Clark County (Vegas) commissioner tells lawful Americans to make funeral plans

from now on if it has nothing to do with the OP you can kiss my ass cocksucker. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

And in RED too...

its about the 4 wheel crowd doing what they want and the people that enjoy elk meadows etc doing what they want ... an elk meadow is protected from 4 wheelers

I've yet to hear of a 4 wheel park needing protection from a heard of elk Originally Posted by CJ7

"elk meadows"... you are fucking joking, right? We need protection from you faggots... LOL

Are you hijacking to another thread Slobbrin?

Are you hijacking to another thread Slobbrin?

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Is this your BLM? ... Rectum Sucker

Is this your BLM? ... Rectum Sucker


Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

You have no answer for the TRUTH, do you Slobbrin?

You have no answer for the TRUTH, do you Slobbrin?

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You posted your own pic of you watching your new "Butt Plug Buttman Movie"... SICKO.

You and Buttman. It's like fight it with a pair of crash test dummies.

Take some time off. Reflect on your stupid ways.

Then you and your master can go fuck yourselves.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

You and Buttman. It's like fight it with a pair of crash test dummies.

Take some time off. Reflect on your stupid ways.

Then you and your master can go fuck yourselves.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

BUTTMAN movies really get you worked up


VV Rectum Rider VV


Do you have a big bowl of TURDS, while you watch?

pretty fucking brilliant, Slobbrin.

pretty fucking brilliant, Slobbrin. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Thanks, Shit Eater...

another thread hijacked by METRO-IFFO

Yeah, he fucked with Jesus in another thread. On Easter!

what a fucking retard!

I hope you feel better about yourself after making stuff up about me. And dodging the question. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Except i didn't dodge the question Senile Old Guy. I answered it in Post No. 229 above.

That is why there is such a thing as federal ownership of land.

And you never responded to that except to say "Business and housing are not the only productive uses of land". But you haven't specified what.

[QUOTE=I B Hankering;1055219710]Once again you throw up your straw man arguments and then knock them down so you can run around in your pathetic little circles and pretend you achieved something.

Identify a strawman argument I made. Do you even know what that phrase means?

Again, who has what "power" and who doesn't have a "power" is not always the most important factor in these cases, and sometimes that factor is far less important than the people's perception that a government agency is abusing its power.

I didn't ask you about power. I asked you about Bundy's legal claim. Answer the question IBEvading.

This influences the people's willingness to rise up and stand in rebellion against such perceived abuses, and that is happening. The current perception is that the BLM was allowing Reid, et al, to proceed with the commercial development of property deemed "too fragile" for use by cattle, and that seems arbitrary. The arbitrary enforcement of laws by a government agency is illegal.

Except the BLM is not arbitrarily enforcing the law, are they IBChangingTheSubject? The BLM has required ALL of the other ranchers to pay grazing fees and is trying to do the same to Bundy. But he keeps refusing and losing in court. So where is the arbitrary enforcement, IBConfused?

All laws must apply to all citizens equally: members of Congress and their families included.

All laws do. Do you have any evidence that the BLM would not make Harry Reid pay grazing fees, IBPuttingUpASmokeScreen?

BTW, you're still dragging rear.[/QUOTE]

Actually, you're so far to the rear we can't see you any more.

I asked you a straight up question - What LEGAL claim does Bundy have to graze on federal land free of charge? - and you have YET AGAIN failed to answer the question.

Instead, you changed the subject and spouted some gibberish about public perception.

Here is MY public perception. Bundy is a deadbeat trying to get over on the system.

Kind of like a Republic of Texas asshole that thinks he doesn't have to pay income taxes because they are unconstitutional.

Except i didn't dodge the question Senile Old Guy. I answered it in Post No. 229 above.

That is why there is such a thing as federal ownership of land.

And you never responded to that except to say "Business and housing are not the only productive uses of land". But you haven't specified what. Originally Posted by ExNYer

You clearly did make up stuff. That is the only way Statists can win arguments. It is also clear that the federal government owns much more land than what is used for the purposes you described.

So, let me make it easier for you. Does the federal government own too much land, not enough land, or about the right amount of land?