"Six" of them, CBJ7 -- six which entered hostile airspace and went veritably undetected. Originally Posted by I B HankeringThe arguing is getting heavy and nasty for a change.
a c 130 vs a jumbo jet .. yeah, they're both the same if you're a total idiot, and YOU are Originally Posted by CJ7You're the ignorant ass making that argument, CBJ7. Regardless of your deflection, CBJ7, the reality is that TWELVE -- not just one -- aircraft went virtually unobserved in hostile territory.
You're the ignorant ass making that argument, CBJ7. Regardless of your deflection, CBJ7, the reality is that TWELVE -- not just one -- aircraft went virtually unobserved in hostile territory.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
To run out of answers one much have some in the first place.LL....did you have more information before the Zimmerman trial or more information on what happen to this flight?
All he has is name calling ... that's all he ever will have. Originally Posted by LexusLover
just imagining all the baggage handlers that know the difference between jumbo jet capabilities and turbo prop military aircraft capabilities laughing their asses off at all of you flight engineers on a hooker board cracks me up ... not only are you boys too stupid to understand you're all clueless, you're all too stupid to notice you're the laughing stock of anyone on this board who can even spell airplane ... but that's ok, if you all insist on being the low end of the brainwave, who am I to argue?It remains that if twelve to fourteen aircraft can remain virtually undetected in hostile airspace and territory, so it is also possible that a solitary plane can likewise go undetected, you enormous ignoramus.
please, carry on showcasing your vast knowledge about aircraft physics ........ Originally Posted by CJ7
Does your avatar qualify you? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn