You're entitled to your opinions. I respectfully disagree with your assertion that it was in any way heavy handed.
People are welcome to, as you say, feel "that Provider's disclosing details of a session violates a member's expectation of privacy in a session". Please direct me to the guideline which disallows it.
Your analogy regarding social functions is flawed and does not apply here. It is presumed that both people in a session were present. In a social setting no such presumption of attendance exists. Regardless, I am unable to locate this "standing policy" of which you speak. Perhaps it exists, but as I said, that analogy does not apply here in the first place.
I encourage you to RTM or email staff should you have an issue with any moderator's actions.
If you had knowledge of a banned member's presence you were welcome to RTM it, I've seen no such item cross my path.
As always, feel free to RTM any moderator action or inaction and it will be addressed by a third party. We're under far more scrutiny than the general membership.
Spice
Originally Posted by SpiceItUp
I do not tend to RTM much ...... I know it's easier for MODs when they are not questioned in threads..... but why not just discuss things openly?....Whispers, I am thinking you might not realize what city you are in. The Houston moderator staff, since at least when I got here over two years ago, is a team of moderators. We just lost two to admin, but the replacements joined a team. Did you happen to notice how many mods from Houston have been posting in this thread?
It just seems in reading the thread that your "moderation" in regards to the reviewer's opinion and a statement of facts known already are a bit slanted...... There are plenty of other items within the thread that are closer to guidelines infractions if you were wanting to actually moderate it I think.... Originally Posted by Whispers
Mainly it has been Spiceitup. He has been the face of the Houston mod team in this thread. You are not used to that sort of moderating , I am sure. I have many days I may get 10 or more PM from other Houston mods to get my thoughts on posts and threads.
What I am saying is this. In Houston do not make the assumption that what a mod posts is only his opinion. It is as or more likely to be the consensus of the group discussion about the topic.
I would suggest you remember this in this case.
Now, everyone get back to the OP topic, which is discussion about SG and her apology.