Agreed Originally Posted by WombRaiderNobody gives a flying fuck what you think, sewer rat. We all know a one-word post is intellectually strenuous for you.
.
Common business practices means if they were forced to operate like a an actual business. Like most republitards, you see a reduction in spending and start screaming about national security. Why don't you ever concentrate on efficiency? Originally Posted by WombRaiderNobody asked you, sewer rat. My question was directed at COG, so go stick your repulsive jalepeno dick somewhere else. The only time you ever showed a knack for efficiency is when you tripled your cocks-sucked-per-minute rate down at the gloryholes.
So you fucked up. Originally Posted by WombRaiderNot me, sewer rat. The community organizer in the WH fucked up. Aren't you proud of his legacy? Eight years without a fucking budget. Ain't that an achievement? He'll go down in history as a fiscal maestro - Barack Hussein Continuing Resolution Obama!
He certainly will go down in history as a State Senator, a US Senator and a twice elected Presudent of the United States.
The rest continues to be sour grape bellyaching, seven years later, by a little leaguer who supports the Asian sex slave industry.
Fine American you are... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Nobody asked you, sewer rat. My question was directed at COG, so go stick your repulsive jalepeno dick somewhere else. The only time you ever showed a knack for efficiency is when you tripled your cocks-sucked-per-minute rate down at the gloryholes.You better be careful, or you might put your gay enforcer out of business . You're never more hilarious than when you're trying to be tough. Most republicans? Is that why they are constantly trying to make cuts? Oh, wait, they aren't.
Most Republicans would love to see our tax dollars spent more efficiently. Too bad sequestration required the DoD to make automatic across-the-board spending cuts, without regard to their impact on military readiness. Oh wait - whose brainchild was sequestration again? Oh yeah - it was that efficiency-maximizing community organizer in the White House!
. Originally Posted by lustylad
Yes, the NDAA originally WAS a bipartisan bill. Both sides in Congress plus the executive branch agreed on the amount of defense spending as well as the reform provisions it contained. And yet Odumbo vetoed it anyway! For reasons that have nothing to do with the bill, something no previous president has ever done. The responsibility for ANY Presidential veto resides squarely in the Oval Office. Why can't you get that through your thick blame-shifting partisan skull?
I also blame the nincompoop for not knowing how to budget. If you want more for defense, then you allocate less for non-defense. That's the real world. Instead, Odumbo says I want more for defense - therefore I am entitled to more for non-defense. That's completely upside down. It's the Alice-in-Wonderland world. No wonder the community organizer hasn't passed a single budget since taking office in 2009.
. Originally Posted by lustylad
Perhaps you need to return to Civics 101. The President doesn't pass a budget, dumbass, Congress does. The President submits a budget request, which Congress works off of. Obama has submitted a budget request each year he's been in office.
You also lie when it comes to his allocation for more defense bullshit. Saying you want more for defense and wanting more for non-defense doesn't mean the two things are mutually exclusive. Of course there will be cuts in other areas.
He vetoed it. Get over it. It's his prerogative to do so. Originally Posted by WombRaider
Not me, sewer rat. The community organizer in the WH fucked up. Aren't you proud of his legacy? Eight years without a fucking budget. Ain't that an achievement? He'll go down in history as a fiscal maestro - Barack Hussein Continuing Resolution Obama!You're a fucking loser. You aren't even man enough to admit you made a fucking mistake. Better put some lotion on that well-fucked pussy of yours...
. Originally Posted by lustylad
Too bad sequestration required the DoD to make automatic across-the-board spending cuts, without regard to their impact on military readiness. Oh wait - whose brainchild was sequestration again? Oh yeah - it was that efficiency-maximizing community organizer in the White House!If you are going to tell that story...tell the whole story about how congress rejected all other proposals and this was done because everybody thought congress would finally get off their ass and pass a budget rather tham deal with sequestration.
. Originally Posted by lustylad