Have we decided to forgo the rules in favor of hostility?

OliviaHowards WK is in the house....this is starting to get fun.

Phantom....this is a thread on civility, your blatant disregard for said subject towards brother wu earns you a three week vacation! Originally Posted by WTF

So Olivia starts a thread bashing the moderation on eccie, you seem to agree and now you've seemed to back tracked and just want everyone to self moderate?

Do I have that straight?

See what I mean by passive/aggressive? Originally Posted by WTF

This doesn't answer any of my questions Pet.

OliviaHowards WK is in the house....this is starting to get fun.

Phantom....this is a thread on civility, your blatant disregard for said subject towards brother wu earns you a three week vacation! Originally Posted by WTF

my first post was completely civil and honest. what's your excuse for your lack of civility?

FYI: I don't WK anyone, but then you always do have a problem with original thoughts.

Pet, I do not mean to cast dispersions on your virtue or revile you with faggot innuendo like you do so many others. What I mean to do is discuss the definition of hypocrite, because I don’t think you know WTF it means.


Please, enlighten us all with your thesis that I am a hypocrite. We all await your reply.
Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

I will be short and sweet. You the self proclaimed feminist started numerous threads about the negative connotations of calling another woman whore.

Later, you called my sweet as honey 84 year old mother a whore because you incorrectly thought it would piss me off. All it did was provide food for fodder when you ask me to provide an example of a hypocrite. Look in the mirror sweet cheek, it is you the hypocrite staring back at you all along.

There are many other just in this thread of you calling people names in a civility thread, if the above example isn't enough.

What infractions are you referring to?
Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

I'm talking about you admitting to breaking rule #17 by stalking LD's post with numerous searches. .

And no, this isn’t junior high. This is where women come to market themselves to feed their families. The stakes a little higher here. Feel free to ponder that and then bestow your wisdom upon is on this topic too. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

Perhaps had they studied a tad more in Junior High, they would not be here thinking falsely that eccie is their only way to earn a buck.

If they are here to market their goods and are dumb as fuck, they should probably not get into pissing match's with seasoned posters.

If they are here to market their good and are bright lights, they probably can banter back and forth with folks that post on here with no problem but won't to much because they are indeed bright lights.

If their goods are above average , they can scratch St Chris eyes out and still get verified status.

You are trying to reverse millions of years of evolution.

That is all the blog advice a lady needs around here

The misnomer that you give two hoots about civility is perpetuated by you to promote your blog. Nothing more nothing less.

This doesn't answer any of my questions Pet. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

Questions asked, questions answered, sweet cheeks. Try a little patience before searching my posts.

Aren't you the one that put a link to this thread in a forum I post in and then tried to accuse me of posting in this forum and stalking you? Can you answer the question of why you lie and distort so damn much? Because a reasoned person would convict you of attempted entrapment. "I asked everyone in the forum WTF posts in to take a look at this thread and lo and behold WTF posts in my thread! He is stalking me!" What a joke.

my first post was completely civil and honest. what's your excuse for your lack of civility?

FYI: I don't WK anyone, but then you always do have a problem with original thoughts. Originally Posted by PhantomofTheOpera

Though it not an original thought , my excuse is that you were an asshole in your original post and evidently not self aware enough to even know. Now you are being a liar. You are WK'ing Ole Ho again.

opps

Though it not an original thought , my excuse is that you were an asshole in your original post and evidently not self aware enough to even know. Now you are being a liar. You are WK'ing Ole Ho again.
Originally Posted by WTF

*chuckling*. Thancks son, that was a good’en. Burger King has nothing on you with their Whoppers.

I'm talking about you admitting to breaking rule #17 by stalking LD's post with numerous searches. Originally Posted by WTF

Is WTF suggesting that mere searching through another's posts is a Guideline #17 cyber-stalking violation?

#17 - "Cyber Stalking" is a term that refers to the act of following another member around online. This may include persistent PMing of the other party, repeated ISOs about the other party, or excessive bumping of reviews or posting in threads about the other individual, whether it be positive or negative information posted. In any of these cases, whether staff deems that the behavior has crossed the line into cyber-stalking, or the "stalked" party complains to staff about the alleged behavior, staff will take the necessary steps to make it stop. Please avoid becoming involved in this type of conduct.

*chuckling*. Thancks son, that was a good’en. Burger King has nothing on you with their Whoppers. Originally Posted by PhantomofTheOpera

No problem old man....gent's in your age bracket have trouble remembering who and when they last WK'ed and lady.

No problem old man....gent's in your age bracket have trouble remembering who and when they last WK'ed and lady. Originally Posted by WTF

hahahahaha! Keep 'em flying just like you are doing.

Is WTF suggesting that mere searching through another's posts is a Guideline #17 cyber-stalking violation?

#17 - "Cyber Stalking" is a term that refers to the act of following another member around online. This may include persistent PMing of the other party, repeated ISOs about the other party, or excessive bumping of reviews or posting in threads about the other individual, whether it be positive or negative information posted. In any of these cases, whether staff deems that the behavior has crossed the line into cyber-stalking, or the "stalked" party complains to staff about the alleged behavior, staff will take the necessary steps to make it stop. Please avoid becoming involved in this type of conduct. Originally Posted by chicagoboy

now who would do a thing like that

I will be short and sweet. You the self proclaimed feminist started numerous threads about the negative connotations of calling another woman whore. Originally Posted by WTF

Correction, several people started threads. I only opened one.

Later, you called my sweet as honey 84 year old mother a whore because you incorrectly thought it would piss me off. All it did was provide food for fodder when you ask me to provide an example of a hypocrite. Look in the mirror sweet cheek, it is you the hypocrite staring back at you all along. Originally Posted by WTF

Well you did get pissed. All those threats. What does it matter? To hear you say it there’s no harm in the word. So…

I'm talking about you admitting to breaking rule #17 by stalking LD's post with numerous searches. . Originally Posted by WTF

Two searches does not a stalk make.

Perhaps had they studied a tad more in Junior High, they would not be here thinking falsely that eccie is their only way to earn a buck.

If they are here to market their goods and are dumb as fuck, they should probably not get into pissing match's with seasoned posters. Originally Posted by WTF

Don’t be ugly trying to get back at me. I’d be appalled to find that you really thought that
.

You are trying to reverse millions of years of evolution. Originally Posted by WTF

All by myself? No, the Women’s Movement is what is reversing thousands of years of evolution. Millions is more of your hyperbole.

Aren't you the one that put a link to this thread in a forum I post in and then tried to accuse me of posting in this forum and stalking you? Originally Posted by WTF

This has me laughing. When I post in Coed - where both of us rarely post - you're on it like white on rice. You may not have posted in Coed for months and yet, you find me. Pet, you're going to choke your self on your collar.

Is WTF suggesting that mere searching through another's posts is a Guideline #17 cyber-stalking violation? Originally Posted by chicagoboy

Yes, it's totally retarded. But he is free to run it up the flag pole though. I'll watch.

Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

You found that on my blog didn't you ! That was my Mission Statement LOL.

Linck: http://www.hookerinc.com/#!My-Missio...E-4625E0B0E86F

guilty

I need to share that with the hooker that want me to do a show and both the client and me pay her.
I taint paying you to fuck me old boy
well I taint doing a show if I can't sell it
rather buy my own time and do ya the way I want.