Trump and the anthem

lustylad's Avatar
And the only providers that would ever consider seeing lustyturd are transvestites like the ladyboy in his profile pic> OMG, fake tits, man face and a cock between his/her legs!
Originally Posted by Cap'n Crunch
Hey, I already knew crunchyass was blind to logic and rational arguments... now I know he is LITERALLY blind as well! He thinks the girl in my avatar is a guy!

Here's another view of the person you call "ladyboy", you blind idiot! Do the trannies you like to fuck in Austin look anything like this?

Cap'n Crunch's Avatar
lustyturd's sad desperation... LOL. He posts in a city 1400 mile away, so he can get his ass kicked on a regular basis. Too fucking funny!

And the only providers that would ever consider seeing lustyturd are transvestites like the ladyboy in his profile pic> OMG, fake tits, man face and a cock between his/her legs!

Originally Posted by Cap'n Crunch
Dear mixed up and confused lustyturd,


You wouldn't have posted the alternate photo of the girl if you thought it was obvious she wasn't a tranny! You also realized your avatar leaves some interpretation. You felt the need to post another photo! LOL

Your avatar shot kinda looks like a transvestite. You proved that you also know that. You could have picked a different photo. But you didn't. Which could be your freudian way of telling the world that you are into trannies. Go see a psychiatrist, Maybe you can get help sorting out your mixed signals.

Also, it is a bit queer to have a woman as your avatar. (Or a transvestite, if that's what you are into). Do you also have posters of naked women on the walls of your apartment?

Seriously.

lustyturd... do you have posters of naked women hanging on the wall of your apartment?
gfejunkie's Avatar
This is so fucking laughable. The CBS spin machine at full throttle...

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/t...hard-to-watch/

Everybody knows the real reason behind all those empty seats...

http://thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10/...week-7-photos/

Bad teams and awful quarterbacks? Yah, right...

The NFL is so badly damaged they may never recover. They only have themselves to blame.
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
This is so fucking laughable. The CBS spin machine at full throttle...

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/t...hard-to-watch/

Everybody knows the real reason behind all those empty seats...

http://thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10/...week-7-photos/

Bad teams and awful quarterbacks? Yah, right...

The NFL is so badly damaged they may never recover. They only have themselves to blame. Originally Posted by gfejunkie
Very interesting. According to ESPN summary of the Jets-Dolphin game, the attendance at the game was 65,025 out of a capacity of 65,326 which is almost as close to full as possible.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/game?gameId=400951598

I did not see that game but I did turn on games televised in my area: the Cowboys-SF game (100% full), the Bengals-Steelers game (100% full), the Panthers-Bears game (100% full), and the Falcons-Patriots game (96% full). Yup. attendance is really down.

Now it could be that attendance is counted as tickets sold rather than the actual number of people attending the games. But the revenue flow to the owners is still there, although it would affect concession sales.
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
Most certainly off-topic for this thread, but since you asked...

Originally Posted by gfejunkie
90% of posts within a thread are off-topic.

Interesting video but VERY misleading. Yes, some of Bernie Sanders goals align with the Trump Tax plan. Child tax credit. Lowering of corporate tax rate. Doing away with the inheritance tax, which to me is double taxation. However, lowering the highest bracket from 39.6% to 35% is a HUGE break for the wealthy. THAT is what I was referring to in my previous post. The details of the tax plan have not been given to us, but it is doubtful that the country can afford to give the larger middle class taxpayer the same reduction in taxes that is being proposed for the rich. Since there are so few people affected by lowering the tax rate from 39.6% to 35%, the impact to the economy would be minimal. But when the tax rate for the middle class is lowered, the impact to the revenue coming into the federal government is huge. The estimate is that the tax breaks will add over $1 trillion to the deficit. In my opinion, keep my money and don't increase the deficit. The American people are NOT over taxed in my opinion when compared to other similar nations.

The video you cited did NOT mention the lowering of the highest tax bracket or the impact on the deficit. I have not said I am against the Trump tax plan. Not enough detail. I was "promised" about a $1500 reduction in my taxes when Trump was running for President. From estimates I've seen by analysts, it is possible I will be paying MORE. But I won't pass judgement on the proposed tax plan until the details come out.
gfejunkie's Avatar
Now it could be that attendance is counted as tickets sold rather than the actual number of people attending the games. But the revenue flow to the owners is still there, although it would affect concession sales. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
Pictures do not lie. The fans are staying away in droves. I can remember a time when certain NFL teams were so bad that the fans came to games with paper bags on their heads...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_N..._Saints_season

But, they showed up.

Look, I can put on my #MAGA hat and go out in public and get assaulted by the likes of antifa any time I want to for free. Why should I pay to go to an event where my patriotism is under repeated assault week after week? (Don't shit yourself. The fans do see it that way.)

Makes no sense. People are catching on.
gfejunkie's Avatar
But I won't pass judgement on the proposed tax plan until the details come out. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
You already have. Several times.

BTW, in my 50+ years of working I never got a job from a poor person. Never.

Think about it.
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
Pictures do not lie. The fans are staying away in droves. I can remember a time when certain NFL teams were so bad that the fans came to games with paper bags on their heads...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_N..._Saints_season

But, they showed up.

Look, I can put on my #MAGA hat and go out in public and get assaulted by the likes of antifa any time I want to for free. Why should I pay to go to an event where my patriotism is under repeated assault week after week? (Don't shit yourself. The fans do see it that way.)

Makes no sense. People are catching on. Originally Posted by gfejunkie
I did not see any of the Jets-Dolphins game so I can't comment on the people in the stands. In the numbers which are reported for income tax purposes, the game was a sell-out. I did watch the other 4 games and the shots of the stands on TV back up the attendance figures -- the stands were packed to what looked like full capacity. So your statement that fans are "staying away in droves" lacks credibility. To cite a picture of a single game proves little. Show us a picture of the Steeler's game from yesterday and we'll see how many people stayed away.
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
You already have. Several times.

BTW, in my 50+ years of working I never got a job from a poor person. Never.

Think about it. Originally Posted by gfejunkie
Wrong again. I have said that from the information released so far on the proposed tax plan, the rich have benefits that are clearly defined -- lowering of the highest tax bracket and elimination of inheritance tax. The middle class, which includes me, does not yet have a definition of how the proposed tax reform will affect us. Could be very good and could be very bad. I will withhold my judgement until specifics are released.

Assuming that the middle class goes up to income of around $250k, or in that range, I have never worked for someone in the higher income group. I worked for a very large corporation and never directly reported to a "rich" person. Middle income people rule this country as far as # of workers and employers. SO I really have no idea as to the relevance of your statement about getting a job from a poor person.
gfejunkie's Avatar
SO I really have no idea as to the relevance of your statement about getting a job from a poor person. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
You'll figure it out. Eventually.
The elimination of the inheritance tax is a good thing and I hope you know it doesn't just benefit the rich.


Wrong again. I have said that from the information released so far on the proposed tax plan, the rich have benefits that are clearly defined -- lowering of the highest tax bracket and elimination of inheritance tax. The middle class, which includes me, does not yet have a definition of how the proposed tax reform will affect us. Could be very good and could be very bad. I will withhold my judgement until specifics are released.

Assuming that the middle class goes up to income of around $250k, or in that range, I have never worked for someone in the higher income group. I worked for a very large corporation and never directly reported to a "rich" person. Middle income people rule this country as far as # of workers and employers. SO I really have no idea as to the relevance of your statement about getting a job from a poor person. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
Oh hell no. I have never been hired by a company that was owned by a poor person.



You already have. Several times.

BTW, in my 50+ years of working I never got a job from a poor person. Never.

Think about it. Originally Posted by gfejunkie
gfejunkie's Avatar
Oh hell no. I have never been hired by a company that was owned by a poor person. Originally Posted by Austin Ellen
That's because they don't exist.
Cap'n Crunch's Avatar
The elimination of the inheritance tax is a good thing and I hope you know it doesn't just benefit the rich. Originally Posted by Austin Ellen
Why don't you please explain this perspective.


Also, your statement "I hope you know..." This is fact based or ideology based?
That's a good question. I was talking about folks who save their money and own a few things - this are folks who reuse Glad plastic bags and have saved every cent to pass onto their children. So not rich folks - but have enough saved that they get it taxed when they pass on.



Why don't you please explain this perspective.


Also, your statement "I hope you know..." This is fact based or ideology based? Originally Posted by Cap'n Crunch