Oh well........ I am here to be informed AND entertained..........
Sixxw
putting your opinion forth is one thing, calling people names is childish and makes arguments... weaker. In a review to state opinion about bitchiness, mane haterish, assholish is fine. In coed? its stupid 3rd grade humor and doesn't promote the sharing of any information other than self alerting. imo Originally Posted by budman33If you've known something negative about someone for years, there's no chance of a review happening, so CoEd is the place to put out information. If the "name calling" makes the argument weaker, why bother responding to it? If it's so self-evident, others should recognize what you do and see it for the weak argument that it is and dismiss it. Same goes for the self alert.
I'm sure you debated in school, its usually part of the curriculum. At what point was it ok to go from expressing your free speech to saying.. "well your pathetic and fat so fuck you, I win!"Debating is not free speech or expression of free speech. It's a regimented form of presenting a point of view. Posting on a forum also is not a debate.
Its not his message or anyone else's. The vocabulary and nasty personal insults, while entertaining on a long work day, make me less inclined to consider his message.Take it for what it is, decide what it's worth to you (as you obviously have). There are others who see value in it. Though I do have to wonder why you only jump to women's defense. From reading what you write, you should have a problem with guys calling each other names.
If you've known something negative about someone for years, there's no chance of a review happening, so CoEd is the place to put out information. If the "name calling" makes the argument weaker, why bother responding to it? If it's so self-evident, others should recognize what you do and see it for the weak argument that it is and dismiss it. Same goes for the self alert.
Debating is not free speech or expression of free speech. It's a regimented form of presenting a point of view. Posting on a forum also is not a debate.
Take it for what it is, decide what it's worth to you (as you obviously have). There are others who see value in it. Though I do have to wonder why you only jump to women's defense. From reading what you write, you should have a problem with guys calling each other names. Originally Posted by Rand Al'Thor
You might be surprised how many people here don't get what seems self evident to some of us. There are people Sooo obviously full of shit with multiple handles and it's allowed for whatever reason. Girls who are on tour at the same time they giggle and wax poetic about working on dual doctorate degrees or some bs and it's allowed to float by like it ain't no thing. Originally Posted by Hannah HeresyHannah,
Thor, earlier you stated "While I don't always agree with what Whispers says, I will defend his right to say it until the Board Owners change the Guidelines." Guideline #3 states"Disrespect to others in general, will be considered a item of low tolerance, especially when posting in Co-ed Forum". So it would appear obvious that the owners want a Co-ed forum that does not have to be hateful and attacking, unless the guidelines are just words and you, again, know something I don't. Originally Posted by oralick
I get that she called you a "bad name" back. However, in my opinion, you cannot defend your use of the term "man-hater", provoked or unprovoked, in a open Co-ed board, towards a Provider that depends on this for her living. I now understand that the words of the Guidelines may not be taken so literally. I have learned a lot. I don't agree with a lot of what you say, so we will agree to disagree. But I can see no reason for you to call her that, and, in my opinion it is a very despicable act. As far as I know you're not a giggolo, so I don't believe being called a misogynist attacks your business and has quite the same ramifications. Why do you have to bring all your hateful crap to the Co-ed board. Can't you dump your bile in the Men's Lounge or the Spider Hole. You really do have some interesting points and observations, but then you inevitably start going to your dark place and taking casualties. And many of the ladies won't come here, out of concern. Why do you want that? Originally Posted by oralickInteresting POV, and I agree that sometimes the "namecalling" is unnecessary and unneeded, however I do not understand the distinction between namecalling made above. Calling a provider names is wrong and uncalled for because it may damage her business, but it is ok to call those who do not earn a living as a provider names because it does not damage their livelihood????? That's like saying that we should punish everyone that calls lawyers ugly names (but aren't lawyers)!
I think, at least with me, that taking away the premise, illusion or not, that the provider i am with sincerely wants me to have a good experience, and may be enjoying it with me, is important. I don't want a provider to tell me "take your nasty f...ing dick out and let me get this over with". " I actually hate you and you better get your ass out of here as soon as you're through, dammit!" In this industry isn't that kinda what the term implies. I got no problem with different points of view escalating to a point where some bad language may spew as an eventuality. But I do with attacking just because you can. Originally Posted by oralick
You're gonna have to help me here. How does calling a lawyer a dirty name affect the profession that Eccie serves? Originally Posted by oralickIt was an analogy. By applying the same logic, calling lawyers (trained professionals) bad names in thier own trade publication would necessarily hurt their business............not!!!!!!! Let's face it, most "names" that folks from the civilian world have for those of us that participate in the hobby are not nice, yet it does not stop our participation. In fact it actually attracts some of us!!!!