Constructive Feedback...:)

Charlie says hello.

Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

DJ......Isn't it way past your bedtime?

Best..Thread.. Ever.

Seems heavy handed and intimidating in nature to me. Just like your recent foray in posting guidelines in regards to subject matter that is allowed? Why?

In regards to "both people being there so both have the right to discuss matters it's long been felt that Provider's disclosing details of a session violates a member's expectation of privacy in a session. Not much different than the standing policy that if 10 people are at a party it is not appropriate to mention that someone else was there before they acknowledge it them self. If your logic applies we should throw out all the edits made all over the forums in other cities in regards to those get togethers... Originally Posted by Whispers

You're entitled to your opinions. I respectfully disagree with your assertion that it was in any way heavy handed.

People are welcome to, as you say, feel "that Provider's disclosing details of a session violates a member's expectation of privacy in a session". Please direct me to the guideline which disallows it.

Your analogy regarding social functions is flawed and does not apply here. It is presumed that both people in a session were present. In a social setting no such presumption of attendance exists. Regardless, I am unable to locate this "standing policy" of which you speak. Perhaps it exists, but as I said, that analogy does not apply here in the first place.

I encourage you to RTM or email staff should you have an issue with any moderator's actions.

LOL.... I hear you Wake Up..... My questions are simply in regards to the MOD moderating the thread while Rocker Rick, a banned member, runs rampant throughout it with no worries or concerns.....

YOU see it and recognize it..... I see it and recognize it...... DH sees it and recognizes it...

But a guy that writes a review is getting the warnings?

Kind of hypocritical isn't it?

Once again... I have NO comment regarding the OP, the REVIEWER, the review or the subject matter......

After years of not reading the forums much here I just had to laugh at where "moderation" is occurring.... Originally Posted by Whispers

If you had knowledge of a banned member's presence you were welcome to RTM it, I've seen no such item cross my path.

As always, feel free to RTM any moderator action or inaction and it will be addressed by a third party. We're under far more scrutiny than the general membership.


Spice

Houstonians...don't respond to any of them...they're trying to bring an extremely dangerous situation, involving Whispers, Slave, her WK, and various other individuals, from San Antonio into our forums. The moderators cannot lock the thread unless it's for hijacking, nothing else remotely applies, so they won't. If you allow them to do this, it's just going to put all of you in danger...and I mean that in a very literal sense.

Don't...allow...them...to do this here...ignore it... Originally Posted by Wakeup

This thread was focused on the review and rebuttal until you chimed in with that vague and ominous post about two years of SA and doing research. No one was even talking about it until you brought it up. Now look at it. So what, you're trying to get this thread closed by hijacking it into a whole different direction? Now you're warning everyone to step out of a issue you brought up. By all means, please go on...

Then leave... Originally Posted by Wakeup

Quit extending such a warm welcome!

What's become of monkey man? Originally Posted by chicagoboy

Rockerrick is back and will try to play by the rules till he blows out again so he had it guested..... At least that would be my guess..... More than a few here seem to recognize him in one of his many handles.....

He did seem to learn how to beat the system and tie the hands of those that cared about guidelines.....

I think he just wore them all out.... He has an abundance of energy.

You're entitled to your opinions. I respectfully disagree with your assertion that it was in any way heavy handed.

People are welcome to, as you say, feel "that Provider's disclosing details of a session violates a member's expectation of privacy in a session". Please direct me to the guideline which disallows it.

Your analogy regarding social functions is flawed and does not apply here. It is presumed that both people in a session were present. In a social setting no such presumption of attendance exists. Regardless, I am unable to locate this "standing policy" of which you speak. Perhaps it exists, but as I said, that analogy does not apply here in the first place.

I encourage you to RTM or email staff should you have an issue with any moderator's actions.

If you had knowledge of a banned member's presence you were welcome to RTM it, I've seen no such item cross my path.

As always, feel free to RTM any moderator action or inaction and it will be addressed by a third party. We're under far more scrutiny than the general membership.


Spice

Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

I do not tend to RTM much ...... I know it's easier for MODs when they are not questioned in threads..... but why not just discuss things openly?....

It just seems in reading the thread that your "moderation" in regards to the reviewer's opinion and a statement of facts known already are a bit slanted...... There are plenty of other items within the thread that are closer to guidelines infractions if you were wanting to actually moderate it I think....

Why the hell would her White Knights want to go after me, I'm on her side, lol? Oh...never mind, I've quit trying to figure out how your mind works, ha.


~ Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston

Beautiful Lexie...

I want to thank you for both your kind words and your humor today!! The last thing that I ever wanted was for you or anyone else to be threatened...

I know that we exist in a secret world and that to many people we are just hookers/ hooktards/ streetwalkers etc and I am ok with that... However, at the end of the day I do not feel like what we do is any different than any other service industry...

We have a product that some people may care for and that others may not... in this instance I had a gentleman who did not like me... who finds me to be incredibly unattractive... I can deal with that... it really is not a big deal...

However, since I do take pride in both myself and my business I wanted to do what any fortune 500 company would do... I offered a refund... Plain and simple... I stand by who I am, by what I represent and by the fact that I am an excellent courtesan/ hooker/ hooktard or whatever name that you want to call me...

Did I get tired of the continuous bashing from Sir Mickdickhead? Yes, I did... Should I have taunted him? I don't know... but after 10 months of always taking the high road I guess I got a little tired of always being SOOO NICE... Everyone has their limits... and yes, I have mine...

Because I was outed not ONCE but TWICE this year I have kept my posting to a minimum and that is one of the reasons that I do not post much in Houston... as a matter of fact if this incidence had not occurred I would have been perfectly content to just post my ads... book my appointments and carry on my slutty little way... Lol...

I come out of an appointment and I see that my personal life is being disused... My children should NEVER BE BROUGHT INTO THIS!! Especially, since, I offered him a refund... Thank you, Sir Spice it Up, for intervening in regards to my personal life... it is greatly appreciated

However, I have learned over the last year that you cannot run from a bully... and despite what this gentleman has said... He had an agenda and I think that has been made very clear over the last few days...

I have NO DESIRE to be OUTED AGAIN... Especially, right before Christmas... I am sorry that you were threatened because of me... Thank you for all of your kind words, your support and your wisdom... I think that I could learn much from you...

Your appreciative slave,

Guinevere

SG, prior to your no review, you were on my list. I've made attempts, in the past, to meet you. I know that patience is a virtue. Admittedly, I took you off the list. Now, that I've read this entire thread, I've come to the conclusion that I may have jump the gun.

You look damn hot to me. So, I'll keep trying to meet you. I can't wait.

~~

You leave too Slave...you're perpetuating it as much as he is...

You've said your piece about your review, now leave...

Sir Wakeup...

I am sorry... I lost my temper... It has been a very long 10 months...

Your apologetic slave,

Guinevere

Sir Animitasenthe...

Thank you... and may I say that I am incredibly flattered to be added to your NAUGHTY & NICE LIST!!

slave girl,

You are very close to the top now.

AS

I do not tend to RTM much ...... I know it's easier for MODs when they are not questioned in threads..... but why not just discuss things openly?.... Originally Posted by Whispers

Suit yourself, it doesn't bother me a bit. I'm unconcerned with what's easier. Like you, I'm a fan of transparency and open discourse to the extent possible.

-Spice

Wait, so.... SG, are we or aren't we partaking in this challenge together? I'll wait for your PM...