Do you want us ....By "us" do you mean you and your partner, LukeWarm?
. Originally Posted by WTF
Or both of your personalities?
By "us" do you mean you and your partner, LukeWarm?
Or both of your personalities? Originally Posted by LexusLover
Here's the bottom line with Lube and WTF:I numbered them to save bandwidth .. and prevent your confusion.
1. Their logic doesn't work.
2. Their facts don't work.
3. Their threats of physical violence don't work.
4. Their name-calling doesn't work.
5. Their attempts at OUTING don't work.
6. Their ridiculing and marginalizing doesn't work.
7. Their attempts to get others BANNED don't work!
And their SELF-OUTING is HAUNTING THEM!
So their at their wits end, as if they had any wits at all! Originally Posted by LexusLover
Still whining about OUTING YOURSELF? What a baby!There you go supposing again...
Is that your new "ploy" to silence your intellectual superiors?
I guess the Mods can't ban you since you have a ....
..."Life Time" membership? Originally Posted by LexusLover
6 months ago I cut the cord so I don't watch Fox.Thread Topic ...for the feeble minded!
So what gives? Tonight I happened to be somewhere watching CNN and Anderson Cooper has some lady on talking like she was in actual attendance, imitating one of the ladies who is suing/has sued O'Reilly. The incredible thing is she's playing a role where she is one of the defendants and speaking as if the viewer has a front row seat portraying something as actually happened. But it is all hearsay. Of course, Cooper doesn't jump in.
Wasn't there a confidentiality agreement in place where none of the women were to testify as to the validity of the claims? I hear 4 or so women have made claims against Bill and that most of his advertisers have abandoned him. I don't see how that happens if the women signed a confidentiality agreement and it remains enforce.
I am reading were one of the confidentiality agreements goes back to 2004. How does this happen? Am I off on some of my facts? Originally Posted by gnadfly
I guess the Mods can't ban you since you have a ....WTFagboy purchased a lifetime membership when he figured out he couldn't earn Premium Access for submitting gay reviews. The mods won't ban him permanently because they know he would sue them for homo discrimination faster than those women sued O'Reilly.
..."Life Time" membership? Originally Posted by LexusLover
Meet me and DSK for a beer LL, I'll buy. Originally Posted by WTF
ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political ForumWTF is the classic abusive personality ....
Thousands take to the streets to demand chickenshit Twitler release his tax returns
04-17-2017, 09:16 AM Post #38
WTF
"Go find so ignorant whore to pick on LL....I'll fuck you up , you jack with me."
More violence. You need some anger management classes. Originally Posted by LexusLoverSo you are admitting you have a pussy and lustyladyboy has a clit?
I numbered them to save bandwidth .. and prevent your confusion.You reposted 2 year old pictures because you thought it had my personal information....you are trying to link my handle to my personal information.
Originally Posted by LexusLover
Here's the bottom line with Lube and WTF:
1. Their logic doesn't work.
2. Their facts don't work.
3. Their threats of physical violence don't work.
4. Their name-calling doesn't work.
5. Their attempts at OUTING don't work.
6. Their ridiculing and marginalizing doesn't work.
7. Their attempts to get others BANNED don't work!
And their SELF-OUTING is HAUNTING THEM!
So their at their wits end, as if they had any wits at all!
Is this a Number 7, AGAIN?
You get a pass on threatening me with physical violence and they are going to "ban" me for reposting a pic you posted just shy of a couple of years ago TO PROVE you build expensive houses?
Let's see .... you posted that pic just before you claimed you did your own financing to build them, right? And you think that's "OUTING" ....
..... REPOSTING WHAT YOU ALREADY POSTED????????
See No. 1!!!!! + No. 2!!!!!!
? Originally Posted by LexusLover
6 months ago I cut the cord so I don't watch Fox.OP
So what gives? Tonight I happened to be somewhere watching CNN and Anderson Cooper has some lady on talking like she was in actual attendance, imitating one of the ladies who is suing/has sued O'Reilly. The incredible thing is she's playing a role where she is one of the defendants and speaking as if the viewer has a front row seat portraying something as actually happened. But it is all hearsay. Of course, Cooper doesn't jump in.
Wasn't there a confidentiality agreement in place where none of the women were to testify as to the validity of the claims? I hear 4 or so women have made claims against Bill and that most of his advertisers have abandoned him. I don't see how that happens if the women signed a confidentiality agreement and it remains enforce.
I am reading were one of the confidentiality agreements goes back to 2004. How does this happen? Am I off on some of my facts? Originally Posted by gnadfly