Constructive Feedback...:)

Lexieinhouston's Avatar
Why the hell would her White Knights want to go after me, I'm on her side, lol? Oh...never mind, I've quit trying to figure out how your mind works, ha.


~
DEAR_JOHN's Avatar
And you would ban him for repeating info that the OP has said herself already...

Yep...it's been a long time since you were relevant....now you're also unbalanced...

P.S.-My saying you won't get another warning wasn't a threat...it was me saying that they've been warned...when her WK starts outing people here in retaliation for this, they'll see what they're continuing down this road got them...

Everyone...leave this alone... Originally Posted by Wakeup
Nah, I'm not anywhere near being unbalanced. You and your 'I'm so fucking smarter than everybody else' and your so superior attitude don't have any rite to call anybody unbalanced or anything else.

You and I have one thing in common. Neither one of us adds a thing to ECCIE. Thing is I will probably be out of here by January 2015, while you'll never leave. This is the only place you can shit all over people and nobody will put you in your place. No matter how low your place may be. Your ego demands you stay on this site.
Wakeup's Avatar
You don't know what the sides are, let alone who is on any of them...with her WK, there are no sides...only acceptable collateral damage...

It's WAY to dangerous, for anyone, to be dealing with any of this...let it go before it goes somewhere you don't want it to...and don't have anything to do with either of them again...
Lexieinhouston's Avatar
Well, I said what I wanted to, so mark this day on your calendar: The day Lexie decided to take my advice on something. xoxo



~
SpiceItUp's Avatar
6. You are not supposed to give details about our sessions like 2 bells etc. I am the one who has right to write a review. Originally Posted by Mickdicker
^Small point of order. You were both there. She's entitled to discuss events that occurred just as you are as long as neither of you violate forum guidelines. Nothing she said violates any guidelines. Originally Posted by SpiceItUp
What was it about his response that you felt the need to jump in? Looks like you are posturing for the lady sir. Originally Posted by Whispers
Really Whispers? 200+ posts in this thread and this is the one you choose to make a comment on? Ok then...

posturing? Hardly.

Re-read point #6, I was responding to the intimation that she was not entitled to discuss events that occurred. To the contrary, ladies are welcome to post a coed rebuttal to any review they receive and are free to talk about details if they wish so long as they don't violate guidelines.

I jumped in because personally I feel like part of the moderator role is educating people about the rules and providing transparency as to their application and interpretation. I fail to see the issue.
DEAR_JOHN's Avatar
You don't know what the sides are, let alone who is on any of them...with her WK, there are no sides...only acceptable collateral damage...

It's WAY to dangerous, for anyone, to be dealing with any of this...let it go before it goes somewhere you don't want it to...and don't have anything to do with either of them again... Originally Posted by Wakeup
You're so pathetic. Most of your entire life and being is tied to this site. How sad is this?

Charlie says hello.

Whispers's Avatar
Whispers, shut up, and take your drama back to San Antonio...I'm not going to let it happen here... Originally Posted by Wakeup
LOL..... Come on Wakeup...... Don't be so afraid.....

My question has nothing to do with the OP or the thread.

It is a question of the MOD that jumped in immediately after a fair and well written response that IMO was meant to be an intimidating stand.

Everything else spiraling out of control is just typical of the multiple handles Ricky Boy is using in this thread to keep the drama flowing.

Really man.... I can't understand you letting that slip by..... Nothing to do with the OP or subject matter .... Just the posturing of the MOD.....

I haven't read anything over here in a while and to be totally honest in regard to the main subject matter of the thread..... YAWN!

But come on....

Is the below really relevant in regards to someone posting material already posted elsewhere on the board?


I would caution you against going down this path toward revealing or threatening to reveal personal information about members. Not only is it against the guidelines of this forum but it is a breach of basic human decency to bring private things of a personal nature onto a public message board.

In this particular instance she has made mention of it herself on a previous thread. Perhaps you were aware of this perhaps not. Either way this is your one warning to tread carefully.

-Spice

#5 - Outing or threats of outing are taken seriously. Membership here is anonymous and for the privacy of our members it will remain that way. That means any effort or attempt to connect a person's real world information to their username on this board will be dealt with swiftly and harshly. This includes real names, employment, medical info, addresses past or present, images, criminal or driving record, etc. We expect everyone who participates here to respect and go to great lengths to protect the anonymity and privacy of one another. Reckless disregard or accidental outing will also be taken very seriously.
Originally Posted by SpiceItUp
Wakeup's Avatar
I told you once...take your shit back to San Antonio...it's not going to happen here...acknowledge you understand me...
I've stayed out of this for the most part, but I'll say this...

Unless you've been paying attention. To the San Antonio forums for the past two years, you have no idea what Slave Guinevere, and her WK, are about...you might want to do your research before you step into the middle of that...it can get VERY dangerous...

Just sayin'... Originally Posted by Wakeup
All the talk bout research,honesty,discretion,an ti-outing bs is just that TALK..

Grandma is bad news in S.A

All the pathetic captains in here gonna learn the hard way
Wakeup's Avatar
Houstonians...don't respond to any of them...they're trying to bring an extremely dangerous situation, involving Whispers, Slave, her WK, and various other individuals, from San Antonio into our forums. The moderators cannot lock the thread unless it's for hijacking, nothing else remotely applies, so they won't. If you allow them to do this, it's just going to put all of you in danger...and I mean that in a very literal sense.

Don't...allow...them...to do this here...ignore it...
Whispers's Avatar
Really Whispers? 200+ posts in this thread and this is the one you choose to make a comment on? Ok then...

posturing? Hardly.

Re-read point #6, I was responding to the intimation that she was not entitled to discuss events that occurred. To the contrary, ladies are welcome to post a coed rebuttal to any review they receive and are free to talk about details if they wish so long as they don't violate guidelines.

I jumped in because personally I feel like part of the moderator role is educating people about the rules and providing transparency as to their application and interpretation. I fail to see the issue.
Originally Posted by SpiceItUp
Seems heavy handed and intimidating in nature to me. Just like your recent foray in posting guidelines in regards to subject matter that is allowed? Why?

In regards to "both people being there so both have the right to discuss matters it's long been felt that Provider's disclosing details of a session violates a member's expectation of privacy in a session. Not much different than the standing policy that if 10 people are at a party it is not appropriate to mention that someone else was there before they acknowledge it them self. If your logic applies we should throw out all the edits made all over the forums in other cities in regards to those get togethers...
Whispers's Avatar
I told you once...take your shit back to San Antonio...it's not going to happen here...acknowledge you understand me... Originally Posted by Wakeup
LOL.... I hear you Wake Up..... My questions are simply in regards to the MOD moderating the thread while Rocker Rick, a banned member, runs rampant throughout it with no worries or concerns.....

YOU see it and recognize it..... I see it and recognize it...... DH sees it and recognizes it...

But a guy that writes a review is getting the warnings?

Kind of hypocritical isn't it?

Once again... I have NO comment regarding the OP, the REVIEWER, the review or the subject matter......

After years of not reading the forums much here I just had to laugh at where "moderation" is occurring....
Wakeup's Avatar
Then leave...
DEAR_JOHN's Avatar
Houstonians...don't respond to any of them...they're trying to bring an extremely dangerous situation, involving Whispers, Slave, her WK, and various other individuals, from San Antonio into our forums. The moderators cannot lock the thread unless it's for hijacking, nothing else remotely applies, so they won't. If you allow them to do this, it's just going to put all of you in danger...and I mean that in a very literal sense.

Don't...allow...them...to do this here...ignore it... Originally Posted by Wakeup
Then leave... Originally Posted by Wakeup
So you can't follow your own suggestion?

How funny is this...........and you called me 'unbalanced'.
chicagoboy's Avatar
What's become of monkey man?