Stimulus checks. Are they good for the hobby or bad?

Willie,

The answer you seek about the media is simple.......money.

If they were not making money (either side of the spectrum), they would not report or not report the way they do.

Clickbait, and the American public is stupid enough to keep falling for it.

elg........ Originally Posted by elghund

But elg CNN's ratings are in the toilet.

They get cornholed by Fox, night after night.

They weren't even getting ratings when they were holding those town hall informercials for the moronic democrat party primary candidates a couple of months ago.

How do we reconcile this with all of this being about money? Obviously news opinion shows are going to generate money, people are addicted to them, but not many people are subjecting themselves to being indoctrinated by the imbeciles at CNN.

Is it that they've moved over to MSNBC for their nightly dose of anti-Trump propaganda programming?

Maybe they're just watching movies or television commercials, listening to celebrities vent their spleens, or staring at twitter.


Z2020

Willie,

The answer you seek about the media is simple.......money.

If they were not making money (either side of the spectrum), they would not report or not report the way they do.

Clickbait, and the American public is stupid enough to keep falling for it.

elg........ Originally Posted by elghund

NBT has a good point. Tucker Carlson has had almost all of his sponsers back out because he calls out both sides. Sponsers equal dollars and Fox hasn't shitcanned him. Why not, if it's only money? He's the only show I watch on Fox.
I think there's more to it than money, but why it happens isn't as important as what it's doing. They're reporting flat out lies, and people buy into it. It's dangerous.

You should watch The Five.

Greg Gutfeld and Jesse Watters are very funny and Dana Perino keeps things relatively reasonable.

I miss Kat Timpf, she's very good at making trouble.


Z2020

You should watch The Five.

Greg Gutfeld and Jesse Watters are very funny and Dana Perino keeps things relatively reasonable.

I miss Kat Timpf, she's very good at making trouble.


Z2020 Originally Posted by Next Best Thing

I used to watch that. I like Gutfeld. I stopped around the time they put Donna Brazille in there. I don't like Juan Williams, but she's unwatchable.

I used to watch that. I stopped around the time they put Donna Brazille in there. I don't like Juan Williams, but she's unwatchable. Originally Posted by Willie Wanker

I have no idea why FOX would hire her after the numerous stunts she pulled during the 2016 campaign, not the least of which was her revealing specific CNN debate questions to Hillary Clitoris at a time when Brazile worked for CNN.

Any normal person would consider this unbelievably unethical.

She's clearly a democrat party operative. If I worked at FOX I would be walking on eggshells any time she was in the same zip code.

She's not on the show very often though.


Z2020

I have no idea why FOX would hire her after the numerous stunts she pulled during the 2016 campaign, not the least of which was her revealing specific CNN debate questions to Hillary Clitoris when Brazile worked for CNN.

Any normal person would consider this unbelievably unethical.

She's clearly a democrat party operative. If I worked at FOX I would be walking on eggshells any time she were in the same zip code.

She's not on the show very often though.


Z2020 Originally Posted by Next Best Thing

Didn't she replace Williams on The Five?

Didn't she replace Williams on The Five? Originally Posted by Willie Wanker

No. She's on occasionally.

The only real regulars are Perino, Gutfeld, and Watters.

They always have one moronic democrat stooge on there to debase him or herself.

The difference between this and the CNN/MSNBC technique is that the FOX opinion personalities are invariably less vicious. Gutfeld and Watters do tag team Williams very well however, this is true.


Z2020

Willie this totally unrelated but you should watch the first 20 minutes of this video posted by a youtube dweeb:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRW2zvhneao

It's Judicial Watch material.

I think you'll enjoy it. It's the type of thing that Z would not take kindly to, but there's really no reason for him to click on the link.

There's also some Tara Reade information towards the end.


Z2020

Willie this totally unrelated but you should watch the first 20 minutes of this video posted by a youtube dweeb:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRW2zvhneao

It's Judicial Watch material.

I think you'll enjoy it. It's the type of thing that Z would not take kindly to, but there's really no reason for him to click on the link.

There's also some Tara Reade information towards the end.


Z2020 Originally Posted by Next Best Thing

Love Judicial Watch and Project Veritas. They provide am invaluable service. I donate to both couple of times a year

Willie this totally unrelated but you should watch the first 20 minutes of this video posted by a youtube dweeb:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRW2zvhneao

It's Judicial Watch material.

I think you'll enjoy it. It's the type of thing that Z would not take kindly to, but there's really no reason for him to click on the link.

There's also some Tara Reade information towards the end.


Z2020 Originally Posted by Next Best Thing

Dan Crenshaw had a good showing on Bill Maher,did you see it?

That's a great post right there Willie. Gave it a like.

Duke lacrosse.

Nicholas Sandman.

Donald Trump.


Z2020 Originally Posted by Next Best Thing

Thanks. I didn't even know we had that option. It doesn't show up on the mobile version.

I saw Crenshaw tune Maher up.

It's difficult for these snarky late night talk show hosts to make any hay without a howling audience of democrat party plants in the audience to agree with everything the anti-Trump host says.


Z2020

I saw Crenshaw tune Maher up.

It's difficult for these snarky late night talk show hosts to make any hay without a howling audience of democrat party plants in the audience to agree with everything the anti-Trump host says.


Z2020 Originally Posted by Next Best Thing

Maher looked uncomfortable too. No clapping seals to make.believe he's making good points.
Although, I will say this about Maher. He does call out some of the bullshit on the left. If it wasn't for his extreme TDS, I would watch his show more often. I can respect classic liberal's, theyre getting harder to find in a sea of radical progressives.

Distract and deflect, oldest trick in the book.
How about an answer? Originally Posted by Willie Wanker

An old trick used by Degenerate don, FAUX fake news, Cons and trumptards forever!!!
Wedge Issues are what they are called, intended to foment fear and incite hate amongst the feeble minded they appeal to.

Sorry to burst your delusional bubble but putting a M or F on a shitter door won't stop that type behavior. Maybe you should look into creating a uniformed 'Potty Patrol', with bold PP Armbands and PP Helmets on patrol everywhere, to apprehend these creatures!!! Your bible thumping base will positively go into raptures over it!

I think I may have already asked Z about the sexual assault allegations against Biden, not sure if he answered or not.

Z2020 Originally Posted by Next Best Thing

LOL you Cons love your Tin Foil caps, don't ya....LOL
As Stalin has trained Degenerate Don and his flock of sheep WELL, "If you repeat a lie a million times, the sheep will think it a fact!" Oh this works well for FAUX fake news too!!!



Details of Reade's account have been inconsistent, and her story has changed over time. In spring 2019, she came forward with an account of Biden touching her shoulder and neck in a way that made her feel uncomfortable, but she never mentioned sexual assault. Then in late March of this year, she went on a left-leaning podcast, The Katie Halper Show, and gave a graphic account of sexual assault similar to what she has told NPR. The story took off on left-wing and right-wing corners of the Internet.

Some supporters of the former vice president, suggest Reade has a political motive. They have tried to discredit her by pointing to her changing story, as well as her outspoken support for Bernie Sanders, who was Biden's final presidential primary challenger. Reade also had demonstrated support for candidates Elizabeth Warren and Marianne Williamson, both of whom had earlier dropped out of the race.

Other critics have pointed to her effusive online posts praising the Russian leader Vladimir Putin; Reade says she was enamored with Russia while writing a novel and has publicly walked back those statements. And yet others have questioned why, as recently as 2017, she had taken to the Internet to praise Biden.