Q for the Mods: Sharing my own reviews?

ARE YOU FUCKIN' SERIOUS?

12 pages, already? So to capsulize, whatever the rule is, and however it's ultimately interpreted (or not), Wakeup wants to bend one of the Houston mods over the rail. I get it!

DeD, you may want to think about changing your avatar. He only posted that hidden desire after seeing that suggestive photo repeatedly. ijs

...and Boardman's still a pussy, and dh still has to buy lunch



Originally Posted by TexasGator

This is a bit like reading irs tax court rulings.

How the hell can you get that as the official stance from what I wrote.??????????????? Originally Posted by Pistolero

Sorry but I wasn't going by what you wrote since I didn't see this

(And now confirmed by Admins and Owners) Originally Posted by Jusanotherdude

stated anywhere in your post.

Heh! I was right!



Take that Fucktards!

You bitches are welcome........ijs

I want to thank the staff for their clarification of the guidelines and where they stand on this confusing issue. I apologize for any stress this may have caused anyone. While I do still staunchly believe there is value in accurate feedback, I understand that my desires for an open information exchange may not gel with the majority of membership here. I am more than happy to abide by any rules that the staff lay out, which is why I instituted my review policy to begin with; it seemed in line with my interpretation. It was never my intent to guide or harm the review process at all - I truly believe in the value of accurate reviews, and, for what it's worth, if an accurate "No" review were to be written about me, I would not stand in the way of its posting. It is good to have the official interpretation out there. If it is deemed that I should be removed from the board for any amount of time for acknowledging that I knew that the contents of my review (as transcribed via email from BP prior to posting on ECCIE) were accurate, I shall accept my punishment with grace. If it is deemed that I should be given another chance, I shall move forward following the strictest letter of the rules before me. I know the staff are innocent volunteers in all of this, and I value the time they've no doubt spent debating this issue, regardless of the outcome or how it might affect me.

Thank you,
Christle Fox Originally Posted by theCFE

Respect!! Very classy response!!!

14 Pages wow

Does WU make top 10 (or 9 looking for a 10nth) list of reasons to fuck Val? He kept those pics up even when his strongest allies beat him relentlessly for it. As much as I may dislike the WU persona, he is consistent. Consistently an asshole, but you always know where he stands. Do you think hooktards seek him out for his attention? Probably the opposite.

BP's list is a marketing tool for the hooktards, and he receives a benefit from it. He has gamed the system, and most of us are jealous that we didn't think of it first. Originally Posted by texasjohn1965

Those are just details. Like I said, I see absolutely no difference in either action.

Similar to your last statement:

WU's love-threADs are a marketing tool for Valerie, and he receives a benefit from them.

You bitches are welcome........ijs Originally Posted by dearhunter

But, in the previous thread, you said:

I have no interest in seeing theCFE get points over this matter. Originally Posted by dearhunter

So, bro's before ho's....or...something else?

Those are just details. Like I said, I see absolutely no difference in either action.

Similar to your last statement:

WU's love-threADs are a marketing tool for Valerie, and he receives a benefit from them.
Originally Posted by Sarunga

You really are a moron aren't you?

Show me where WU has actively recruited discount sessions with new hooktards on a regular basis?

WU and Val are cast from the same mold, so it's only natural that those two should hook up.

I am not a fan of any of the participants, but I don't let my bias blind me to what game is being played. You are comparing a pimp to a swinger, and saying they are equivalent.

you have to accept retards limitations......theCFE did not receive any points (or a ban) for what I knew to be a Rule 20 violation.....if she gets them now as part of this clarfying conversation, I will advocate that they be reversed.

Get to advocating...

you have to accept retards limitations......theCFE did not receive any points (or a ban) for what I knew to be a Rule 20 violation.....if she gets them now as part of this clarfying conversation, I will advocate that they be reversed. Originally Posted by dearhunter

She's currently banned now...

Damn.

The wheels of hooker justice turn very slowly indeed.
*Someone needs to fix this cause I want more 'Un-Gloomy' tits ASAP.*

She's currently banned now... Originally Posted by jbravo_123

She should have gotten it when it happened or at least as soon as Pistolero got the clarification as stated on page 2. I thinck the mods felt like they had to do something in order to set the example...and they probably did.
That's fine, it is what it is.
Christle handled it with class in her last post. That's a lot more than I can say about some of the rest of us fucktards. Hopefully the ban period will at least be retroactive.

I'm working on it, boss.......and I call bullshit on the ban.

Keystone modtarding is never pretty and usually does not end well........ijs.

The fact that almost everyone (and I mean almost everyone) had to back up to figure out that there was even a violation dictates that a simple warning is sufficient and appropriate on this one.