She said it,That's not the first time a bill has to pass to know what's in it.
https://www.youtube.com/
Originally Posted by Tiny
She said it,That's not the first time a bill has to pass to know what's in it.
https://www.youtube.com/
Originally Posted by Tiny
That's not the first time a bill has to pass to know what's in it.What a load of crap. Crony capitalism is the culprit, and Paul is less of a crony capitalist than most Democratic and Republican Senators and Congressmen. His explanation of how the employers are responsible for inflation, not governments, is a laugh. I guess hyperinflation in Venezuela, Brazil, Argentina and Zimbabwe can be blamed on the employers.
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
What a load of crap. Crony capitalism is the culprit, and Paul is less of a crony capitalist than most Democratic and Republican Senators and Congressmen. His explanation of how the employers are responsible for inflation, not governments, is a laugh. I guess hyperinflation in Venezuela, Brazil, Argentina and Zimbabwe can be blamed on the employers.I'll tell him you think his theories are shit.
He's a professor at the New School. I had a Marxist professor who was a product of the New School. I don't think it's a serious academic institution. It's more of a playground for Communists. Originally Posted by Tiny
You don't think Communism is a serious academic undertaking? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500As the great philosopher Strokey McDingDong said, course work in science, engineering, medicine and the like is preparation for the real world. The New School for Social Research doesn't offer classes in any of these. It's a good place to go if you want to be an academic in the liberal arts, a housewife or a Communist.
As the great philosopher Strokey McDingDong said, course work in science, engineering, medicine and the like is preparation for the real world. The New School for Social Research doesn't offer classes in any of these. It's a good place to go if you want to be an academic in the liberal arts, a housewife or a Communist. Originally Posted by Tiny
Tiny should be happy. Gonna be $2T rather than 3.5. That barely exceeds the unpaid for Republican tax cuts for the wealthy.The estimate was $2 trillion lower revenues over 10 years for tax cuts for corporations, pass through businesses, and individuals of all income levels. Since Biden will axe the cuts after 5 years, the amount will be less.
Too bad republicans refuse to pay for their spending. Originally Posted by NoirMan
The estimate was $2 trillion lower revenues over 10 years for tax cuts for corporations, pass through businesses, and individuals of all income levels. Since Biden will axe the cuts after 5 years, the amount will be less.A trickle.
And what was the effect on the economy? In 2019, before COVID, we had the lowest unemployment rate since the late 1960's, and median household income finally headed upwards a lot, after stagnating during the Bush and Obama administrations. I believe the corporate tax cuts played a part in that. Originally Posted by Tiny
Dividend stocks are companies that pay out regular dividends. Dividend stocks are usually well-established companies with a track record of distributing earnings back to shareholders.Earnings? Or expected savings?
The estimate was $2 trillion lower revenues over 10 years for tax cuts for corporations, pass through businesses, and individuals of all income levels. Since Biden will axe the cuts after 5 years, the amount will be less.You believe. Lol. The trend was headed that way anyway. Had been for years. The tax cuts led to deficit spending which had been cut significantly under the Obama administration. Just because you believe that something was a cause doesn’t make it so. Particularly when there was no trend change or change of direction of economic indicators. Remove the presidents and tax cuts from the picture. Have a look at all economic indicators up through the pandemic and the 8 years prior and it’s one trend line.
And what was the effect on the economy? In 2019, before COVID, we had the lowest unemployment rate since the late 1960's, and median household income finally headed upwards a lot, after stagnating during the Bush and Obama administrations. I believe the corporate tax cuts played a part in that. Originally Posted by Tiny
As the great philosopher Strokey McDingDong said, course work in science, engineering, medicine and the like is preparation for the real world. The New School for Social Research doesn't offer classes in any of these. It's a good place to go if you want to be an academic in the liberal arts, a housewife or a Communist. Originally Posted by TinyOr a ts?
You believe. Lol. The trend was headed that way anyway. Had been for years. The tax cuts led to deficit spending which had been cut significantly under the Obama administration. Just because you believe that something was a cause doesn’t make it so. Particularly when there was no trend change or change of direction of economic indicators. Remove the presidents and tax cuts from the picture. Have a look at all economic indicators up through the pandemic and the 8 years prior and it’s one trend line.Hmmmm... I understand now. So the actual economy and GDP were WORSE with Trump on. And the HIGHER prices for grocery items, building and construction supplies, and increased prices for petrol somehow HELP the economy??
Tax cuts cost money. If you spend the same amount of money and take a lower paying job you’ll be living off your credit cards real soon. That is what tax cuts did for America. Hurried us to our credit card. And with spending increased in the Trump years that just made it worse.
You know better. Republicans love cutting taxes for the rich but the hate paying for them. Originally Posted by NoirMan
Hmmmm... I understand now. So the actual economy and GDP were WORSE with Trump on. And the HIGHER prices for grocery items, building and construction supplies, and increased prices for petrol somehow HELP the economy??You don't get it.
Let's ask the consumers, the everyday people out there who are now PAYING the increased prices - how they like it.
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
Hmmmm... I understand now. So the actual economy and GDP were WORSE with Trump on. And the HIGHER prices for grocery items, building and construction supplies, and increased prices for petrol somehow HELP the economy??One day you should take a class on reading comprehension. It’s clear you’ve failed many.
Let's ask the consumers, the everyday people out there who are now PAYING the increased prices - how they like it.
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
You believe. Lol. The trend was headed that way anyway. Had been for years. The tax cuts led to deficit spending which had been cut significantly under the Obama administration. Just because you believe that something was a cause doesn’t make it so. Particularly when there was no trend change or change of direction of economic indicators. Remove the presidents and tax cuts from the picture. Have a look at all economic indicators up through the pandemic and the 8 years prior and it’s one trend line.You're distorting what I wrote: "I believe the corporate tax cuts played a part in that."
Tax cuts cost money. If you spend the same amount of money and take a lower paying job you’ll be living off your credit cards real soon. That is what tax cuts did for America. Hurried us to our credit card. And with spending increased in the Trump years that just made it worse.
You know better. Republicans love cutting taxes for the rich but the hate paying for them. Originally Posted by NoirMan
Here's an excerpt from a WSJ column titled Democrats Pursue Europe’s Welfare State on American-Style Taxes, by Greg Ip,
The $3.5 trillion fiscal package Democrats hope to pass soon represents an ambitious expansion of the social safety net, offering regular child allowances, paid sick and parental leave, universal preschool and free college.
What would most Americans pay for all these new benefits? Nothing.
Led by President Biden, Democrats seek to emulate the comprehensive welfare states common in Western Europe, without the high taxes Europeans routinely pay. Under the Democrats’ proposal, 90% of American households would either pay less or the same taxes, according to an analysis released Tuesday by the Tax Policy Center. The richest 1% would pay all of the net new taxes levied next year.
Ip goes on to describe the social programs the Europeans have, like what Biden's proposing, in more detail. Which leads to,
....Yet if other countries’ welfare states are a template for American progressives, their taxes aren’t. In Germany, the typical worker pays 49% of her labor compensation in income and payroll taxes (including the employer’s contribution); in France, the proportion is 47%, in Sweden, 43%. In the U.S., it is just 30%. The U.S. alone, among major advanced economies, doesn’t impose a value added tax on consumers of goods and services.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/democra...ts_pos4&page=1
So are everyday Americans ready to step up and fork over 49% of their paychecks in return for a social welfare paradise? I suspect not. Originally Posted by Tiny