This belongs on the AgedLikeMilk subreddit. Pretty impressive as it instantly curdled.
You seem to have missed two other rulings in two other districtsOriginally Posted by HDGristle
Tuesday's ruling comes after a Trump-appointed federal judge in Texas last week permanently blocked the Trump administration from detaining, transferring or removing Venezuelans targeted for deportation under the Alien Enemies Act in the Southern District of Texas -- ruling that the administration's invocation of the AEA "exceeds the scope" of the law.
"I hold that the predicates for the Presidential Proclamation that TdA has engaged in either a 'war,' 'invasion' or a 'predatory incursion' of the United States do not exist," Hellerstein's opinion said. "There is nothing in the AEA that justifies a finding that refugees migrating from Venezuela, or TdA gangsters who infiltrate the migrants, are engaged in an 'invasion' or 'predatory injunction.'"Remember that the Supreme Court didn't rule on whether the AEA was properly invoked. It found that Boasberg didn't have juridiction since the detainments weren't in DC and while it lifted the injunction it also narrowly added caveats regarding notice and process. Hence why suits were filed in TX and NY.
bahahahahaaaaaa... Agreed... "Send 'em OUT! ...
the Supreme Court has already ruled Trump has the authority ...
Supreme Court allows Trump to enforce Alien Enemies Act for rapid deportations
https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/07/polit...-flights-trump
so two leftist judges defy the Supreme Court. who do you think wins that fight?
BAHHAAAAHAAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
It's for those who are charged as gang members- they can be removed, but require ability to reply to the charges and DUe PROCESS. Nobody wants gang members here- and hopefully they are all deported who are part of the thug life. I don't have a problem with asylum seekers who otherwise want to apply to stay here and pay taxes etc. Originally Posted by eyecu2Agreed 100%
Nope, only applies to citizens of the USA. Originally Posted by IcemanWrong. Due process applies to every single person within our borders. What trump is doing is unconstitutional, by definition.
Nope, only applies to citizens of the USA. Originally Posted by IcemanThe text of those amendments, the Supreme Court and a substantial amount of case law disagree.
Wrong. Due process applies to every single person within our borders. What trump is doing is unconstitutional, by definition.
https://constitution.congress.gov/br...ALDE_00001262/ Originally Posted by tommy156
Immigration enforcement:President Trump ordered the Department of Homeland Security late on Friday to add 20,000 officers to the deportation forces of the United States, an enormous expansion of immigration enforcement if carried out. The order was tucked into a presidential proclamation that urged undocumented immigrants to leave the country voluntarily.Would have been smarter to include a massive upswing in immigration court judge hiring as well.
The Supreme Court on Friday blocked President Donald Trump from moving forward with deportations under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act for a group of immigrants in northern Texas, siding with Venezuelans who feared they were poised for imminent removal under the sweeping wartime authority.https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/16/polit...en-enemies-act
The decision is a significant loss for Trump, who wants to use the law to speed deportations – and avoid the kind of review normally required before removing people from the country. But the decision is also temporary and the underlying legal fight over the president’s invocation has continued simultaneously in multiple federal courts across the country.
The justices sent the case back to an appeals court to decide the underlying questions in the case, including whether the president’s move is legal and, if it is, how much notice the migrants targeted under the act should receive.
