Why Hillary will obliterate Drumpf.

CuteOldGuy's Avatar
Jesus, Whiny! Is that all you got?

I've got lots of friends.

You've got lots of enemas.

There. Feel better? I've responded to your comment with an equally childish (but more creative) one.

You dress like a fagnit. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Ah, Assup. Try reading "How to Win Friends and Influence People". Oops, sorry. I mean, have someone read it to you.
lustylad's Avatar
Lad, the emails that were sent to Hillary were clearly labeled "UNCLASSIFIED" on the very top line of the email. Here is the proof.... Originally Posted by flghtr65
You can't possibly be serious. You do know that the emails sent to Hillary included 22 with the highest possible security classification, right? It's called SAP and it covers matters so sensitive that the contents of the 22 emails could not even be divulged to the Inspector General who discovered their existence while investigating this staggering security breach and scandal!

Now tell me again what your argument is, flighty. Are you seriously suggesting those 22 SAP emails found on the hildebeest's private server were erroneously marked UNCLASSIFIED?

Oh, and one more question for you, flighty.... let's assume a US Secretary of State receives an email containing, say, satellite photos of a North Korean nuclear weapons site.... do you think a prudent, competent, and security-minded Secretary of State just might be expected to recognize this as extremely sensitive regardless of its classification label?
lustylad's Avatar
You should stick to washing bottles, flighty. Your princess Hildebeest is on record directing one of her minions to remove the security classification markings and send that material to her by insecure means, flighty. Your whole position is exposed as a fallacious charade, flighty. Hildebeest was told she couldn't use an insecure device, flighty, but she did it anyway. Hildebeest knew she was violating security protocols, flighty, and that's why she directed her minion to remove the classification markers from the classified document. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
+1

Btw I think ex-CEO is right. hildebeest should not be capitalized.
TRUMP sets the 0zombie Retard Straight...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGfaSOVL0J0
flghtr65's Avatar
Now tell me again what your argument is, flighty. Are you seriously suggesting those 22 SAP emails found on the hildebeest's private server were erroneously marked UNCLASSIFIED?

Oh, and one more question for you, flighty.... let's assume a US Secretary of State receives an email containing, say, satellite photos of a North Korean nuclear weapons site.... do you think a prudent, competent, and security-minded Secretary of State just might be expected to recognize this as extremely sensitive regardless of its classification label? Originally Posted by lustylad
LAD, did you read the link that was in post #249? The link from the Washington Post lists all of the staffers that sent Hillary emails and how many emails they sent. They were all marked UNCLASSIFIED, just like in the example that was posted. If you have an issue with the Washington Post take it up with them.

Regarding your question. The BURDEN does not change because of how sensitive the information is. You can dream up any hypothetical you want, the BURDEN is on the sender not the recipient. It is a State Department rule. If you don't like their rule take it up the State Department.

Hillary made a public statement that she did not send or receive emails that were labeled CLASSIFIED. So far this has been proven to be a true statement. The State Department changed the classification of some of the emails to CLASSIFIED months after they were originally sent.

From the link.

Material not allowed on non-approved systems

Federal rules prohibit sharing classified material on non-approved or personal systems. Regulations dictate the burden is on the sender of an e-mail to classify its security clearance level.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...clinton-email/
LAD, did you read the link that was in post #249? The link from the Washington Post lists all of the staffers that sent Hillary emails and how many emails they sent. They were all marked UNCLASSIFIED, just like in the example that was posted. If you have an issue with the Washington Post take it up with them.

Regarding your question. The BURDEN does not change because of how sensitive the information is. You can dream up any hypothetical you want, the BURDEN is on the sender not the recipient. It is a State Department rule. If you don't like their rule take it up the State Department.

Hillary made a public statement that she did not send or receive emails that were labeled CLASSIFIED. So far this has been proven to be a true statement. The State Department changed the classification of some of the emails to CLASSIFIED months after they were originally sent.

From the link.

Material not allowed on non-approved systems

Federal rules prohibit sharing classified material on non-approved or personal systems. Regulations dictate the burden is on the sender of an e-mail to classify its security clearance level.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...clinton-email/ Originally Posted by flghtr65

frigger65, your gas-lighting does not work on people with common sense...


not a typo I just like frigger65 better than frighter65 so sue me...
LexusLover's Avatar
The emails aren't going to "do in" Hillarious-no-More ...

.. it will be Bill being caught in the women's restroom pretending to be a TS....

.. and Hillarious-no-More blaming it on a "Great Right-Wing Conspiracy" ... AGAIN!
flghtr65's Avatar
better than frighter65 so sue me... Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
Why sue you? Your net worth is less than $0.00. It would be a waste of time and money.
flghtr65's Avatar
The emails aren't going to "do in" Hillarious-no-More ...
Originally Posted by LexusLover
I agree with you on that. They will have to try and find something else.
Why sue you? Your net worth is less than $0.00. It would be a waste of time and money. Originally Posted by flghtr65
Check out a real American... not a sissy like frigger65

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIdHNiYH0-4


This man thinks frigger65 is a puto... so do I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1p6XImLEac


This man thinks you are a white liberal sissy, frigger65 and I agree!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Uin_fwCkLE


I will spend all night posting these videos of TRUE AMERICANS and Crush your 0zombie Ass. Watch ME, frigger65


frigger65 the original 0zombie... needs to wake the FUCK UP!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiO6eYpb5vY


Come on sissy boy, frigger65... Nap time is over

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIIu9nTwMzA


Do you think I can hit 50 Videos of (OTW) TRUMP Supporters, tonight... frigger65?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRb449BPhz4
Splain to me some more frigger65???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=367psk5ZdpU


Why does a White Woman named Clinton have to be elected or else it's racist? frigger65...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqwWUnB4vek


frigger65, real Americans think your candidate stinks...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5RMoVPDmnQ
Hey, frigger65 you got a problem with "Making America Great Again"?...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nWhwcboHj0


1/5th there in forty minutes...
I haven't seen a video like this for the other candidates. I wonder why?

Jim


https://youtu.be/yXgItaNgiEg