Tulsa Time!!!!!!

The point I was trying to make. Some times I don't always convey the right words or tone which is why I don't make a living at this. Originally Posted by HedonistForever

I was referring to Eccielovers post that time.

How many people watched Biden’s town hall?????? Zero!!!!! Originally Posted by bambino

to be more precise.. under 100.

to be more precise.. under 100. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

On television Dilbert. 20 were invited to attend. I don’t think it was televised.

John Tesh!!!!!




!BAHHAAAAAAA

John Tesh!!!!!




!BAHHAAAAAAA Originally Posted by matchingmole

mole's net worth .. ZERO.


John Tesh .. 30 MILLION


https://www.celebritynetworth.com/ri...esh-net-worth/


BAHHAHAHAHAAAAAAA

Exactly!!!!!!! I sat and watched. Sipping some Knob Creek without a mask!!!!!! Originally Posted by bambino

https://www.forbes.com/sites/markjoy.../#539539711fe2

8 Million Viewers Watch Fox News Coverage Of Trump’s Tulsa Rally

Trump's newest campaign slogan .. "Thousands came .. MILLIONS watched!"


BAHHAHAHAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

"And nobody gave a fuck."

BAHHAHAHAAAA

Looks like someone woke up with dirty diapers ...!

Looks like someone woke up with dirty diapers ...! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Is that a holdover from your not so distant potty training days, junior? When your Huggies had to be checked each morning?

I didn't have you or anybody else in mind when I said that but I think if one reads the responses above, it is clear ( at lest to me ) that the rally and it's attendance did not/ does not matter in the least. Will one single person that was already voting for Trump change their mind because the arena wasn't full? NO, they will not. Period! Originally Posted by HedonistForever

I agree. That was never in doubt. The goal of such rallies though is to influence undecided voters to vote for Trump. Doubtful that happened either.

I also watched the rally. Trump spent more than 10 minutes explaining why he took so long walking down the ramp at West Point and using 2 hands to drink a glass of water. Once he focused on attacking Biden he became effective in getting a message across.

I also watched the rally. Trump spent more than 10 minutes explaining why he took so long walking down the ramp at West Point and using 2 hands to drink a glass of water. Once he focused ... Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

... Apparently, you lost the message in his story.

It's the same message when people make fun of the number of people who attended the rally after having spent days/weeks whining about how dangerous it is to attend the Rally and the Mayor of Tulsa zaps those waiting to get in with a curfew....and then the television audience is revealed.

You and yours spend your time criticizing Trump and trying to demoralize his support with your bullshit ...but NEVER (OR RARELY) saying anything positive about YOUR CANDIDATE! You and yours (LapDog!) are TRANSPARENT!

LapDog is the type of immature trash supporting Biden aka BITTEN! Afraid of books and statues.

... Apparently, you lost the message in his story.

It's the same message when people make fun of the number of people who attended the rally after having spent days/weeks whining about how dangerous it is to attend the Rally and the Mayor of Tulsa zaps those waiting to get in with a curfew....and then the television audience is revealed.

You and yours spend your time criticizing Trump and trying to demoralize his support with your bullshit ...but NEVER (OR RARELY) saying anything positive about YOUR CANDIDATE! You and yours (LapDog!) are TRANSPARENT!

LapDog is the type of immature trash supporting Biden aka BITTEN! Afraid of books and statues. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I happen to think Trump's explanation for taking his time walking down to ramp was right on. No need to spend 10 minutes talking about it. I also think too much time is being spent on his statement that we should lower the level of coronavirus testing. It was a joke.

Here are the primary issues on the minds of voters and where I believe either Trump or Biden is better suited to enact legislation to better the country:

The economy -- advantage Trump.
Race relations -- advantage Biden.
Health care -- advantage Biden.
Immigration -- advantage Biden.
Foreign affairs -- advantage Biden.
Climate change -- advantage Biden.
Budget deficit -- advantage Biden.
LGBTQ rights -- advantage Biden.
Terrorism and national security -- even.
Tax reform that is equally fair to all -- advantage Biden.
Education -- advantage Biden.
Distribution of wealth -- advantage Biden.
Abortion -- depends on which side of the fence one stands
Gun policy -- see abortion.

Obviously I don't expect you or any other Trump supporter to agree with me but these are my OPINIONS.

Those are not equally weighted.

Good economy alone is enough for re-election.

Let's see if the "I" shape recovery happens.

I agree. That was never in doubt. The goal of such rallies though is to influence undecided voters to vote for Trump. Doubtful that happened either.

I also watched the rally. Trump spent more than 10 minutes explaining why he took so long walking down the ramp at West Point and using 2 hands to drink a glass of water. Once he focused on attacking Biden he became effective in getting a message across. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Yes, that's why I said it wasn't a net positive for Trump. That did not denote a negative for Trump, just that I don't think he garnered the enthusiasm factor to have attracted any additional votes as a result.

As we've seen in this thread alone, the dialog of the whole event has now turned into some level of protectionism of Trump's PR screwup in touting the expected massive attendance.

The only positive being discussed is how much better Trump can do rallies than Biden.

It should have been a show of massive enthusiasm and a discussion of the Trump campaign message in order to attract the undecideds. It's proved to be neither.

Anyone planning on voting Trump will still continue to plan to vote Trump, but he didn't make a dent in recruiting any undecideds.

Yes, that's why I said it wasn't a net positive for Trump. That did not denote a negative for Trump, just that I don't think he garnered the enthusiasm factor to have attracted any additional votes as a result.

As we've seen in this thread alone, the dialog of the whole event has now turned into some level of protectionism of Trump's PR screwup in touting the expected massive attendance.

The only positive being discussed is how much better Trump can do rallies than Biden.

It should have been a show of massive enthusiasm and a discussion of the Trump campaign message in order to attract the undecideds. It's proved to be neither.

Anyone planning on voting Trump will still continue to plan to vote Trump, but he didn't make a dent in recruiting any undecideds. Originally Posted by eccielover

8 million watched the rally. Are you dismissing that? Plus people who watched on line. It’s my opinion that thousands of people show up in a closed arena during a pandemic and possible violence counts for something. And Comparing Trumps event to Biden’s last week is pertinent. They’re opponents.It does show a deep contrast. I did say the Trump campaign will have to rethink the rallies. People aren’t ready to gather in masses yet. Unless you’re a protester or looter. Did the Trump campaign miscalculate this? Yes. Is it some sort of black eye? No. BTW, how do you know Trump didn’t change any minds? That’s a Speedyesque statement. You don’t know. Neither do the pollls.