Make up your mind, undercunt. Do we suffer from "dichotomized thinking" or not? Seems to me the term may be more apropos to you and the surrender monkey in the Oval Office. It's always either "my way or the highway" when Odumbo speaks, right?
Evidently you also suffer from a severe form of Alzheimer's. I've been getting blue in the face talking about our other options toward Iran:
http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1056...&postcount=151
Of course, tomorrow you will revert to babbling again that there are no third options.
.
Originally Posted by lustylad
Sometimes you do. Sometimes you don't. You have a problem with nuance. Everything must be able to fit into a neat, little category for you. If it doesn't, you struggle. Mentally. Dichotomized thinking isn't something you suffer from ALL the time or SOME of the time. That's precisely the point. In the case of Iran, all the choices other than war can basically be grouped together and filed under 'U' for useless. More sanctions. Yes, let's make the Republican Guard and their ilk even more rich, since they run the country's black market.
You would argue that they are closer now than they have ever been to a bomb, yes? And out of the other side of your mouth, you argue that the sanctions work and we should carry them further. Those two statements are at odds with each other. They can't both be true. One is true and the other, is false. So which is it? Do the sanctions work or are they closer to the bomb than ever? If you admit the sanctions failed, why seek to expand them?