Who in here would still have invaded Iraq in 2003? We know JD , LL and LustingGayAss would!

Why do you have a picture of your dad's nuts? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Back on topic:

LLIdiot, when are you going to answer the following question?

Knowing what we know now, was the ill fated and ill advised, Spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq worth the extremely steep price of approximately 5,000 American lives and $1 trillion dollars?

LLIdiot, was it worth it?

For the record, I say NO, both before and after.

What say you, LLIdiot?

Why do you have a picture of your dad's nuts? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Probably to remind himself of where he came from and what he's been lacking since conception... some balls !!!

Why do you have a picture of your dad's nuts? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

gnadfly wanted a picture....so Dad sent one for him.

Ray are you like gnadfly concerned about my dad's nuts? Originally Posted by WTF

No, but it sure appears that YOU are. And woomby / undercunt / rusty ballon knot and shammy are eager to help you give him an early father's day gift that he won't forget or forgive you for !

Back on topic:

LLIdiot, when are you going to answer the following question?

Knowing what we know now, was the ill fated and ill advised, Spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq worth the extremely steep price of approximately 5,000 American lives and $1 trillion dollars?

LLIdiot, was it worth it?

For the record, I say NO, both before and after.

What say you, LLIdiot? Originally Posted by bigtex

I thought you knew what I was thinking. Why do you have to ask?

Proves you are a liar.

BTW: The "invasion" did not cost ...

"...the extremely steep price of approximately 5,000 American lives and $1 trillion dollars..."

The "invasion" began on March 20, 2003, and ended April 15, 2003.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timelin...vasion_of_Iraq

COALITION military deaths: March 2003 = 92 and April 2003 = 80.
http://icasualties.org/IRAQ/ByMonth.aspx
U.S. military deaths: March 2003 = 65 and April 2003 = 74.
http://icasualties.org/IRAQ/ByMonth.aspx

So what "you know now" ... is incorrect. That's why you are a liar and ..

... an ignoramus. You would have been better off graduating from La Marque.

You just posted: "For the record, I say NO, both before ....."

to this statement ... or question, actually, with your spin in it.

"was the ill fated and ill advised, Spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq worth the extremely steep price of approximately 5,000 American lives and $1 trillion dollars?"

No you didn't.

I thought you knew what I was thinking. Why do you have to ask? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Come on LLIdiot, quit beating around the Shrub!

Quit running and hiding like the coward that we all know you are now and always have been.

Enough of your patented "Cut & Run Shuffle."

Just answer the friggin' question!

Knowing what we know now, was the 2003 invasion and subsequent war in Iraq, worth America's time, effort and expense.

Both in terms of $$$$ and American lives.

Or was it not worth it?

A simple "yes" or "no" will suffice!

I am on record as stating that it was not worth it.

In the event you missed it, mark me down for a firm "NO".

Both then and now!

See how easy that was?

One would think that even a Patriarchal Idiot coulda/woulda/shoulda be able to answer a simple "yes" or "no" question.

Why don't ya give it your best shot?

Go ahead LLIdiot, just roll the dice!

"YES" or "NO"?

Knowing what we know now, ..... Originally Posted by bigtex

I asked you to post the link .... which confirmed the OP. You haven't yet!

When you do I will "discuss" with you. In the meantime .... You are a Liar.

In typical childish, ignorant fashion, since you cannot prove what the OP stated and what you then followed with your own version, you have lamely attempted to shift the focus on others, in this case me, and pose the question you claim to have known all along.......like you knew there were no WMD's before the invasion of 2003 (which BTW lasted about 25 days).

Since you claim I stated what was stated in the originally OP .... and you can't prove it .... you are a liar.

Now, little boy, go play with yourself.

I asked you to post the link .... which confirmed the OP. You haven't yet!

When you do I will "discuss" with you. In the meantime .... You are a Liar.

In typical childish, ignorant fashion, since you cannot prove what the OP stated and what you then followed with your own version, you have lamely attempted to shift the focus on others, in this case me, and pose the question you claim to have known all along.......like you knew there were no WMD's before the invasion of 2003 (which BTW lasted about 25 days).

Since you claim I stated what was stated in the originally OP .... and you can't prove it .... you are a liar.

Now, little boy, go play with yourself. Originally Posted by LexusLover

You call him childish but you won't discuss anything until he produces some link. You know what you said, just admit that you would still go in there. Don't be a pussy about it. A lot of people said there were no WMDs. I bet you weren't one of them. You seem like the scared-cat motherfucker that shits his pants a lot so you probably were like 'go get them goddamn iraqis, I don't care if they have shit or not, kill 'em all'. Anything to neutralize your crippling fear.

I asked you to post the link .... which confirmed the OP. You haven't yet!

When you do I will "discuss" with you. In the meantime .... You are a Liar.

In typical childish, ignorant fashion, since you cannot prove what the OP stated and what you then followed with your own version, you have lamely attempted to shift the focus on others, in this case me, and pose the question you claim to have known all along.......like you knew there were no WMD's before the invasion of 2003 (which BTW lasted about 25 days).

Since you claim I stated what was stated in the originally OP .... and you can't prove it .... you are a liar.

Now, little boy, go play with yourself. Originally Posted by LexusLover

EARTH TO LLIDIOT, THIS IS NOT ( I Repeat NOT) AN ESCAPE AND EVASION DRILL!

These are (two) very simple "yes" or "no" questions that require nothing more than (two) very simple "yes" or "no" responses.

Actually, if you answer the questions correctly, there are no wrong answers! That should be an added bonus for an Idiot. (You can actually answer a couple of questions and not get them wrong.)

The (two) questions are as follows:

(1) At the time, did you approve of the ill fated and ill advised Spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq?

"Yes" or "No"?

(2) Knowing what we know now, was said invasion and subsequent War in Iraq, worth the time, effort and expense? Both in terms of American $$$$$ spent and American lives lost?

"Yes" or "No"?

These are (two) very basic questions that even a Patriarchal Idiot should be able to understand and properly respond to. There is certainly nothing difficult about the (two) questions. As an added bonus, the (two) questions require nothing more than (two) very simple "yes" or "no" answers.

So LLIdiot which is it, a simple yes or a simple no?

Give it your best shot!

For the record, my answer is a simple "NO" to both questions.

See how easy that was?

EARTH TO LLIDIOT, THIS IS NOT ( I Repeat NOT) AN ESCAPE AND EVASION DRILL!

These are two very simple "yes" or "no" questions that require nothing more than very simple "yes" or "no" responses.

Actually, if you answer the questions correctly, there are no wrong answers! That should be an added bonus for an Idiot. (You can actually answer a couple of questions and not get them wrong.)

The 2 questions are as follows:

(1) At the time, did you approve of the ill fated and ill advised Spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq?

"Yes" or "No"?

(2) Knowing what we know now, was said invasion and subsequent War in Iraq, worth the time, effort and expense? Both in terms of American $$$$$ spent and American lives lost?

"Yes" or "No"?

These are very basic questions that even a Patriarchal Idiot should be able to understand and properly respond to. There is certainly nothing difficult about the questions. As an added bonus, the questions require nothing more than simple "yes" or "no" answers.

So LLIdiot which is it, a simple yes or a simple no?

Give it your best shot!

For the record, my answer is a simple "NO" to both questions.

See how easy that was? Originally Posted by bigtex

Where is your link to the proof he hasn't answered it?

Where is your link to the proof he hasn't answered it? Originally Posted by DSK

What about you JLIdiot, err DSKIdiot?

Are your answers "yes" or "no" for the (two) very simple questions?

For the record, my answers were "NO" to both questions.

See how easy that was?

.... like the coward that we all know you are now and always have been. Originally Posted by bigtex

Does this ploy work for you much? Or do you trip over your own gauntlets?

Like landing in The Canal for an unscheduled swim?

EARTH TO LLIDIOT, THIS IS NOT ( I Repeat NOT) ... DRILL!

The (two) questions are as follows:

(1) At the time, did you approve of the ill fated and ill advised Spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq?

"Yes" or "No"?

(2) Knowing what we know now, was said invasion and subsequent War in Iraq, worth the time, effort and expense? Both in terms of American $$$$$ spent and American lives lost?
Originally Posted by bigtex

Your questions assume facts not in evidence.

Your weak deflection is noted, and I won't even bother about the "we"!

I notice your other "we-we" joined in the circle jerk you are orchestrating... to avoid the obvious ... you haven't a link to prove your 20-20 hindsight, xray, mind-reading prowess.

The Drill is over. You are dismissed, little boy.

Like I mentioned ... you can't be "confused with someone who went to high school in La Marque, Texas." Using you as a standard .. anyone of them is brilliant.

Does this ploy work for you much? Or do you trip over your own gauntlets? Originally Posted by LexusLover

LLIdiot, who said anything about a "ploy" or "gauntlets?"

I merely asked two simple "yes" or "no" questions that required of you, two simple "yes" or "no" answers.

No mention was ever made of a "ploy" or "gauntlets," until you entered them into the conversation.

Perhaps the use of the words "ploy" and "gauntlets" was a rather feeble attempt at deflection on your part.

Yep, probably so!

If so, it did not work!

Quit beating around The Wilted Shrub and answer the (two) question(s).

For the record, I have personally answered both questions.

You should give it a shot!

Since you claim I stated what was stated in the originally OP .... and you can't prove it .... you are a liar.

. Originally Posted by LexusLover

That is a fallacy.

You are the one lying. I can't prove JD is a cocksucker but everyone in the Navy in which he served knows.

The only person that can prove me a liar is you. If you can state that knowing then , what you now, You would not have invaded Iraq in 2003.

Until you can do that, I am not a liar.

Now, little boy, go play with yourself. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Prove that BT is a little boy. If you can not prove it, you are a liar.

LMAO this is fucking hilarious.