FACTS my ass, you pathetic twat. All you did, turd, was post far right propaganda; the 'alternative facts."
FACTS
1. Trump associates and/or campaign officials were electronically surveilled prior to January 20, 2017.
2. This surveillance was carried out/compiled by US intelligence agencies working for the Obama administration.
3. Those US intelligence agencies sent reports summarizing the results of such eavesdropping to the Obama White House, where they were read by Susan Rice and others.
4. Such summaries were often written in a way making it easy to identify the Trump officials without unmasking them.
5. On multiple occasions, Susan Rice, John Brennan and Samantha Powers requested unmasking of the names of the Trump officials in those summaries.
6. It has been reported some of the requests for unmasking had nothing to do with Russia or ties between Russia and the Trump campaign.
7. It has also been reported that the intelligence provided to the Obama White House included information on meetings and policy discussions by Trump officials.
Who's getting his ass whooped now? Originally Posted by lustylad
So here are the FACTS
1. Trump associates and/or campaign officials were picked up in incidental collection prior to January 20, 2017. 100% LEGAL
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...pped-his-phon/
The FBI and House Committees determined Trump's claims to be unsubstantiated. FACT.
The chairman of the House intelligence committee said that the panel has found no evidence to substantiate President Donald Trump's claim his campaign headquarters was wiretapped on orders from President Barack Obama.
"We don't have any evidence that that took place," Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said. The FBI also debunked the Trump Tower wiretapping allegation. FACT.
https://www.usnews.com/news/politics...tapping-claims
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/20/u...ald-trump.html
2. The FBI works as an independent arm, who's findings are then reported to The DOJ. Saying "working for the Obama administration" is inaccurate with innuendo and highly misleading, but of course, you intended it that way.
http://www.factcheck.org/2017/03/sti...-mr-president/
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/20/u...ald-trump.html
3. Irrelevant due to fact #1.
4 &5. Once again, the finding were legal obtained. It was yet to be known to public as to the how this will entangle Trump associates. If Information is gained during incidental collect, this can be used in a separate investigation. James Comey confirmed that these consumers (DOJ) “can ask the collectors to unmask.” But the unmasking authority “resides with those who collected the information.” Therefore the FBI makes the final call on unmasking and has authority to NOT unmask if they feel it is in violation of rights. FACT. Blasting the FBI for the actual unmasking is attacking the very integrity of the FBI. (But he right wing "party over country" will attack anything, try anything to protect Trump.)
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...apping-charge/
6 & 7. "It has been reported" "It has been reported"... By whom? Far right conspiracy sources. It's funny how these are played off as "FACTS" These are not FACTS, jackass. Just your hurt feeling because you are getting stomped on.
how many times have you spinelessly ducked MY question? Is it 5 or 6? I'm losing count. Originally Posted by lustyladOh, And I'll throw in an answer to this irrelevant question. If Trump had done the same to Obama, i.e. legally obtain information under the same context? It would be legal and I would be forced to accept it, regardless of whether I liked the outcome. But that didn't happen and won't happen. It is Crooked Liar Trump and his crooked associates who are the ones saddled with this reality.
Who's getting his ass whooped now? It always has been and always will be
the grand loser: lustyturd. Dispatched with ease.