The Mueller report

You call it a "skill"? How hard is it to hit the quote button, then stick your comment in without fucking up the quote?

He needs to work on a lot of things! Originally Posted by lustylad

yeah, he wasn't careful on where he deleted somethings.


he deleted the bracket that would have retained the quote.

You call it a "skill"? How hard is it to hit the quote button, then stick your comment in without fucking up the quote?

He needs to work on a lot of things! Originally Posted by lustylad

I guess if I spent a lot more time on the site posting thousands of comments I could reach your level of expertise. Fuck that I have a life to live!

So you willingly admit to your severe case of congenital myopia.

A REAL and legitimate investigation into Russian involvement in the 2016 election would have thoroughly examined hildebeest's Russian operatives, their ties to the Kremlin and how they contributed to the origin of the Steele dossier.





FTFY Originally Posted by I B Hankering

So now you’re going to attack my eyesight 😂
Like I said , I don’t give a shit what Clinton is accused of. I choose to ignore it like you choose to ignore the facts and evidence in volume two of the Mueller report.

So now you’re going to attack my eyesight 😂
Like I said , I don’t give a shit what Clinton is accused of. I choose to ignore it like you choose to ignore the facts and evidence in volume two of the Mueller report. Originally Posted by Jaxson66

And you ignore the fact that Mueller didn’t indict Trump of anything. A prosecutors job is to indict or not. Mueller chose NOT.

So now you’re going to attack my eyesight 😂
Like I said , I don’t give a shit what Clinton is accused of. I choose to ignore it like you choose to ignore the facts and evidence in volume two of the Mueller report. Originally Posted by Jaxson66

This is the RELEVANT part of the Mueller report you so blindly refuse to see:

"[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

"... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime...”

Hence, you're just sputtering bullshit.

This is the RELEVANT part of the Mueller report you so blindly refuse to see:




Hence, you're just sputtering bullshit. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You sure that’s in the Mueller report...that looks copied and pasted from the Barr Exoneration Letter.
Did you hear a fed court ruled against the Lying Looney for release of financial records .. plus Douche Bank has some folks looking into their business practices because of the trump-Kushner accounts. But you’re still winning😂

No need to correct me on Douche 😎

But you’re still winning😂 Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Trump certainly is. No charges levied for collusion or obstruction and the Mueller report is certainly losing steam pretty much across the board as can be said by the new/renewed efforts to go after financial records/etc., which as the several bombshells(first from MadCow on Trump taxes, and the latest NYT 30 year old tax fizzle) have shown don't seem to prove anything either.

But please continue to enlighten us on your "facts" where Trump is being taken down.

You sure that’s in the Mueller report...that looks copied and pasted from the Barr Exoneration Letter.
Did you hear a fed court ruled against the Lying Looney for release of financial records .. plus Douche Bank has some folks looking into their business practices because of the trump-Kushner accounts. But you’re still winning��

No need to correct me on Douche �� Originally Posted by Jaxson66

That you're questioning the bottom-line findings of the Mueller report explains why you're having a problem comprehending the Mueller report ... that and your uncalled for braggadacio about being an expert on douching.

One option that’s been floated by House Democrats to compel Trump officials to comply with their congressional probes and subpoenas is to bundle contempt citations into a single House floor vote where, if passed, it would then give Congress the power to issue fines and jail individuals through inherent contempt. A power afforded to Congress, inherent contempt has not been used in more than 80 years.

The DOJ is in his majesty's pockes.
The begining of the end? Or the end of the beginning?

[QUOTE=I B Hankering;1061498352]That you're questioning the bottom-line findings of the Mueller report explains why you're having a problem comprehending the Mueller report ... that and your uncalled for braggadacio about being an expert on douching. [/QUOTE

I question the Barr exoneration letter where you obviously posted a fragment of the paragraph where it appears in the Mueller report. Barr used that cherry picked sentence to aide in his coverup.
BTW the House intelligence committee just released Cohen behind closed doors testimony. He claims he had 15 conversations with Jay Sekelow regarding trump tower Moscow and that he was instructed to lie to Congress. But Mango Mussolini calls Cohen a liar and a rat so I assume that’s case closed for trumpeters.

[QUOTE=Jaxson66;1061498749]

That you're questioning the bottom-line findings of the Mueller report explains why you're having a problem comprehending the Mueller report ... that and your uncalled for braggadacio about being an expert on douching. [/QUOTE

I question the Barr exoneration letter where you obviously posted a fragment of the paragraph where it appears in the Mueller report. Barr used that cherry picked sentence to aide in his coverup.
BTW the House intelligence committee just released Cohen behind closed doors testimony. He claims he had 15 conversations with Jay Sekelow regarding trump tower Moscow and that he was instructed to lie to Congress. But Mango Mussolini calls Cohen a liar and a rat so I assume that’s case closed for trumpeters. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Glad you brought that up.

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/house-demo...224502259.html

here's your dilemma. ... "When is a liar not a liar?" who knows!


BAHAHAAAAAAAAA


Cohen claims that Trump's lawyers edited his testimony. Cohen had zero problem with it then. that he has a problem with it now is because he's a liar trying to lie his way into a lessor sentence, or was at the time since he's in jail now.

there is nothing illegal about Sekulow editing the statements. nothing. unless Cohen is the stupidest lawyer ever he knows perfectly well anyone with a brain consults a lawyer prior to their testimony and they tell their client what to say and what NOT to say.

this is why in many cases even in Congressional testimony the witness has .. wait for it ... A LAWYER PRESENT THAT WHISPERS IN THEIR EAR BEFORE THEY SPEAK.

now we all know that the left is so desperate to get Trump that they overlook this fact. Even their own witnesses HAVE LAWYERS WHISPERING IN THEIR EAR.

this is why they allow counsel to be present.

"It is simply not fathomable that a Constitution that grants Congress the power to remove a President for reasons including criminal behavior would deny Congress the power to investigate him for unlawful conduct — past or present — even without formally opening an impeachment inquiry," U.S. District Court Judge Amit Mehta wrote in a lengthy opinion Monday afternoon.

I question the Barr exoneration letter where you obviously posted a fragment of the paragraph where it appears in the Mueller report. Barr used that cherry picked sentence to aide in his coverup.
BTW the House intelligence committee just released Cohen behind closed doors testimony. He claims he had 15 conversations with Jay Sekelow regarding trump tower Moscow and that he was instructed to lie to Congress. But Mango Mussolini calls Cohen a liar and a rat so I assume that’s case closed for trumpeters. Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Those lines are verbatim in the Mueller report. Aren't you aware of that fact at this late date? Or is MSNBC misinformation pablum all that sustains you these days?

Those lines are verbatim in the Mueller report. Aren't you aware of that fact at this late date? Or is MSNBC misinformation pablum all that sustains you these days?
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Below is the complete sentence which Barr cherry picked for his exoneration letter. It’s a conclusion on so called collusion not Obstruction of Justice.

Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.

Fact...Putin’s jailhouse punk committed Obstruction and his day of reckoning is coming.

Below is the complete sentence which Barr cherry picked for his exoneration letter. It’s a conclusion on so called collusion not Obstruction of Justice.

Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.

Fact...Putin’s jailhouse punk committed Obstruction and his day of reckoning is coming. Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Fact, Mueller didn’t indict Trump on Obstruction charges. Barr and Rosenstein didn’t charge Trump with Obstruction. The fact of the matter is that case is closed. There is zero legal case anymore. I suggest you badger your congressman to proceed with impeachment. That’s the only avenue for Trump haters like yourself. Proceed with caution. Pelosi is. She knows it would die in the Senate.