Times are Hard

You post what you want , when ya want. I can either respond, ignore , cry or leave. You have no control over how I respond. I had no control over how Lauren responded. I do not have that kind of power. Originally Posted by WTF

Dealing with people like Marshall is gutter posting I will admit. The problem as I see it is folks like you. Folks who stand by silently as he steps over the line time and time again. As long as your side continues to sit on your hands when he posts over the top crap ( by that, I mean bringing a young lady's profession into the conversation)....you will continue to see me post with the respect you deserve. Which is in fact none. Originally Posted by WTF

the contradictory and illogical posts are replete

you arent responsible but i am

you spew so much much you lose track

Marshall, I have not recruited people against you, I didn't say you were successfulthough I do think that would be the easiest job in the world.

I may start a drive to have everyone put you on ignore. That is hardly the actions of one scared of you. but it is....HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

To your other point, if you think it running roughshod over people that continue to post lies (such as tax cuts always produce more income to the government) and the key word is continue because I have tried to be nice the first couple of hundred times, then yes I will have to agree with you in that regard. Originally Posted by WDF

I can yank your chain anytime I want!.......you and Doofus are my puppets.....I make you dance whenever I want.....DANCE PUPPET, DANCE!!!!!!!!


HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

the contradictory and illogical posts are replete

you arent responsible but i am

you spew so much much you lose track Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

Yes I am responsible for my posts.

Nothing contradictory there.

I take responsibility for how I respond to you or anyone else.

What is so hard to understand about that?

I never denied posting more harshly, I also explained why.

You can either like it or not. Respond or not. I have no control over you. I have no control over Marshall. I want none. All I want is the choice to either respond in kind, ignore or leave if I choose.

If you feel like a civil discussion I will engage you today, if you want some gotcha type discourse then engage Marshall.

Yes I am responsible for my posts.

Nothing contradictory there.

I take responsibility for how I respond to you or anyone else.

What is so hard to understand about that?

I never denied posting more harshly, I also explained why.

You can either like it or not. Respond or not. I have no control over you. I have no control over Marshall. I want none. All I want is the choice to either respond in kind, ignore or leave if I choose.
Originally Posted by WTF

the point is..you make me responsible for Marshall...and yet you claim responsibilty for only what you post you dumb ass

since i have ever known you your worst trait is always responding to something other than the point

the point is..you make me responsible for Marhall...and you claim responsibilty for only what you post you dumb ass

since i have ever known you your worst trait is always responding to something other than the point Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

Let us review.

1) You post saying that I have been meaner.

2) I respond with what I think may be the reason why.

3) You then respond that you were not going to respond but decided to....You say that you do not follow others post.

4) I respond that it rather unfair to follow my posts in a thread without context.

5) You then, follow and retrieve more of my posts (out of context)

6) I respond to you out of context post by stating that in fact I am responsible for my posts. My post that include good men should not sit on the sidelines to the Marshall's of the world.

7) You respond that I make you responsible for Marshall

8) Now we are at this response, responding to your number 7 response you. Which is, you are responding to me in the exact same manner that you first post to me in this thread chastised me as acting. Have we come full circle? I ask again, Is Marshall winning?


I ask you to be respobsible for your own posts. I am responsible for mine. You observed that I was much more harsh. I told you why. I did not tell you how to post to me or anyone else. I told you why I was much more harsh of late. I did not ask you to be responsible for Marshall posts. I said that if you endorse his kind of actions, I will contine to post what you seem to think are harsh comments.

You are giving me to much power.

Is Marshall winning? Originally Posted by WDF

Let us review.

1) You post saying that I have been meaner.

2) I respond with what I think may be the reason why.

3) You then respond that you were not going to respond but decided to....You say that you do not follow others post.

4) I respond that it rather unfair to follow my posts in a thread without context.

5) You then, follow and retrieve more of my posts (out of context)

6) I respond to you out of context post by stating that in fact I am responsible for my posts. My post that include good men should not sit on the sidelines to the Marshall's of the world.

7) You respond that I make you responsible for Marshall

8) Now we are at this response, responding to your number 7 response you. Which is, you are responding to me in the exact same manner that you first post to me in this thread chastised me as acting. Have we come full circle? I ask again, Is Marshall winning? Originally Posted by WTF

i give up...move along..its not worth it, the whole thing is a muddle in your mind from which you have blown hard out the snorkle you breath through and splattered me with mud, as you maintain a strong conviction you understand.

to live everyone has to maintain a modicum of dignity, i give you yours

i give up...move along..its not worth it, the whole thing is a muddle in your mind from which you have blown hard out the snorkle you breath through and splattered me with mud, as you maintain a strong conviction you understand.

to live everyone has to maintain a modicum of dignity, i give you yours Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

You give up from what?

Observing that I have been posting harsher of late.

Check out your posts to me before giving up next time.

I know more need your judgements than you need mine.

It’s liberal fish shit ; not mud.

And he doesn’t like waves in his little pool; so, let’ let him keep swimming in his small puddle of self-delusion.

I'd hate to see how much more you'd have to make than the great unwashed before you considered yourself "rich."

This sort of attitude is a huge part of the problem in the U.S. Dumb fuckers who make up to half a million a year and don't think that they're rich. If you were poor for a few months, we could cure that. You'd think half a million a year was rich then!!!

It used to be "To whom much is given, much is asked." "Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country."

Now, it's "Yeah, I know I make close to half a million a year, but by God, I can't spare a nickel for the government so they can take care of the poor, because I'm not 'rich'".

We sure have gone down the shitter in the last 50 years.




So the people you sell the business to are going to just fire all the employees and board up the place? My guess is if that's what they're going to do, they won't pay much. Or might they continue to run the business and keep the jobs??!!!!! Originally Posted by TexTushHog

I agree, but I think this is better in the hands of the Church not the Government. Let the Church be the Church and the Government balance the budget.

Fish shit is some fertile shit.

http://www.lillymiller.com/alaska.html

Very good for post apocalyptic gardening ventures. Stock up on your ten year supply now.

It’s liberal fish shit ; not mud.

And he doesn’t like waves in his little pool; so, let’ let him keep swimming in his small puddle of self delusion. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Fish shit is some fertile shit. Originally Posted by amusemeant

For vegetables and other assorted plants.

the point is..you make me responsible for Marshall...and yet you claim responsibilty for only what you post you dumb ass

since i have ever known you your worst trait is always responding to something other than the point Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

Let me explain it in simpleton terms. Sorry, I had overvalued your intelligence.
You are not responsible for Marshall. You are responsible for your actions (or inaction) in regards to Marshall.
For example were you to see a man beating a woman on the street, I propose we actually try and stop that action.
You seem to be saying that the assault is none of your bidness.
You are not responsible for the Marshall's behavior but you are responsible for your inaction to his inappropriate behavior. .
All I have done is point out what a total ass Marshall was for the action and what kind of man you are for staying on the sidelines while a fellow poster berates a woman's profession to try and gain advantage in a political debate.

I. B. will now try and say that I did the exact same thing to Lauren Summerhill.

That is a lie.

I only pointed out Ms Summerhill's numerous double standards. I never ever had to degrade her by bringing up her profession.

You're a hypocrite. Evidently, you've already forgoten these remarks where you criticized Lauren:

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...1&postcount=21

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...1&postcount=27

You badgered her every post until she left Eccie. These posts were just the final straw. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You have made allegation that I ran Lauren Summerhill off with remarks in these two threads. Would you care to point out the so called offending remarks that were the straw that broke the camel's back.

I would be happy to explain any misunderstanding you are having trouble with.

You can't be any slower than never.....

I voted for McCain. But I hear his wife likes the finer things in life also. So if it wasn't Michelle, it would have been Mrs. McCain. Did you know that Jacki Kennedy spent millions of dollars redecorating the white house back in the day? Originally Posted by armydude

I don't know how much the vacation cost. I do think it was ill-timed. I
also think she could have vacationed somewhere in the States since because of the economy. I also don't think that anyone buy her family should have been included in the cost. An entourage isn't needed. Regardless, I don't knock the First Lady for the vacation. I think if we are going to knock her for something, it should be a real something like her having the largest staff, by far, than any other First Lady ever. At the end of the day, she's not the president; she shouldn't get the perks of being one either.

P.S. I love the avatar.