The H. Clinton Emails - What's known, What's not

Just who in the fuck is responsible for the security of those emails?

Ponder the question for just a moment and perhaps a name will pop into your mind! Originally Posted by Ex-CEO

I pointed this out previously. The FBI investigating the security of the servers was from the press, not someone on here. Of course you called them stupid and bloviated a bit. Look, if she's guilty, I'm sure she'll get what's coming to her. It does no good to foam at the mouth in anticipation. I know you want everyone to jump in a Hillary bash with the gang, but we still have due process in this country.

who reading cjohnny54 email sent to someone else, edit or deleted on the receiving end

who reading cjohnny54 email sent to someone else, edit or deleted on the receiving end Originally Posted by MC19

SIT DOWN! you weren't asked!

I pointed this out previously. The FBI investigating the security of the servers was from the press, not someone on here. Of course you called them stupid and bloviated a bit. Look, if she's guilty, I'm sure she'll get what's coming to her. It does no good to foam at the mouth in anticipation. I know you want everyone to jump in a Hillary bash with the gang, but we still have due process in this country. Originally Posted by WombRaider

BURN THE WITCH!

I told you before SUCKCLOWN that there's NO way I can be an "uncle Tom " ! And still, you just don't comprende, eh chapete ? ! Tueres una OTRA pobrecita puta, guey !! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

U are one of the worst examples of an uncle tom, ur just too dumb to see it. You beg ur master to let u sleep in the house, and they laugh at u while u sleep in the shitroom. If u were a slave back in the day u would rat out the other slaves trying to escape and call them ungrateful.

U are one of the worst examples of an uncle tom, ur just too dumb to see it. You beg ur master to let u sleep in the house, and they laugh at u while u sleep in the shitroom. If u were a slave back in the day u would rat out the other slaves trying to escape and call them ungrateful. Originally Posted by southtown4488

He's Samuel L Jackson in Django Unchained. He cries when the massa died. He's nuttin' but a big ole house negro.

I pointed this out previously. The FBI investigating the security of the servers was from the press, not someone on here. Of course you called them stupid and bloviated a bit. Look, if she's guilty, I'm sure she'll get what's coming to her. It does no good to foam at the mouth in anticipation. I know you want everyone to jump in a Hillary bash with the gang, but we still have due process in this country. Originally Posted by WombRaider

+1

I pointed this out previously. The FBI investigating the security of the servers was from the press, not someone on here

So, you're going to join your fellow traveler in focusing on a bungled and out-of-context sentence in a press report and disingenuously claim or insinuate that it should be taken to mean that Hillary should be absolved of blame for her email server fiasco, bulk deletions, and cover-up because the FBI is supposedly investigating "only the emails," and not her personally? Is that how it works, Mr. Socialism-is-utopia?

Of course you called them stupid and bloviated a bit.

Of course, those with whom you agree NEVER "bloviate," do they? No, of course not. Are you going to now try to tell us that you're Mr. Kettle, not Mr. Pot? Who knows? Given all the obviously false claims concerning your occupation and accomplishments, you're likely to say just about anything!

Look, if she's guilty, I'm sure she'll get what's coming to her. It does no good to foam at the mouth in anticipation. I know you want everyone to jump in a Hillary bash with the gang, but we still have due process in this country.

Generally, yes, we still do have due process in the US. But I certainly don't expect Obama's justice department to subject his party's projected standard-bearer to much in the way of inconvenience or unpleasantry over this. I do think she'll pay a hell of a political price, though, and think that you progressives ought to be looking somewhere else lest she go down in flames (most likely politically speaking only, not legally) at a very inconvenient time.
Originally Posted by WombRaider

.

+1 Originally Posted by flghtr65

Another swing and a miss! You "+1ed" the wrong post, as the only recent posts you should approve are those that refute your comically ridiculous assertions outright.

Try this simple hypothetical on for size, flghtr. Let's say that, Tebow forbid, you are suspected of committing fraud by cheating a bunch of dupes out of their hard-earned money in some convoluted scam. Suppose further that the prosecution soon decides to subpoena and examine all your text messages along with emails, records of phone calls, and any other form of electronic or other communication.

Then suppose that you instruct your attorney to argue before the court that you should be absolved of all culpability because the authorities were ONLY supposed to be investigating your texts and emails, along with the "security" thereof, not you personally. (See how far you get with that one!)

Do you seriously believe that the FBI investigates ONLY emails, servers, and other inanimate objects with no view toward connecting dots between persons having something to do with their creation and existence? (Or non-existence due to intentional destruction, for that matter.)

Here's some good news for you, though, flghtr. Although you may now reasonably fear that you appear to be the most comically clueless person in this whole forum, you do have some very strong competition. There's actually a guy who kept arguing a couple of days ago that the heinous crime committed by that crazed gunman in Virginia who murdered the TV reporters was a hoax. It was staged, he said, as a "psyop," and there was actually no murder. Yes, seriously. He actually posted that.

Most clueless posts? Hard to say. It's a close race between you two!

U are one of the worst examples of an uncle tom, ur just too dumb to see it. You beg ur master to let u sleep in the house, and they laugh at u while u sleep in the shitroom. If u were a slave back in the day u would rat out the other slaves trying to escape and call them ungrateful. Originally Posted by southtown4488

I keeps tryin ta tell ya I ain't no homey, but typical lying liberal can't recognize the TROOF ! Pobrecita pendejo !

. Originally Posted by Ex-CEO

No, I'm merely making the point that the statement wasn't original with someone on this board. That's all. Anything else is something you've inferred. This happens a lot on this board. How about just take what I say for what I say and don't add anything to it. If I want to support her, I will say 'I support her', which I haven't said. As for Obama, I thought you guys said he hated Hillary and the Clintons. Now he's going to give her a pocket pardon on the way out. Which is it? Hates them or loves them?

Another swing and a miss! You "+1ed" the wrong post, as the only recent posts you should approve are those that refute your comically ridiculous assertions outright.

Try this simple hypothetical on for size, flghtr. Let's say that, Tebow forbid, you are suspected of committing fraud by cheating a bunch of dupes out of their hard-earned money in some convoluted scam. Suppose further that the prosecution soon decides to subpoena and examine all your text messages along with emails, records of phone calls, and any other form of electronic or other communication.

Then suppose that you instruct your attorney to argue before the court that you should be absolved of all culpability because the authorities were ONLY supposed to be investigating your texts and emails, along with the "security" thereof, not you personally. (See how far you get with that one!)

Do you seriously believe that the FBI investigates ONLY emails, servers, and other inanimate objects with no view toward connecting dots between persons having something to do with their creation and existence? (Or non-existence due to intentional destruction, for that matter.)

Here's some good news for you, though, flghtr. Although you may now reasonably fear that you appear to be the most comically clueless person in this whole forum, you do have some very strong competition. There's actually a guy who kept arguing a couple of days ago that the heinous crime committed by that crazed gunman in Virginia who murdered the TV reporters was a hoax. It was staged, he said, as a "psyop," and there was actually no murder. Yes, seriously. He actually posted that.

Most clueless posts? Hard to say. It's a close race between you two! Originally Posted by Ex-CEO

We agree on this. Mojo is nuts.

In my opinion the reason the Reps are out to get Hillary is the same as when the they helped Obama beat her. They want to run against someone they feel they have a chance against. Originally Posted by slingblade

+1