BREAKING ��
The Supreme Court Justices of the United States have been assigned 24-hour Military protection.
The guise is that the Justices need protection due to the Roe vs. Wade decision that is impending.
That is false.
The “leak” which occurred this past week, regarding the SCOTUS opinion to overturn Roe vs. Wade, was fake.
This was designed to distract the Left from the REAL decision that has been in front of the court:
The 2020 General Election.
Within the next several weeks, the SCOTUS will be overturning the 2020 General Election, due to massive fraud in every single state.
You have been watching a movie.
I hope you enjoyed the most important time of human history.
It’s coming to an end ��
BAHAHAHAHA Originally Posted by bambino
- Why_Yes_I_Do
- 05-05-2022, 11:12 AM
But it is still legal to hope for both. Right? Well.. except in NY, NJ and California I s'pose, even though I'm doubtful on either
- Yssup Rider
- 05-05-2022, 11:46 AM
Wanna bet that the 2020 election is overturned, boyz?
- WTF
- 05-05-2022, 11:51 AM
BREAKING ��And folks wonder why I call bambino the most gullible Q supporter on the planet
The Supreme Court Justices of the United States have been assigned 24-hour Military protection.
The guise is that the Justices need protection due to the Roe vs. Wade decision that is impending.
That is false.
The “leak” which occurred this past week, regarding the SCOTUS opinion to overturn Roe vs. Wade, was fake.
This was designed to distract the Left from the REAL decision that has been in front of the court:
The 2020 General Election.
Within the next several weeks, the SCOTUS will be overturning the 2020 General Election, due to massive fraud in every single state.
You have been watching a movie.
I hope you enjoyed the most important time of human history.
It’s coming to an end ��
BAHAHAHAHA Originally Posted by bambino
- bambino
- 05-05-2022, 12:31 PM
- WTF
- 05-05-2022, 12:45 PM
- texassapper
- 05-05-2022, 12:48 PM
LOL... Like the whole Black lives matter scam... they matter... just not in the womb.
- bambino
- 05-05-2022, 12:49 PM
- eccieuser9500
- 05-05-2022, 01:24 PM
Unfortunate typo on my part. Should have read: So why are you even leveraging the Civil War to talk about abortion or illegal alien birthing rights anyway? (Ouch)
I'll leave you on the Ignore list to play Dodge Ball by yourself. Won't lie, I had hopes for a bit there. Silly me. Fair chance over.
[INDENT][INDENT] Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do
Oh well. Couldn't volley my return serve. Not much of a research guy. Too bad. I thought you could.
Brilliant Ostrich technique Kung Fu hustle move. Put me on ignore so as not to see me ask if you can answer my return serve.
- eccieuser9500
- 05-05-2022, 01:35 PM
- bambino
- 05-05-2022, 01:52 PM
- Tiny
- 05-05-2022, 02:26 PM
For my friend eccieuser. You might find this of interest.
Excerpt from
Repeal of Roe risks exacerbating the US’s most shameful statistic
Abortion ban would increase the country’s dreadful maternal mortality rate and fall hardest on the most vulnerable
If the US Supreme Court goes ahead with the repeal of Roe vs Wade later this year, the fallout will be far-reaching. Abortion would almost certainly become illegal or heavily restricted in 22 states and would be under severe threat in at least four others.
As such, 27mn women of childbearing age would have their reproductive rights rolled back by 50 years. By this summer, most of them may find themselves living under broadly the same abortion rules as those in Sierra Leone, Congo-Brazzaville and just 22 other countries worldwide.
The most damning part of such an enormous backward leap is who would bear the brunt of the ban, and what this tells us about the dire state of maternal health in the world’s richest healthcare system.
In 2019, there were 23.8 abortions carried out per 1,000 non-Hispanic black women in the US, compared to 11.7 among Hispanic women and 6.6 among white women. In 1994, one in four US abortion patients had an income below the federal poverty line. By 2014, it was one in two. In other words, a ban would disproportionately affect black women and those least able to afford to cross state boundaries for the procedure.
The negative socio-economic impacts of unwanted births are well-established. A study led by Diana Greene Foster at the University of California, San Francisco found that US women denied an abortion are more likely than peers who receive one to experience long-term economic hardship.
(Aside: The article is accompanied by a table showing the probability a woman will not have enough money for basic necessities if she's denied an abortion is 5X higher than women granted an abortion. The probability of poor maternal bonding with the child is 5X higher. These are measured at 5 years after the denial or provision of an abortion.)
Women’s health is also at stake. Many think abortion a much riskier procedure than birth but this is wrong. In 2020, 861 US women lost their lives during or immediately after pregnancy, for a rate of 23.8 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. Over the past six years, there have been 0.41 abortion-related deaths per 100,000 legal abortions, an almost 60-times smaller risk.
Along with deaths from guns and opioids, maternal mortality must rank as one of the US’s most shameful statistics. Its rate of 23.8 deaths per 100,000 live births ranks 36th out of the 38 OECD countries, behind the likes of Chile, Turkey and Lithuania, and ahead of only Colombia, Latvia and Mexico.
Moreover, the maternal mortality rate for non-Hispanic black US women is more than double that, at 55.3 deaths per 100,000. So the group most likely to be directly affected by a ban would also pay a far steeper cost in terms of health....
As is almost invariably the case, when something bad happens in the US, it happens disproportionately to black people and those on low incomes. The repeal of Roe vs Wade is no exception, though the harms will be felt by every woman. The US may claim to be a developed nation, but when it comes to women’s health, this could not be further from the truth.
https://www.ft.com/content/ebf64d7b-...5-27dfddb111e8
Excerpt from
Repeal of Roe risks exacerbating the US’s most shameful statistic
Abortion ban would increase the country’s dreadful maternal mortality rate and fall hardest on the most vulnerable
If the US Supreme Court goes ahead with the repeal of Roe vs Wade later this year, the fallout will be far-reaching. Abortion would almost certainly become illegal or heavily restricted in 22 states and would be under severe threat in at least four others.
As such, 27mn women of childbearing age would have their reproductive rights rolled back by 50 years. By this summer, most of them may find themselves living under broadly the same abortion rules as those in Sierra Leone, Congo-Brazzaville and just 22 other countries worldwide.
The most damning part of such an enormous backward leap is who would bear the brunt of the ban, and what this tells us about the dire state of maternal health in the world’s richest healthcare system.
In 2019, there were 23.8 abortions carried out per 1,000 non-Hispanic black women in the US, compared to 11.7 among Hispanic women and 6.6 among white women. In 1994, one in four US abortion patients had an income below the federal poverty line. By 2014, it was one in two. In other words, a ban would disproportionately affect black women and those least able to afford to cross state boundaries for the procedure.
The negative socio-economic impacts of unwanted births are well-established. A study led by Diana Greene Foster at the University of California, San Francisco found that US women denied an abortion are more likely than peers who receive one to experience long-term economic hardship.
(Aside: The article is accompanied by a table showing the probability a woman will not have enough money for basic necessities if she's denied an abortion is 5X higher than women granted an abortion. The probability of poor maternal bonding with the child is 5X higher. These are measured at 5 years after the denial or provision of an abortion.)
Women’s health is also at stake. Many think abortion a much riskier procedure than birth but this is wrong. In 2020, 861 US women lost their lives during or immediately after pregnancy, for a rate of 23.8 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. Over the past six years, there have been 0.41 abortion-related deaths per 100,000 legal abortions, an almost 60-times smaller risk.
Along with deaths from guns and opioids, maternal mortality must rank as one of the US’s most shameful statistics. Its rate of 23.8 deaths per 100,000 live births ranks 36th out of the 38 OECD countries, behind the likes of Chile, Turkey and Lithuania, and ahead of only Colombia, Latvia and Mexico.
Moreover, the maternal mortality rate for non-Hispanic black US women is more than double that, at 55.3 deaths per 100,000. So the group most likely to be directly affected by a ban would also pay a far steeper cost in terms of health....
As is almost invariably the case, when something bad happens in the US, it happens disproportionately to black people and those on low incomes. The repeal of Roe vs Wade is no exception, though the harms will be felt by every woman. The US may claim to be a developed nation, but when it comes to women’s health, this could not be further from the truth.
https://www.ft.com/content/ebf64d7b-...5-27dfddb111e8
- bambino
- 05-05-2022, 02:55 PM
Well Tiny, abortions kill more blacks than any other reason in America. Over 38% of abortions are had by AA women. But they constitute 10% of the population. That’s Black genocide. Just imagine the political clout they could have if they weren’t killing off their own race? How many Thomas Sowells, Ben Carson’s, Bo Jackson’s never got a chance at life?
https://www.grrtl.org/genocide/
Over 20 million black women have had abortions since 1973
https://rtl.org/multicultural-outrea...on-statistics/
https://www.grrtl.org/genocide/
Over 20 million black women have had abortions since 1973
https://rtl.org/multicultural-outrea...on-statistics/
- texassapper
- 05-05-2022, 02:57 PM
- Salty Again
- 05-05-2022, 03:11 PM
WHATABOUTISM! ... 
- Tiny
- 05-05-2022, 03:13 PM
Well Tiny, abortions kill more blacks than any other reason in America. Over 38% of abortions are had by AA women. But they constitute 10% of the population. That’s Black genocide. Just imagine the political clout they could have if they weren’t killing off their own race? How many Thomas Sowells, Ben Carson’s, Bo Jackson’s never got a chance at life?No Bambino, heart disease, cancer and COVID, in that order, kill more blacks than other reasons.
https://www.grrtl.org/genocide/
Over 20 million black women have had abortions since 1973
https://rtl.org/multicultural-outrea...on-statistics/ Originally Posted by bambino
So you're a RAYCISS that wants to kill black babies...Hmmm, I'm a racist wannabe black baby killer. Interesting.
Black Lives Matter... so I've been told. Originally Posted by texassapper