Still don't believe he's a muslim?

Harold Lamb was not a trained academic historian; in fact, Lamb wrote more fiction than he did nonfiction, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp. Additionally, and more importantly, Lamb's book is nearly a century old, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp. Meanwhile, "John Morris Roberts, CBE (14 April 1928 – 30 May 2003) was a British historian, with significant published works who was Vice Chancellor of the University of Southampton, from 1979-1985, and he was Warden of Merton College, Oxford, from 1985-1994." And "Jonathan Simon Christopher Riley-Smith, GCStJ, FRHistS (born 27 June 1938) is a historian of the Crusades,[1] and a Fellow of Emmanuel College, Cambridge." Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Words... words, words, more words. I am Cornholio. Do you have tp for my bunghole

Words... words, words, more words. I am Cornholio. Do you have tp for my bunghole Originally Posted by UnderConstruction

That is obviously a rhetorical question, you "#Grubered" Odumbo Minion. Everyone knows you lick your ass like the dog you are, you "#Grubered" Odumbo Minion.

Still don't believe he's a muslim..........or scientologist either.

No bars, no chains, and yet you too still remain here within the colony.
So why is that ? Originally Posted by rioseco

Actually, I come and go. I don't live here. I pass through and throw some rocks at poor IB, IIFFy, and a few others because it is fun to watch them flail and drool. But I actually am active on a number of other boards as well. So are folks like Whirley, GFEJunkie, and others. When I meet them on a different thread I am completely civil and often agree with their posts. My comment was addressed to people like IB (and others) who essentially spend their entire ECCIE life in this forum--and maybe their entire life! As much as they post it seems that way. If you look at where I post, most days I come in to ECCIE I post maybe 5 or 6 posts and usually in more than just the political forum. That in my mind is NOT being held self-captive in here.

IB on the other hand: his last 700 (yes, SEVEN HUNDRED) posts have never left the Political Form (it likely is a lot more than that, but a quick scan showed at least that many)--not a single post anywhere else. And, it was done in a month. That is 8400 posts in a year!! THAT, sir, is someone who has trapped themselves in the zoo as an inmate, not a visitor.

Just for a different comparison: In one month IB has about as many posts as you have made in over 4 years. YOU obviously have a life that takes you out of the zoo to actually live in the real world. IB doesn't.

See the difference?

Actually, I come and go. I don't live here. I pass through and throw some rocks at poor IB, IIFFy, and a few others because it is fun to watch them flail and drool. But I actually am active on a number of other boards as well. So are folks like Whirley, GFEJunkie, and others. When I meet them on a different thread I am completely civil and often agree with their posts. My comment was addressed to people like IB (and others) who essentially spend their entire ECCIE life in this forum--and maybe their entire life! As much as they post it seems that way. If you look at where I post, most days I come in to ECCIE I post maybe 5 or 6 posts and usually in more than just the political forum. That in my mind is NOT being held self-captive in here.

IB on the other hand: his last 700 (yes, SEVEN HUNDRED) posts have never left the Political Form (it likely is a lot more than that, but a quick scan showed at least that many)--not a single post anywhere else. And, it was done in a month. That is 8400 posts in a year!! THAT, sir, is someone who has trapped themselves in the zoo as an inmate, not a visitor.

Just for a different comparison: In one month IB has about as many posts as you have made in over 4 years. YOU obviously have a life that takes you out of the zoo to actually live in the real world. IB doesn't.

See the difference?
Originally Posted by Old-T

There you have it folks! Old-THUMPER has put his pathetic, little trollish stalker testimonial in writing for all to see.

Harold Lamb was not a trained academic historian; in fact, Lamb wrote more fiction than he did nonfiction, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp. Additionally, and more importantly, Lamb's book is nearly a century old, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp. Meanwhile, "John Morris Roberts, CBE (14 April 1928 – 30 May 2003) was a British historian, with significant published works who was Vice Chancellor of the University of Southampton, from 1979-1985, and he was Warden of Merton College, Oxford, from 1985-1994." And "Jonathan Simon Christopher Riley-Smith, GCStJ, FRHistS (born 27 June 1938) is a historian of the Crusades, and a Fellow of Emmanuel College, Cambridge." And it remains, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp, there's no reason to believe you when you claim you understand what Lamb wrote. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Lamb wrote 23 fiction and 20 non fiction books was a student of Asia spoke French,Latin, Persian,Arabic, and a smattering of Mancho-Tarter. Just because he wrote something contrary to what you want to hear tough shit. Bet you discount the Bible because it was written a while back.

Lamb wrote 23 fiction and 20 non fiction books was a student of Asia spoke French,Latin, Persian,Arabic, and a smattering of Mancho-Tarter. Just because he wrote something contrary to what you want to hear tough shit. Bet you discount the Bible because it was written a while back. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Highly reputable, modern, academic historians (e.g., Oxford and Cambridge) specializing in the study of the Crusades disagree with you, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp, and your opinion of what Lamb wrote.

There you have it folks! Old-THUMPER has put his pathetic, little trollish stalker testimonial in writing for all to see.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Why not true at all! I directly responded to Rio's post--or are you somehow saying my post did not address his?

I am so very sorry if you take issue with the simple facts that I posted. You can easily check them if you wish.

FACT: You did indeed post over 700 consecutive times in the political forum. Probably WELL over, but I lost interest in counting by 25s.
FACT: It took you about one month.
FACT: Since Rio has only a bit over 700 posts since 2010, your one month total is roughly equivalent to his lifetime total.
FACT: 700x12 is 8400. That is a LOT of posts.

Which of those very straightforward comments do you take issue with? Speak up--we can't hear you.

These are facts about YOU. Facts YOU brought into existence. So what you are saying is you think it is unfair or improper for me to actually remind you of what YOU did. Where is that great sense of personal responsibility you are big on? Own those posts, as bad as most of them are! I didn't give you credit for a single one that isn't yours fair and square. This is as bad as you claiming that you took your own post out of context last week. Most folks would be embarrassed to admit they were that dumb.

Unlike you I don't have to change words or pretend past facts are actually something different. Go look up any of those facts for yourself. Just think, if you were a mod you could erase all those posts and then claim they never existed! Just like your gay blow-up doll avatar.

Rant on!

Why not true at all! I directly responded to Rio's post--or are you somehow saying my post did not address his?

I am so very sorry if you take issue with the simple facts that I posted. You can easily check them if you wish.

FACT: You did indeed post over 700 consecutive times in the political forum. Probably WELL over, but I lost interest in counting by 25s.
FACT: It took you about one month.
FACT: Since Rio has only a bit over 700 posts since 2010, your one month total is roughly equivalent to his lifetime total.
FACT: 700x12 is 8400. That is a LOT of posts.

Which of those very straightforward comments do you take issue with? Speak up--we can't hear you.

These are facts about YOU. Facts YOU brought into existence. So what you are saying is you think it is unfair or improper for me to actually remind you of what YOU did. Where is that great sense of personal responsibility you are big on? Own those posts, as bad as most of them are! I didn't give you credit for a single one that isn't yours fair and square. This is as bad as you claiming that you took your own post out of context last week. Most folks would be embarrassed to admit they were that dumb.

Unlike you I don't have to change words or pretend past facts are actually something different. Go look up any of those facts for yourself. Just think, if you were a mod you could erase all those posts and then claim they never existed! Just like your gay blow-up doll avatar.

Rant on!
Originally Posted by Old-T

FACT, Old-THUMPER, you posted your pathetic, little trollish stalker testimonial in writing for all to see at post #274.

Yep, typical IB: deflect.

Simple question: which of those facts do you dispute?

Yep, typical IB: deflect.

Simple question: which of those facts do you dispute? Originally Posted by Old-T

FACT, Old-THUMPER, you're a liar and you're a stalker, and you posted your pathetic, little trollish stalker testimonial in writing for all to see at post #274.

FACT, Old-THUMPER, you're a liar and you're a stalker, and you posted your pathetic, little trollish stalker testimonial in writing for all to see at post #274. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Originally Posted by Old-T

FACT, Old-THUMPER, you're a pathetic, trollish little stalker that invariably turns every thread towards your unnatural fixation on post counts.

poor IBIdiot!

Oh, and he'll be calling you "#Grubered" long past its expiration date.... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Expiration date? In your dreams, assup! The term "grubered" is a permanent addition to the lexicon. Too bad there is no "expiration date" on the smug, condescending and destructive libtard attitudes for which Jonathan Gruber is Exhibit A.