+1
Originally Posted by flghtr65
Another swing and a miss! You "+1ed" the wrong post, as the only recent posts you should approve are those that refute your comically ridiculous assertions outright.
Try this simple hypothetical on for size, flghtr. Let's say that, Tebow forbid, you are suspected of committing fraud by cheating a bunch of dupes out of their hard-earned money in some convoluted scam. Suppose further that the prosecution soon decides to subpoena and examine all your text messages along with emails, records of phone calls, and any other form of electronic or other communication.
Then suppose that you instruct your attorney to argue before the court that you should be absolved of all culpability because the authorities were ONLY supposed to be investigating your texts and emails, along with the "security" thereof, not
you personally. (See how far you get with that one!)
Do you seriously believe that the FBI investigates ONLY emails, servers, and other inanimate objects with no view toward connecting dots between persons having something to do with their creation and existence? (Or
non-existence due to intentional destruction, for that matter.)
Here's some good news for you, though, flghtr. Although you may now reasonably fear that you appear to be the most comically clueless person in this whole forum, you do have some very strong competition. There's actually a guy who kept arguing a couple of days ago that the heinous crime committed by that crazed gunman in Virginia who murdered the TV reporters was a hoax. It was staged, he said, as a "psyop," and there was actually no murder. Yes, seriously. He actually posted that.
Most clueless posts? Hard to say. It's a close race between you two!