Inquiries and Impeachment of Trump

No, I don’t. My news media never made that claim. Sounds like another lie from the cult.

Remember the guy Individual one?

He’s the guy who used Cohen in a cover up for his brief affair with a porn star who described his cock as a toad stool. Rumor is Individual one and the fat lying bastard are one in the same. Imagine that Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Trump lied about having sex with a female? Was that after he was elected? Was it in the White House where he had this alleged sex?

What a dick. The prides of the Great White South.

I don’ts know about yous, but I think HedRot might be a little bit retardeds in real life, eh? Maybe he’s one of thoses that your government is not providing adequates social services for.

Sad. Originally Posted by HoeHummer

exactly right..

exactly right.. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

You are aligning yourself with HoesHummer? You've hit bottom!

You are aligning yourself with HoesHummer? You've hit bottom! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Yous prefer to hits HedRot’s bottom, you fairy!

LOLLING

Between wtf chung tranny and hh/assup..

I wonder who would be in the middle?

My money is on chung tranny!

For a change, yous are wrong, stolen valor.

Your mum would be the corrects answer

You are aligning yourself with HoesHummer? You've hit bottom! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Between wtf chung tranny and hh/assup..

I wonder who would be in the middle?

My money is on chung tranny! Originally Posted by winn dixie

I'll have to be more selective in the word choice department and avoid using such inciteful words like "bottom" ... I had no idea that it would get HoseHummer all in a giddy mood and he'd/she'd start dwelling on humping butt instead of Humming Hose!

Trump calls for a quick end to the impeachment process as lawmakers return to town

President Trump called for a quick end to the impeachment process Monday as congressional Republicans stepped up pressure on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to transmit articles of impeachment to the Senate, allowing a trial to begin in the chamber.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...9fb_story.html


Nancy needs to keep the pressure on the fat lying bastard, If he starts a major conflict to cover his ass so be it. No way he wins in 2020.

Bolton says he is prepared to testify in Senate trial if subpoenaed

Former national security adviser John Bolton, highly sought by Democrats as an impeachment witness, said Monday that he is prepared to testify in a Senate trial if a subpoena is issued — a move that could be damaging to President Trump.

this is the most viewed thread.

45,000+ views.

Bolton says he is prepared to testify in Senate trial if subpoenaed

— a move that could be damaging to President Trump. Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Or could be exonerating!

He "could" be the first witness called by the DimWits who has first-hand direct knowledge of the conversations by Trump and conversations with Trump .... oh, wait, ..

I forgot they had the tapes and transcripts available to them!

So disgruntled Bolton is going to dispute the tapes/transcripts?

Or could be exonerating!

He "could" be the first witness called by the DimWits who has first-hand direct knowledge of the conversations by Trump and conversations with Trump .... oh, wait, ..

I forgot they had the tapes and transcripts available to them!

So disgruntled Bolton is going to dispute the tapes/transcripts? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Let's see the two very participants in the call both agree no pressure/etc. was applied. What better testimony.

So Bolton giving any "opinion" on what he thought he heard has relevance when the primary party Zelensky of the Ukraine said no pressure.

And Still no answer
3 questions the LSM has forgot about ?
1) IF there was a Quid pro quo was that illegal ?
2) Why are all the "witnesses " (3 hand opinions) disgruntled employees or fired ?
3) Hunters dealings ?
That's the whole base of the investigation
Funny how simple question are to difficult for the Distortion of fact fairy tales
And abuse of power really talk about distortion of facts ,,,,,

Or could be exonerating!

It sure could be, so let’s hear it.

He "could" be the first witness called by the DimWits who has first-hand direct knowledge of the conversations by Trump and conversations with Trump .... oh, wait, ..

Well, he was in the room when the perfect call took place.

I forgot they had the tapes and transcripts available to them!

So disgruntled Bolton is going to dispute the tapes/transcripts? Originally Posted by LexusLover

I doubt that. He will likely fill in the parts that were deliberately omitted


...

Bolton’s willingness to testify in Trump’s impeachment trial ramps up pressure on Senate Republicans

John Bolton scrambled Senate Republicans’ impeachment strategy on Monday, declaring his willingness to testify and upping the pressure on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and his party to summon the former national security adviser as a witness in President Trump’s trial.

Bolton last fall rebuffed House impeachment investigators’ entreaties to testify about his concerns about Trump’s demands that Ukraine investigate his political rivals as the administration delayed military aid. Bolton’s surprise announcement complicated the political calculus for McConnell’s no-witness strategy and appeared to increase the likelihood of additional testimony that could embarrass the president.

“Since my testimony is once again at issue, I have had to resolve the serious competing issues as best I could, based on careful consideration and study,” Bolton said. “I have concluded that, if the Senate issues a subpoena for my testimony, I am prepared to testify.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...776_story.html