If Martin at any point knew Zimmerman had a gun, he had every reason to fear his life was being threatened and acted accordingly. Originally Posted by F-SharpIf he knew Zimmerman had a gun maybe he should have taken it away since he had the physical advantage in this confrontation. Better then hitting him in a way that left his hands free. Obviously he didn't know that Zimmerman had a gun.
If he knew Zimmerman had a gun maybe he should have taken it away since he had the physical advantage in this confrontation. Better then hitting him in a way that left his hands free. Obviously he didn't know that Zimmerman had a gun. Originally Posted by Billy_SaulAt least one of you is concurring that Zimmerman's story is bullshit. According to Zimmerman, Martin did know Zimmerman had a gun, as it is Zimmerman's claim that Martin reached for his gun and stated “One of us is going to die tonight.”.
Maybe we can conduct an experiment. We take f shart, Ben crump and sharpton, and bash their.heads into the.sidewalk and.deck em in the.face, and they can tell us if and when deadly force is justified. A standard must be.set. Originally Posted by Dr. PeckerWhy are all you Fox News sheep so hung up on Al Sharpton and Ben Crump? You make it sound they gang-raped your sister.
Maybe we can conduct an experiment. We take f shart, Ben crump and sharpton, and bash their.heads into the.sidewalk and.deck em in the.face, and they can tell us if and when deadly force is justified. A standard must be.set. Originally Posted by Dr. PeckerDude. what's with. all. the punctuation. Are. you really William. Shatner?
Well, I do have the internet if that wasn't obvious. And even though I don't own a tv, they're everywhere. And unlike you, I take what the media says with a grain of salt. I take it your favorite news source is the one known for selective editing. Originally Posted by Dr. PeckerUnlike me huh? Don't know what source you're referring to, but I have no television.
Al Sharpton and Ben Crump are opportunistic leeches who are trying to crucify an innocent man, and seek to make citizens unable to fight back against crime. Thats all there is to it. Originally Posted by Dr. PeckerSo what crime was being committed here that you feel required citizens to "fight back against"?