Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator didn’t score again!

CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 12-10-2012, 02:23 PM
quit responding and feeding the lil troll.

The End
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Hold on a second? IS THIS NOW ABOUT SPELLING AND PUNCTUATION?

Holy chit!

How about a dick measuring contest? I'm sure COG will let IBMeltingdown borrow his magnifying glass!
IB Hankerwrong is in a fight with practically everyone on this board - on both sides of the political aisle - and yet he still thinks he is never wrong.

Well, he may be wrong, but he is never doubtful.
I B Hankering's Avatar
quit responding and feeding the lil troll.

The End Originally Posted by CJ7
. . . or CBJ7 might have his little feelings hurt. Poor CBJ7.



Hold on a second? IS THIS NOW ABOUT SPELLING AND PUNCTUATION?

Holy chit!

How about a dick measuring contest? I'm sure COG will let IBMeltingdown borrow his magnifying glass! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
No contest, Assup. You are the biggest dick on the board, but you do have the unfair advantage of measuring from the shoulders up, Assup!

BTW Assup, just so you don't feel neglected in the biggest Kool Aid sotted ignoramus contest, here's one where you had your ignorant ass handed to you:

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...&postcount=160

HINT: Here's a summary of the post that repudiated your asinine assertion, Assup:

Contempt of court citation

In April 1999, about two months after being acquitted by the Senate, Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator was cited by Federal District Judge Susan Webber Wright for civil contempt of court for his "willful failure" to obey her repeated orders to testify truthfully in the Paula Jones sexual harassment lawsuit. For this citation, Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator was assessed a $90,000 fine, and the matter was referred to the Arkansas Supreme Court to see if disciplinary action would be appropriate.[24]
Regarding Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator's January 17, 1998, deposition where he was placed under oath, the judge wrote:
"Simply put, the president's deposition testimony regarding whether he had ever been alone with Ms. (Monica) Lewinsky was intentionally false, and his statements regarding whether he had ever engaged in sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky likewise were intentionally false...." [/B][/SIZE] [24] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeach...f_Bill_Clinton

PERJURY

: the voluntary violation of an oath or vow either by swearing to what is untrue or by omission to do what has been promised under oath : false swearing. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perjury
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
No wonder Assup has no credibility.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
. . . or CBJ7 might have his little feelings hurt. Poor CBJ7.



No contest, Assup. You are the biggest dick on the board, but you do have the unfair advantage of measuring from the shoulders up, Assup!

BTW Assup, just so you don't feel neglected in the biggest Kool Aid sotted ignoramus contest, here's one where you had your ignorant ass handed to you:

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...&postcount=160

HINT: Here's a summary of the post that repudiated your asinine assertion, Assup:

Contempt of court citation

In April 1999, about two months after being acquitted by the Senate, Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator was cited by Federal District Judge Susan Webber Wright for civil contempt of court for his "willful failure" to obey her repeated orders to testify truthfully in the Paula Jones sexual harassment lawsuit. For this citation, Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator was assessed a $90,000 fine, and the matter was referred to the Arkansas Supreme Court to see if disciplinary action would be appropriate.[24]
Regarding Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator's January 17, 1998, deposition where he was placed under oath, the judge wrote:
"Simply put, the president's deposition testimony regarding whether he had ever been alone with Ms. (Monica) Lewinsky was intentionally false, and his statements regarding whether he had ever engaged in sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky likewise were intentionally false...." [/B][/SIZE] [24] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeach...f_Bill_Clinton

PERJURY

: the voluntary violation of an oath or vow either by swearing to what is untrue or by omission to do what has been promised under oath : false swearing. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perjury Originally Posted by I B Hankering
This looks like he was fined $90K for contempt. Not perjury. Not sexual harassment, rape or any sexual misconduct of any kind.

I FAIL TO SEE WHERE HE WAS CONVICTED OF PERJURY OR ANY SEX CRIME.

You're a fucking idiot. Plain and simple. I believe your ignorance is why you continue to get your ass handed to you by anybody and everybody.

I think I've got to take you off IGNORE now so I can deal with you appropriately.

WELCOME TO HELL SHITHEAD!

CuteOldGuy's Avatar
What part of that isn't perjury? Assup, your ignorance is only hell for you. The rest of think it's funny.

<<< Assup // Everyone else >>>
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 12-10-2012, 03:24 PM
This looks like he was fined $90K for contempt. Not perjury. Not sexual harassment, rape or any sexual misconduct of any kind.

I FAIL TO SEE WHERE HE WAS CONVICTED OF PERJURY OR ANY SEX CRIME.

You're a fucking idiot. Plain and simple. I believe your ignorance is why you continue to get your ass handed to you by anybody and everybody.

I think I've got to take you off IGNORE now so I can deal with you appropriately.

WELCOME TO HELL SHITHEAD!

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Come now, you should know better that to expect IBSlagHeap to be honest! When you're a professional liar and delusionist like he is, facts just get in the way. They are "inconvenient", so he ignores them.
I B Hankering's Avatar
This looks like he was fined $90K for contempt. Not perjury. Not sexual harassment, rape or any sexual misconduct of any kind.

I FAIL TO SEE WHERE HE WAS CONVICTED OF PERJURY OR ANY SEX CRIME.

You're a fucking idiot. Plain and simple. I believe your ignorance is why you continue to get your ass handed to you by anybody and everybody.

I think I've got to take you off IGNORE now so I can deal with you appropriately.

WELCOME TO HELL SHITHEAD!

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Hey, Assup! You've been lying about the "ignore button" for several days now, asshole. BTW, you dithering asshole, note how the definition for "perjury" doesn't require a conviction, you stupid SOB!




Come now, you should know better that to expect IBSlagHeap to be honest! When you're a professional liar and delusionist like he is, facts just get in the way. They are "inconvenient", so he ignores them. Originally Posted by Old-T
You’re an inveterate liar and equivocator, Old-goaT. It's you who dodges facts and distorts the truth.
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 12-10-2012, 04:34 PM
You’re an inveterate liar and equivocator, Old-goaT. It's you who dodges facts and distorts the truth. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
It must be nice to live in your world where everything is clear and definitive. Where good is good and evil is anyone who doesn't agree with you.

But the real world is not that way. It is a thousand shade of gray. Very few things are "right" and fewer still are completely "wrong". But your simple mind can't grasp that, can you? Most of what I post are OPINIONS. That's what a lot of people DO on a board like this. When I state my OPINION that your avatar reminds me of a dirty old man or a blow up doll, it is an OPINION. When I point out that they are YOUR avatars, that is a fact. When I post that you have an increadibly filthy mouth (at least when you post here) that too is a FACT. See the difference?
IB the spunk eater has won the "golden Lips" award.He can throw 'em and blow 'em before they can flip him and dick him.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Actually, if you're going to call someone a MURDERER, then you better be prepared to offer up evidence of a conviction, IBMeltingdown.

If you're going to call someone a THIEF, then you better be prepared to offer up evidence of a conviction, IBMeltingdown.

If you're going to call someone a RAPIST, then you better be prepared to offer up evidence of a conviction, IBMeltingdown.

If you're going to call someone a PERJURIST (a crime) and a SEXUAL PREDATOR (more criminal offenses), then you better be prepared to offer up evidence of a conviction, IBMeltingdown.

In this country, you are not a convicted ANYTHING until you're convicted.

Either show some evidence of a fucking conviction against President William J. Clinton or admit that you're just flapping your gums with no basis in fact. AGAIN! Either prove your claim or admit you're wrong AGAIN IBMeltingdown. This will be tonight's exercise.

Of course, you don't need to be convicted to be a DIPSHIT. You just have to wake up...

DIPSHIT!

Now STFU and go back to picking peanuts out of poop!
Well gotta respect Clinton for one thing , he is gettin it for free or did ! Cant say that about the rest of us.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 12-10-2012, 06:18 PM
Well gotta respect Clinton for one thing , he is gettin it for free or did ! Cant say that about the rest of us. Originally Posted by steamyromance
how many 50 year olds on this board would turn down a 20 something year old chippie with a willing willing mouth and pouty lips 4 FREE ?

if IBBQ says he would hes a lying son of a bitch ...again
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 12-10-2012, 06:47 PM
Either show some evidence of a fucking conviction against President William J. Clinton or admit that you're just flapping your gums with no basis in fact. AGAIN! Either prove your claim or admit you're wrong AGAIN IBMeltingdown. This will be tonight's exercise. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Anyone give odds? His track record says ain't no way in hell he produces evidence. Instead he will:
--claim he did
--accuse you of hijacking the thread
--ignore the question.

I have to pull up a chair and some popcorn for this one!