Reminder of my retirement.

It's the exact reason you used the term 'negroes', because you can and have obviously gotten away with it. Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

point of order, when the poll was up, several of the black people on this board said that they did not mind the use of the word negro. There is nothing derogatory about the word itself. it's the derivative of that word that we don't like used. If you take offense to word that's your view, but don't paint all the blacks here with your brush.

It would be different if he called surcher a 'crip' instead of saying he is crippled. Two different connotations of the same word.

back on topic: so what you're saying is that she should have to see him, even though she doesn't want to?

Read the last sentence in my post. Us gimps call ourselves gimps and have done so and will continue to do so ... Originally Posted by pyramider

I'm ex military and volunteer with some of our heros coming back from war. They use all kinds of terms to describe the different disabilities these soldiers have. I think they'd throw me out if I called one a "gimp." But, call yourself what you like and I'll do my best to accommodate your wishes.

back on topic: so what you're saying is that she should have to see him, even though she doesn't want to? Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

I normally don't acknowledge a person who's been banned 4 times, but in this case I will.

Remedial reading is your friend. Posted a few minutes ago, not 4 fucking years ago.

http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1055...&postcount=225

back on topic: so what you're saying is that she should have to see him, even though she doesn't want to? Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

heh...

So since she has the right to say no, which she did, what's all the argument about?

oh and just because I've been banned 8 times from your whore board, that does not make me less of a person.

heh... Originally Posted by YummyMarie

I know right...

Caroline, I believe the chick was only being ironic in saying that...vis a vis a recent thread about some NBA chick getting robbed by a white schmuck, causing some other mutts to glory in their schadenfreude.

http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1055...&postcount=122

But I could be wrong. On this whore board the tendency is to get lulled by emoticons and stuff telling us of a poster's humorous intent so when Lauren - admirably, in my opinion - didn't sprinkle a few lol's around it got confusing. My guess is you didn't see that other thread or you would have thought her post was funny. Originally Posted by Don T. Lukbak

Should that be the case, then I retract my indignation and apologize for taking it at face value. I did not read the thread to which you are referring, so I could very well have taken a sarcastic statement seriously.

Soo.....
A gimped up midget mud wrestling festival will not be hapining anytime soon?

What about one that involves baby oil?

Sure why not? If you sponsor it the gimp midget wrestlers will come.

Should that be the case, then I retract my indignation and apologize for taking it at face value. I did not read the thread to which you are referring, so I could very well have taken a sarcastic statement seriously. Originally Posted by CarolineDavenport

He's exactly right.

But no apology is necessary. Of course if you haven't read the other thread, you wouldn't know. I should have added a link or a disclaimer.

I absolutely support Jemma's, and anyone else's, right to see or not see
whomever they choose, for whatever reasons.

The penalty for not being informed and familiarizing yourself is for you to post some taint photos. Its the rules...sorry.

The penalty for not being informed and familiarizing yourself is for you to post some taint photos. Its the rules...sorry. Originally Posted by pyramider

Wait. Who has to post taint? I'm so confused.


PS. I thought you were dead. What happened?

point of order, when the poll was up, several of the black people on this board said that they did not mind the use of the word negro. There is nothing derogatory about the word itself. it's the derivative of that word that we don't like used. If you take offense to word that's your view, but don't paint all the blacks here with your brush.

It would be different if he called surcher a 'crip' instead of saying he is crippled. Two different connotations of the same word.

back on topic: so what you're saying is that she should have to see him, even though she doesn't want to? Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

If a provider isn't comfortable seeing someone because of their disability, then the session isn't likely to go well. She did the right thing by turning down the session. She could have went ahead with it, took his money and given him half-ass service. Since Surcher himself has said that his hobby funds are very limited, that would have been a very bad outcome for him. While I'm sure her words stung, he was/is able to use that $250 on someone who is comfortable with him.

Which according to the other ladies response, shouldn't be hard. Can't wait for the review..

Then quit staring in the mirror.

She doesn't advertise on BP .... so you haven't seen her.

She too rich for your wallet? Or, I can see Jemma is probably not your "cup of tea"...

http://houston.backpage.com/FemaleEs...st-23/12317785

FYI: I will comment on any provider I wish to comment upon. So don't waste your time trying to be the Post Police with me. Particularly if their company is pleasant and they are hospitable. Originally Posted by LexusLover

She started on Bp u bumbling idiot..u forgot already?
U get freebies or something from this chick?lol
I cant blame you..free pussy from the Walking Dead for defending her on eccie sounds like a good deal

ha..

Which according to the other ladies response, shouldn't be hard. Can't wait for the review.. Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

How many hookers have offered surcher their services, since Jemma has turned him down? My math is rusty