Who cares if she has a tattoo? If every girl who had a tramp stamp was a provider we wouldn’t have to deal with a market full of nothing but hoodrats. Unfortunately, 99% of them aren’t. Originally Posted by JacuzzmePhotos of her were part of her supposed profile on a sugar baby site (which we all know is full of prostitutes). She could easily disprove that the photo and profile are not her by showing she doesn’t have the easily identifiable tramp stamp. See that’s really simple.
It’s not her responsibility to prove it’s not her, it’s the accuser’s responsibility to prove it is. I thought you were supposed to be a lawyer who should already know this. Originally Posted by JacuzzmeYou're wasting your time, jacuzzme. 1b1 subscribes to libtard logic.
Photos of her were part of her supposed profile on a sugar baby site (which we all know is full of prostitutes). She could easily disprove that the photo and profile are not her by showing she doesn’t have the easily identifiable tramp stamp. See that’s really simple.
Or she could admit the profile and photo are hers and change her claims to - jshe honestly thought it was a dating site not a prostitution site. Y’all would still believe that because her fans are stupidiotic. Originally Posted by 1blackman1
Different photo sport. The photo that was disproved were of her in lingerie sport. Not the ones she used on her supposed sugar baby profile. Two different things.
As for the ignorance running through Lusty’s head. She has no obligation to disprove it. But if she’s gonna make these grand denials she COULD easily disprove it. Just like I can say you’re damned stupid when you type. You can easily prove my wrong by stopping doing so. Originally Posted by 1blackman1
As for the ignorance running through my head... I can say you’re damned stupid when you type. You can easily prove my wrong by stopping doing so. Originally Posted by 1blackman1Or I can say 1b1 is too chicken to jump out of a plane at 10,000 feet without a parachute. Go ahead and prove me wrong, sport.
The Daily Mail. Not OANN? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
“Almost Definitely Fake.”
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Is that why you led off with the Daily Mail?
Pretty pedestrian effort there big fella!
Hope the slunt sues that PAC. It might all be bullshit - like anyone gives a fuck - but that stupid twat will have to sit through depositions. And at the end of the day, that all we need anyway, right? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
The Daily Mail is tabloid trash. And you know it.
Nothing you say will change that. And the fact that you chose that as your lead source indicate where/how you build your arguments.
Fail! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider