Roe to be overturned!!!!

No Bambino, heart disease, cancer and COVID, in that order, kill more blacks than other reasons.



Hmmm, I'm a racist wannabe black baby killer. Interesting. Originally Posted by Tiny

Not according to my link

Per the CDC

Abortion is the number one killer of black lives in the United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, abortion kills more black people than HIV, homicide, diabetes, accident, cancer, and heart disease … combined.


Lil Fella, you don’t know what you don’t know. Which is a lot.

Hmmm, I'm a racist wannabe black baby killer. Interesting. Originally Posted by Tiny

Silence is violence... if you aren't actively anti-RAYCISS, then you're RAYCISS!

Good to see you admitting it, it's the first step of your struggle session...

Not according to my link

Per the CDC

Abortion is the number one killer of black lives in the United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, abortion kills more black people than HIV, homicide, diabetes, accident, cancer, and heart disease … combined.


Lil Fella, you don’t know what you don’t know. Which is a lot. Originally Posted by bambino

There are no references to abortion in the Bible. A frog is a lot more advanced than a human embryo. Why do you believe abortion in the first trimester is murder? If a woman uses Plan B is she killing her baby? How about taking birth control pills, which prevent fertilized eggs from attaching to the uterus?

I'd ask texassapper too but he kind of shot his credibility in my mind when he called me a racist wannabe black baby killer.

... Go on with ya, mates... Tiny is correct a lot o' times with some
of his posts... I surely enjoy when he pisses in WTF's stew
concerning the economy and what-not!

### Salty

There are no references to abortion in the Bible. A frog is a lot more advanced than a human embryo. Why do you believe abortion in the first trimester is murder? If a woman uses Plan B is she killing her baby? How about taking birth control pills, which prevent fertilized eggs from attaching to the uterus?

I'd ask texassapper too but he kind of shot his credibility in my mind when he called me a racist wannabe black baby killer. Originally Posted by Tiny

If bambino can make up abortion being the number one killer of black people...than income inequality is the number one killer of all races combined.

There are no references to abortion in the Bible. A frog is a lot more advanced than a human embryo. Why do you believe abortion in the first trimester is murder? If a woman uses Plan B is she killing her baby? How about taking birth control pills, which prevent fertilized eggs from attaching to the uterus?

I'd ask texassapper too but he kind of shot his credibility in my mind when he called me a racist wannabe black baby killer. Originally Posted by Tiny

So now your deflecting. I proved your claim dead wrong about AA deaths and you somehow swerve to the Bible. I was baptized a Catholic. I’ve had an epiphany about those creeps running the show 40yrs ago. Frauds and liars. But I believe life starts at conception. How else could a baby pop out of the womb? It doesn’t matter when you end it, you’re still ending a life. You, or whatever science you choose to reference, can’t refute that simple fact. We’re all on a journey, it starts at conception. Now, as WYID so wittingly described, go play dodgeball with yourself.

If bambino can make up abortion being the number one killer of black people...than income inequality is the number one killer of all races combined. Originally Posted by WTF

Of course you can’t read Professor Poofter. Neither can Tiny. I simply Stated the numbers from the CDC. You nitwit.

No Bambino, heart disease, cancer and COVID, in that order, kill more blacks than other reasons.



Hmmm, I'm a racist wannabe black baby killer. Interesting. Originally Posted by Tiny

Don't forget about crime.

Don't forget about crime. Originally Posted by Levianon17

The CDC includes that. Abortions end more AA life’s than all other factors. COMBINED

For my friend eccieuser. You might find this of interest.

Excerpt from

Repeal of Roe risks exacerbating the US’s most shameful statistic
Abortion ban would increase the country’s dreadful maternal mortality rate and fall hardest on the most vulnerable

If the US Supreme Court goes ahead with the repeal of Roe vs Wade later this year, the fallout will be far-reaching. Abortion would almost certainly become illegal or heavily restricted in 22 states and would be under severe threat in at least four others.

As such, 27mn women of childbearing age would have their reproductive rights rolled back by 50 years. By this summer, most of them may find themselves living under broadly the same abortion rules as those in Sierra Leone, Congo-Brazzaville and just 22 other countries worldwide.

The most damning part of such an enormous backward leap is who would bear the brunt of the ban, and what this tells us about the dire state of maternal health in the world’s richest healthcare system.

In 2019, there were 23.8 abortions carried out per 1,000 non-Hispanic black women in the US, compared to 11.7 among Hispanic women and 6.6 among white women. In 1994, one in four US abortion patients had an income below the federal poverty line. By 2014, it was one in two. In other words, a ban would disproportionately affect black women and those least able to afford to cross state boundaries for the procedure.

The negative socio-economic impacts of unwanted births are well-established. A study led by Diana Greene Foster at the University of California, San Francisco found that US women denied an abortion are more likely than peers who receive one to experience long-term economic hardship.

(Aside: The article is accompanied by a table showing the probability a woman will not have enough money for basic necessities if she's denied an abortion is 5X higher than women granted an abortion. The probability of poor maternal bonding with the child is 5X higher. These are measured at 5 years after the denial or provision of an abortion.)

Women’s health is also at stake. Many think abortion a much riskier procedure than birth but this is wrong. In 2020, 861 US women lost their lives during or immediately after pregnancy, for a rate of 23.8 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. Over the past six years, there have been 0.41 abortion-related deaths per 100,000 legal abortions, an almost 60-times smaller risk.

Along with deaths from guns and opioids, maternal mortality must rank as one of the US’s most shameful statistics. Its rate of 23.8 deaths per 100,000 live births ranks 36th out of the 38 OECD countries, behind the likes of Chile, Turkey and Lithuania, and ahead of only Colombia, Latvia and Mexico.

Moreover, the maternal mortality rate for non-Hispanic black US women is more than double that, at 55.3 deaths per 100,000. So the group most likely to be directly affected by a ban would also pay a far steeper cost in terms of health....

As is almost invariably the case, when something bad happens in the US, it happens disproportionately to black people and those on low incomes. The repeal of Roe vs Wade is no exception, though the harms will be felt by every woman. The US may claim to be a developed nation, but when it comes to women’s health, this could not be further from the truth.

https://www.ft.com/content/ebf64d7b-...5-27dfddb111e8
Originally Posted by Tiny

Very interesting.


For my "racist wannabe black baby killer" friend Tiny. You might find this interesting. Short but sweet.

Korematsu v. United States

Korematsu Dissenters Question Constitutionality Of Detentions


https://law.jrank.org/pages/24290/Ko...etentions.html

Justice Black declined to consider the question of legality or morality of the internment camps. The three dissenters--Justices Roberts, Murphy, and Jackson--vigorously attacked this refusal to confront what they regarded as the real issue in the case. Justice Roberts observed that, faced with "the dilemma that he dare not remain in his home, or voluntarily leave the area, without incurring criminal penalties . . . [Korematsu] did nothing." Justice Jackson added that "Korematsu . . . has been convicted of an act not commonly a crime. It consists merely of being present in the state whereof he is a citizen, near the place where he was born, and where all his life he has lived." Justice Murphy confronted head on the racism inherent in the internment order:

No adequate reason is given for the failure to treat these Japanese Americans on an individual basis by holding investigations and hearings to separate the loyal from the disloyal, as was done in the case of persons of German and Italian ancestry.

Citing the fact that there had been no imposition of martial law and that four months had elapsed after Pearl Harbor before the first exclusion order had been issued, Murphy questioned the claim of military necessity and dissented from what he called "this legalization of racism."

Jackson did not question the military's authority in making mass arrests, but he feared the ramifications of a Supreme Court endorsement of the internment orders:

[O]nce a judicial opinion rationalizes such an order to show that it conforms to the Constitution, or rather rationalizes the Constitution to show that the Constitution sanctions such an order, the Court for all time has validated the principle of racial discrimination in criminal procedure and of transplanting American citizens. The principle then lies about like a loaded weapon ready for the hand of any authority that can bring forward a plausible claim of an urgent need.

Korematsu was to provide the standard for judging legislation which is based on race or which violates fundamental constitutional rights. Black's "rigid scrutiny" became the Court's "strict scrutiny" standard. Korematsu has never been overruled, although in 1980 Congress authorized payments of $20,000 each to survivors of the internment camps.

Korematsu v. United States

https://traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5419337146.mp3

https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/323us214





For their next trick,

Republicans reinstate slavery.

If you have any morals or ethics. Doesn’t matter what religion you believe in, or any at all.



https://t.me/ChristianPatriotNews/9506

Very interesting.


For my "racist wannabe black baby killer" friend Tiny. You might find this interesting. Short but sweet.

Korematsu v. United States

Korematsu Dissenters Question Constitutionality Of Detentions


https://law.jrank.org/pages/24290/Ko...etentions.html







Korematsu v. United States

https://traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV5419337146.mp3

https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/323us214





For their next trick,

Republicans reinstate slavery. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Black tribes in Africa perfected intraracist slavery. Democrats invented the KKK and Jim Crow segregation. A Republican president saved the Union. a Republican president forced desegregation of schools.



your history is flawed little socialist. stop watching CNN.

However those Republicans you praise in today's party would be RINOs. Apparently the Conservturds on this board REFUSE to acknowledge certain things. You differentiate parties but REFUSE to acknowledge that philosiphophies have changed. From Lincoln to TR the Repuplican party was a LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE party. Maybe you shoud actually do some research and gain some obviously needed knowledge.

However those Republicans you praise in today's party would be RINOs. Apparently the Conservturds on this board REFUSE to acknowledge certain things. You differentiate parties but REFUSE to acknowledge that philosiphophies have changed. From Lincoln to TR the Repuplican party was a LIBERAL PROGRESSIVE party. Maybe you shoud actually do some research and gain some obviously needed knowledge. Originally Posted by chefnerd

liberal and progressive aren't always the same thing nerd. progressive means moving forward with new ideas and and embracing new eras. not all of them are liberal.