Have we decided to forgo the rules in favor of hostility?

guilty Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

That's what I'm talking about LOL.

Is WTF suggesting that mere searching through another's posts is a Guideline #17 cyber-stalking violation?

#17 - "Cyber Stalking" is a term that refers to the act of following another member around online. This may include persistent PMing of the other party, repeated ISOs about the other party, or excessive bumping of reviews or posting in threads about the other individual, whether it be positive or negative information posted. In any of these cases, whether staff deems that the behavior has crossed the line into cyber-stalking, or the "stalked" party complains to staff about the alleged behavior, staff will take the necessary steps to make it stop. Please avoid becoming involved in this type of conduct. Originally Posted by chicagoboy

Olivia admitted to repeated search's of LD's posts. A rules violation. I don't make up the rules.


''repeated ISOs about the other party''

Easy, I rarely read Coed. I stay mostly in the Spider Hole. No, I didn't have an epiphany, I searched on Daphne's handle and came upon this thread. The other day I searched on her handle and came upon a hateful comment she made about someone going to the ER that I responded to and another Angry Elf post she posted on that same day [I believe] that I RTM’d.

. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

hahahahaha! Keep 'em flying just like you are doing. Originally Posted by PhantomofTheOpera

Why , you'll just forget.

guilty

I need to share that with the hooker that want me to do a show and both the client and me pay her.
I taint paying you to fuck me old boy
well I taint doing a show if I can't sell it
rather buy my own time and do ya the way I want. Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

That's what I'm talking about LOL. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward

sorry for the edit

is that still what ya talking about

even if it gives ammo to other side.
btw, I'm not on a side. Just enjoying the show.
and wishing for a review

Olivia admitted to repeated search's of LD's posts. A rules violation. I don't make up the rules.


''repeated ISOs about the other party'' Originally Posted by WTF

I kinda thinck "repeated ISOs" refers to excessive posting of - or responding to - queries about a particular member in the respective ISO forums. Perhaps the mods will shed light on this.

I kinda thinck "repeated ISOs" refers to excessive posting of - or responding to - queries about a particular member in the respective ISO forums. Perhaps the mods will shed light on this. Originally Posted by chicagoboy

Perhaps you are correct...either way both Olivia and I could claim the other is stalking each other if you read all of rule #17.

As to this thread....Olivia was stalking LD , out of all the so called offensive behavior, she picked out LD's ? Come on. And then she admits to searching her posts. I sure the fuck do not search another posters unless it is once if they have attacked me and I can't figure out why. That is not the case here....clearly OH is stalking LD's posts.

Fuck I'd of never entered (nor known about) this thread had a link not lead me here from a forum I post in regularly. I do not get on here and do a search of a poster I am having trouble with posts'. That is stalking their posts.

Where she got those boots in pic 4 and the shoes in pic 19 of her ECCIE profile. Dayum. Do they come in size 12? Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

I have no doubt she'll be happy to answer a question like that. She loves to talk about her footwear. I'll ask her, but I think she's busy fucking a new girlfriend...

Ask your wife.



~ Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston

She doesn't make her money here. Val's a pornstar...
And she doesn't have anything to do with our convo here.

Surely y'all can do better than that.

I kinda thinck "repeated ISOs" refers to excessive posting of - or responding to - queries about a particular member in the respective ISO forums. Perhaps the mods will shed light on this. Originally Posted by chicagoboy

I'm intrigued DJ...if you were a moderator, who would you have banned by now? Originally Posted by Wakeup

You for starters.

Just a quick question........haven't you been banned from every hobby board you've been a part of?

Nothing any poster here does affects how many people sign up for this site every day... Originally Posted by Wakeup

No, but it has a lot to do with who stays on this site.

Originally Posted by Mojojo

So.. do the "Whore" threads count too? Because I feel like I'm being stalked... I have yet to start one thread about her and she's started 3 or 4 about me in the past 9-12 months, probably not even that long a period. I would consider that obsessive...

Where is my justice?

You for starters.

Just a quick question........haven't you been banned from every hobby board you've been a part of? Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

No, I haven't been banned here (I don't count the two hour ban that was overturned). But yes, I was banned from ASPD and Horndogs...and you see what's happened to those two sites...

So why would you ban me?

No, but it has a lot to do with who stays on this site. Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

Why does that matter?

It isn't so difficult to get piece and quiet around here.......just don't be pissing me off.......ijs

No, I haven't been banned here (I don't count the two hour ban that was overturned). But yes, I was banned from ASPD and Horndogs...and you see what's happened to those two sites...

So why would you ban me? Originally Posted by Wakeup

If I remember correctly you were also banned on TMA. I would ban you for excessive trolling, every time you called someone a 'fat whore', would get you points. So, since you got banned from ASPD and Horndogs, the sites went downhill from there? You're something else.

Why does that matter? Originally Posted by Wakeup

I'm not going to dumb it down, figure it out yourself........or is this act of denial part of the act of you protecting 'your' turf here?