well, it's obvious you don't use a dictionary, you dumb-fuck golem jackass, and all of the pictures you posted in regards to those other activities came from YOUR personal collection.
Evidently, that's your boyfriend's favorite "pet name" for your puny prick, you dumb-fuck golem jackass, because you use it over and over and over again. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Now you're talking about my JUNK! Go figure. Squeezdick!The hyena matriarch, Yssup Hater goes down...but not on a chicken neck this time, with a broke neck...LOL
BTW -- why did you erase the link to the dictionary definition of pustulent?
Let me refresh your memory: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pustulent
You just can't help it. You think anybody doesn't think you're a liar? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
It's like CBJ7 posted, the thread is about:Wow. You are actually ignoring what he posted in the OP and are relying on a two word title to try to win an argument.
it's about "Riot Police", JCM800. Read the title, if you have any doubts, JCM800!
It's like CBJ7 posted, the thread is about:
it's about "Riot Police", you lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Read the thread's title, if you have any doubts, lying, racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass! Originally Posted by I B Hankering
