Wow. I will simplify further. I was not referring to ivan.
I suspect the moral equivalence of your second staement makes sense when viewed through the filter of partiality. Your bias will apparently not let you see the ignorance of that position.
I was certain that my statements about the silent majority were stated as my opinion. So certain, that I didn't bother to re-read it because I knew that was what I meant. I was rushing to put down my thoughts before leaving my computer and erred in my haste. You are correct that it appeared I was attempting to speak 'for them' rather than simply imply its existence. That was not my intention.
I suggest your closing statement lacks evidence as well...ijs
Originally Posted by tracer
First..... Thank you for the condesension on that first statement........ I just assumed since you quoted a comment in which I was talking about ivan and his thread you were lumping him into my "pal"...... Since it was just a global swipe at me specifically and not my post, I get it now.....
My point of the second statement was to ask you if your "wrong" is really all that much better than their "wrong" because they are asses..... My contention is you are both wrong. Whether one is "more" in the wrong or not makes no difference. It makes you the same "type" of person you deplore when you do just as they do.
I understand what you meant.... But seeing as how my words were held to their letter, I figured I would offer up the same..... My statement was a bit tounge-in-cheek as well...... My intention was to add a little bit of smart-assidness.... My sarcasim font failed me there..... My apologies....
Not sure if you're saying I'm not the smartest tool in the shed, or I'm not the dullest..... Seems you're on the latter side of that..... Can't say I can argue with that at times...... I may not be so smarts..... But at least I'm ugly.......
JaD